The short-term regulation of foraging in harvester ants

In the seed-eating ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus, the return of successful foragers stimulates inactive foragers to leave the nest. The rate at which successful foragers return to the nest depends on food availability; the more food available, the more quickly foragers will find it and bring it back. Field experiments examined how quickly a colony can adjust to a decline in the rate of forager return, and thus to a decline in food availability, by slowing down foraging activity. In response to a brief, 3- to 5-min reduction in the forager return rate, foraging activity usually decreased within 2--3 min and then recovered within 5 min. This indicates that whether an inactive forager leaves the nest on its next trip depends on its very recent experience of the rate of forager return. On some days, colonies responded more to a change in forager return rate. The rapid colony response to fluctuations in forager return rate, enabling colonies to act as risk-averse foragers, may arise from the limited interval over which an ant can track its encounters with returning foragers. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

[1]  S. Shafir Risk-sensitive foraging: the effect of relative variability , 2000 .

[2]  D. Gordon,et al.  Optimization, Conflict, and Nonoverlapping Foraging Ranges in Ants , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The dynamics of the daily round of the harvester ant colony (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  G. DeGrandi-Hoffman,et al.  Factors influencing the selection of recipients by workers performing vibration signals in colonies of the honeybee,Apis mellifera , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  T. Valone,et al.  Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  W. Park The “Language” of Bees , 1923 .

[7]  O. Reichman Spatial and temporal variation of seed distributions in Sonoran Desert soils , 1984 .

[8]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Information Processing in Social Insects , 1999, Birkhäuser Basel.

[9]  D. Gordon The Regulation of Foraging Activity in Red Harvester Ant Colonies , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[10]  P. Nonacs,et al.  Patch sampling behaviour and future foraging expectations in Argentine ants, Linepithema humile , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  W. Mackay A comparison of the energy budgets of three species of Pogonomyrmex harvester ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1985, Oecologia.

[12]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Flexibility and the Foraging Ecology of Seed-Eating Ants , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[13]  S. O’Donnell Worker biting interactions and task performance in a swarm-founding eusocial wasp (Polybia occidentalis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 2001 .

[14]  Adrian M. Wenner,et al.  Science Round-Up , 1993 .

[15]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Behavioral Ecology Advance Access published January 22, 2007 Behavioral Ecology , 2022 .

[16]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Forager activation and food availability in harvester ants , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Risky Theories—The Effects of Variance on Foraging Decisions , 1996 .

[18]  W. Farina,et al.  Reward rate and forager activation in honeybees: recruiting mechanisms and temporal distribution of arrivals , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  J. C. Munger,et al.  LONG-TERM YIELD FROM HARVESTER ANT COLONIES: IMPLICATIONS FOR HORNED LIZARD FORAGING STRATEGY' , 1984 .

[20]  J. McNamara Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment , 1982 .

[21]  T. Valone Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation , 1989 .

[22]  S. Pratt Quorum sensing by encounter rates in the ant Temnothorax albipennis , 2005 .

[23]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  The harvester ant (Pogonomyrmex badius) midden: refuse or boundary? , 1984 .

[24]  D. Gordon The spatial scale of seed collection by harvester ants , 1993, Oecologia.

[25]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Task-Related Differences in the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Composition of Harvester Ants, Pogonomyrmex barbatus , 1998, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[26]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[27]  N. Pinter,et al.  Variation in the transition from inside to outside work in the red harvester ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[28]  D. Gordon Species-specific patterns in the social activities of harvester ant colonies (Pogonomyrmex) , 1984, Insectes Sociaux.

[29]  Deborah M. Gordon Interaction patterns and task allocation in ant colonies , 1999 .

[30]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests , 1996 .

[31]  Jacobus C. Biesmeijer,et al.  The role of internal and external information in foraging decisions of Melipona workers (Hymenoptera: Meliponinae) , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  T. Caraco,et al.  Resource Consumption Variance Within and Among Individuals: On Coloniality in Spiders , 1995 .

[33]  Deborah M. Gordon,et al.  Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[35]  Erik V. Nordheim,et al.  Productivity in a social wasp: per capita output increases with swarm size , 1996 .

[36]  D. Gordon,et al.  Social insects: Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions , 2003, Nature.

[37]  J. Boomsma,et al.  Task partitioning in insect societies: bucket brigades , 2002, Insectes Sociaux.