Nutritional studies in crustaceans and the problems of applying research findings to practical farming systems

Methodological approaches for undertaking research on the dietary nutrient requirements of farmed crustaceans should ensure that the studies are designed and conducted in such a manner that the ensuing results can be applied under practical farming conditions. Sadly, the majority of studies to date have had little practical applicability, the bulk of nutrient-requirement studies having been conducted under controlled, artificial, laboratory conditions. Despite the fact that the giant tiger prawn (Penaeus monodon Fabricius), the whiteleg shrimp (Penaeus vannamei Boone) and the fleshy prawn (Penaeus chinensis Osbeck) are the three most-cultivated crustacean species in the world (total aqua-culture production of these crustacean species in 1993 totalled 625487 metric tonnes or 66.9% of the total world farmed crustacean production), little or no information exists concerning their dietary nutrient requirements under practical semi-intensive pond-farming conditions (where the bulk of the production is currently realized). To a large extent this has been due to the apparent reluctance of the conventional laboratory-based crustacean nutritionist to also work under field conditions and the difficulty of quantifying the contribution of natural food organ-isms in the overall nutritional budget of pond-raised crustaceans. If meaningful conclusions are to be drawn from nutrient requirement studies and dietary feeding trials, it is essential that the experimental animals be reared under conditions mimicking as far as possible those of the intended farm production unit and environment, including holding facility (indoor or outdoor tank, cage or pond), feed preparation technique (grinding, pelleting, drying; diet texture, form, shape, size, buoyancy and water stability), feeding method (hand, demand or automatic feeding; feeding frequency and feeding rate–fixed or satiation feeding; day or night-time feeding), water quality (temperature, turbidity, salinity, oxygen and mineral concentration; water exchange rate, water circulation pattern and artificial aeration), photoperiod (artificial or natural) and crustacean stocking density. Finally, but not least, it is essential that the growth performance of the experimental animals be at least equal to or greater than that of the target crustacean species under practical farming conditions if realistic conclusions are to be drawn, and it is necessary that dietary nutrient requirements can be ascertained under conditions of maximum attainable growth.

[1]  G. Allan,et al.  Effects of stocking density on production of Penaeus monodon Fabricius in model farming ponds , 1992 .

[2]  C. B. Cowey,et al.  Finfish nutrition in Asia : methodological approaches to research and development , 1985 .

[3]  D. Davis,et al.  Estimation of apparent phosphorus availability from inorganic phosphorus sources for Penaeus vannamei. , 1994 .

[4]  W. A. Lellis.  A Standard Reference Diet for Crustacean Nutrition Research VI. Response of Postlarval Stages of the Caribbean King Crab Mithrax spinosissimus and the Spiny Lobster Panulirus argus , 1992 .

[5]  G. Schroeder.  Sources of fish and prawn growth in polyculture ponds as indicated by δC analysis , 1983 .

[6]  L. D’Abramo,et al.  A Standard Reference Diet for Crustacean Nutrition Research.: III. Effects on Weight Gain and Amino Acid Composition of Whole Body and Tail Muscle of Juvenile Prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii1 , 1989 .

[7]  J. Castell,et al.  Report of the EIFAC, IUNS and ICES Working Group on standardization of methodology in fish nutrition research. (Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany, 21-23 March 1979). , 1980 .

[8]  R. Pullin,et al.  Detritus and microbial ecology in aquaculture , 1987 .

[9]  C. M. Gempesaw,et al.  Economies of Pond Size for Hybrid Striped Bass Growout1 , 1992 .

[10]  T. Lovell.  Nutrition and Feeding of Fish , 1988, Springer US.

[11]  B. Pan,et al.  In-vitro digestibility simulating the proteolysis of feed protein in the midgut gland of grass shrimp (Penaeus monodon) , 1993 .

[12]  M. Minagawa,et al.  The use of stable isotopes for food web analysis. , 1991, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[13]  Lori Moore.  Input of organic materials into aquaculture systems: Emphasis on feeding semi-intensive systems , 1986 .

[14]  K. Leber,et al.  Using Experimental Microcosms in Shrimp Research: The Growth‐Enhancing Effect of Shrimp Pond Water , 1988 .

[15]  D. Smith,et al.  Biochemical composition of some prey species of Penaeus esculentus Haswell (Penaeidae: Decapoda) , 1991 .

[16]  Donald W. Freeman,et al.  Design and use of outdoor microcosm laboratory tanks for the evaluation of shrimp diets , 1991 .

[17]  E. Robinson,et al.  Apparent digestibility of feedstuffs by the marine shrimp Penaeus vannamei Boone , 1989 .

[18]  D. Teichert-Coddington,et al.  Substitution of Chicken Litter for Feed in Production of Penaeid Shrimp in Honduras , 1991 .

[19]  A. J. Matty,et al.  A simple in vitro method for measuring protein digestibility , 1989 .

[20]  R. Reigh,et al.  Apparent digestibility coefficients for common feedstuffs in formulated diets for red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkii. , 1990 .

[21]  M. Grabner.  An in vitro method for measuring protein digestibility of fish feed components , 1985 .

[22]  Aquacop,et al.  Effect of squid meal on growth of Penaeus monodon juveniles reared in pond pens and tanks , 1992 .

[23]  Houng-Yung Chen.  Recent Advances in Nutrition of Penaeus monodon , 1993 .

[24]  Edna C. Bolivar,et al.  Growth and survival of Penaeus monodon juveniles fed a diet lacking vitamin supplements in a modified extensive culture system , 1992 .

[25]  G. Allan,et al.  Effects of pond preparation and feeding rate on production of Penaeus monodon Fabricius, water quality, bacteria and benthos in model farming ponds , 1995 .

[26]  G. Cuzon,et al.  Composition, preparation and utilization of feeds for Crustacea , 1994 .

[27]  D. Bengtson.  A Comprehensive Program for the Evaluation of Artificial Diets , 1993 .

[28]  K. Leber,et al.  The relative enhancement of Penaeus vannamei growth by selected fractions of shrimp pond water , 1992 .

[29]  V. D. Peñaflorida.  An evaluation of indigenous protein sources as potential component in the diet formulation for tiger prawn, Penaeus monodon, using essential amino acid index (EAAI) , 1989 .

[30]  M. Gadient,et al.  Leaching of various vitamins from shrimp feed , 1994 .

[31]  P. Aharon,et al.  Diet and Food Assimilation by Channel Catfish and Malaysian Prawns in Polyculture as Determined by Stomach Content Analysis and Stable Carbon Isotope Ratios 1 , 1987 .

[32]  K. Ang,et al.  An enclosure design for feeding and fertilisation trials with the freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man) , 1994 .

[33]  G. Cuzon,et al.  Time lag effect of feeding on growth of juvenile shrimp, Penaeus japonicus Bate , 1982 .

[34]  N. Morrissy.  A Standard Reference Diet for Crustacean Nutrition Research.: IV. Growth of Freshwater Crayfish Cherax tenuimanus , 1989 .

[35]  Y. Tanaka,et al.  Nitrogen Budget for the Rotifer Brachionus plicatilis , 1991 .

[36]  Richard K. Anderson,et al.  A 13C/12C Tracer Study of the Utilization of Presented Feed by a Commercially Important Shrimp Penaeus vannamei in a Pond Growout System1 , 1987 .

[37]  J. Heinen,et al.  A culture system for nutritional studies of crustaceans , 1988 .

[38]  丸修 弟子,et al.  数種配合飼料がウシエビの成長,飼料効率,及び生残率に及ぼす効果 , 1985 .

[39]  W. G. Hutchinson,et al.  An experimental system for small-scale experiments with marine fish and crustaceans , 1994 .

[40]  J. Castell,et al.  A Standard Reference Diet for Crustacean Nutrition Research. I. Evaluation of Two Formulations , 1989 .

[41]  M. New,et al.  Farm-made aquafeeds. , 1993 .