The shape of evolution: systematic tree topology

Three hypotheses that predict probabilities associated with various tree shapes, or topologies, are compared with observed topology frequencies for a large number of 4, 5, 6 and 7-member trees. The united data on these n-member trees demonstrate that both the equiprobable and proportional-to-distinguishable-types hypotheses poorly predict tree topologies, while all observed topology frequencies are similar to predictions of a simple Markovian dichotomous branching hypothesis. Differences in topology frequencies between phenetic and non-phenetic trees are observed, but their statistical significance is uncertain. Relative frequencies of highly asymmetrical topologies are larger, and those of symmetrical topologies are smaller, in phenetic than in non-phenetic trees. The fact that a simple Markovian branching process, which assumes that each species has an equal probability of speciating in each time period, can predict tree topologies offers promise. Refinement of Markovian branching hypotheses to include the possibility of multiple furcations, differential speciation and extinction rates for different groups of organisms as well as for a single group through geological time, hybrid speciation, introgression, and lineage fusion will be necessary to produce realistic models of lineage diversification.

[1]  J. Farris Methods for Computing Wagner Trees , 1970 .

[2]  D. Levin,et al.  Rates of evolution in seed plants: Net increase in diversity of chromosome numbers and species numbers through time. , 1976, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  J. Sepkoski,et al.  A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria , 1979, Paleobiology.

[4]  W. Fitch,et al.  Construction of phylogenetic trees. , 1967, Science.

[5]  Alan F. Karr,et al.  Natural clades differ from “random” clades: simulations and analyses , 1981, Paleobiology.

[6]  E. Harding The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation , 1971, Advances in Applied Probability.

[7]  Arnold G. Kluge,et al.  A Numerical Approach to Phylogenetic Systematics , 1970 .

[8]  G. Yule,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evolution, Based on the Conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. , 1925 .

[9]  David M. Raup,et al.  Variation between groups in evolutionary rates: a statistical test of significance , 1980, Paleobiology.

[10]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  Stochastic Models of Phylogeny and the Evolution of Diversity , 1973, The Journal of Geology.

[11]  L. V. Valen,et al.  A new evolutionary law , 1973 .

[12]  G. Estabrook,et al.  An idealized concept of the true cladistic character , 1975 .

[13]  Joseph Felsenstein,et al.  The number of evolutionary trees , 1978 .

[14]  V. Ferris A Science in Search of a Paradigm?—Review of the Symposium, “Vicariance Biogeography: A Critique” , 1980 .

[15]  F. McMorris,et al.  A Mathematical Foundation for the Analysis of Cladistic Character Compatibility , 1976 .

[16]  Kenneth K. Kidd,et al.  Testing of Evolutionary Independence in Simulated Phylogenetic Trees , 1978 .

[17]  G. Estabrook,et al.  An Application of Compatibility Analysis to the Blackiths' Data on Orthopteroid Insects , 1977 .

[18]  Stephen Jay Gould,et al.  The shape of evolution: a comparison of real and random clades , 1977, Paleobiology.

[19]  A. Larson,et al.  The Genetic Relationships of the Salamanders of the Genus Plethodon , 1979 .

[20]  J. Sepkoski,et al.  A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity I. Analysis of marine orders , 1978, Paleobiology.

[21]  A. Wilson,et al.  Rapid speciation and chromosomal evolution in mammals. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  B. Rensch,et al.  Evolution above the species level , 1959 .

[23]  Henry T. Wright The Comparative Stratigraphy of fourth millennium Khuzistan , 1978 .

[24]  D. Rosen Vicariant Patterns and Historical Explanation in Biogeography , 1978 .

[25]  L. Cavalli-Sforza,et al.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: MODELS AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURES , 1967, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.