Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDPatients and healthcare stakeholders are increasingly becoming engaged in the planning and conduct of biomedical research. However, limited research characterizes this process or its impact.OBJECTIVEWe aimed to characterize patient and stakeholder engagement in the 50 Pilot Projects funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and identify early contributions and lessons learned.DESIGNA self-report instrument was completed by researchers between 6 and 12 months following project initiation.PARTICIPANTSForty-seven principal investigators or their designees (94 % response rate) participated in the study.MAIN MEASURES Self-report of types of stakeholders engaged, stages and levels of engagement, facilitators and barriers to engagement, lessons learned, and contributions from engagement were measured.KEY RESULTSMost (83 %) reported engaging more than one stakeholder in their project. Among those, the most commonly reported groups were patients (90 %), clinicians (87 %), health system representatives (44 %), caregivers (41 %), and advocacy organizations (41 %). Stakeholders were commonly involved in topic solicitation, question development, study design, and data collection. Many projects engaged stakeholders in data analysis, results interpretation, and dissemination. Commonly reported contributions included changes to project methods, outcomes or goals; improvement of measurement tools; and interpretation of qualitative data. Investigators often identified communication and shared leadership strategies as “critically important” facilitators (53 and 44 % respectively); lack of stakeholder time was the most commonly reported challenge (46 %). Most challenges were only partially resolved. Early lessons learned included the importance of continuous and genuine partnerships, strategic selection of stakeholders, and accommodation of stakeholders’ practical needs.CONCLUSIONSPCORI Pilot Projects investigators report engaging a variety of stakeholders across many stages of research, with specific changes to their research attributed to engagement. This study identifies early lessons and barriers that should be addressed to facilitate engagement. While this research suggests potential impact of stakeholder engagement, systematic characterization and evaluation of engagement at multiple stages of research is needed to build the evidence base.

[1]  J. Girdlestone,et al.  Building capacity for service user and carer involvement in research: the implications and impact of best research for best health. , 2010, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[2]  D Elbourne,et al.  Involving consumers in designing, conducting, and interpreting randomised controlled trials: questionnaire survey , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  J. Sloan,et al.  Patient engagement in research: a systematic review , 2014, BMC Health Services Research.

[4]  Mary Newburn,et al.  User involvement in the development of a research bid: barriers, enablers and impacts 1 , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[5]  A. Lophatananon,et al.  THE JAMES LIND ALLIANCE APPROACH TO PRIORITY SETTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER RESEARCH: AN INTEGRATIVE METHODOLOGY BASED ON PATIENT AND CLINICIAN PARTICIPATION , 2011, BJU international.

[6]  Erin Holve,et al.  Involving Patients and Consumers in Research: New Opportunities for Meaningful Engagement in Research and Quality Improvement , 2012 .

[7]  A. Faulkner,et al.  Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study , 2011 .

[8]  Mohammad Hassan Murad,et al.  A Systematic Review of Approaches for Engaging Patients for Research on Rare Diseases , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[9]  J. F. Caron-Flinterman,et al.  The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[10]  H. Hearnshaw,et al.  Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[11]  J. Boote,et al.  Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey , 2007, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[12]  K. Carman,et al.  Unresolved tensions in consumer engagement in CER: a US research perspective. , 2013, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[13]  Shawna L. Mercer,et al.  Can public health researchers and agencies reconcile the push from funding bodies and the pull from communities? , 2001, American journal of public health.

[14]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities , 2011, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[15]  L. Leslie,et al.  A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research , 2014, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Rosemary Barber,et al.  The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research , 2011, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  L. Forsythe,et al.  Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[18]  Lori Frank,et al.  The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. , 2014, JAMA.

[19]  Anne C. Beal,et al.  Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[20]  M. Shattell,et al.  Review: Community-Based Participatory Research Approach to Address Mental Health in Minority Populations , 2011, Community Mental Health Journal.

[21]  D. Lavallee,et al.  Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. , 2012, JAMA.

[22]  J. Boote,et al.  Involving the public in systematic reviews: a narrative review of organizational approaches and eight case examples. , 2012, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[23]  W. Freeman,et al.  Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement. North American Primary Care Research Group. , 1999, BMJ.

[24]  Emily Moore,et al.  Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice. , 2015, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[25]  A. Macaulay,et al.  Participatory research maximises community and lay involvement , 1999 .

[26]  P. Butow,et al.  Operationalising a model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research , 2007, Australia and New Zealand health policy.

[27]  J. Boote,et al.  Public involvement in the design and conduct of clinical trials: a narrative review of case examples , 2011, Trials.

[28]  Sandy Oliver,et al.  Involving the public in NHS public health, and social care research: briefing notes for researchers , 2004 .

[29]  Matthew M Davis,et al.  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 , 2010, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[30]  J. Boote,et al.  Public Involvement in the Design and Conduct of Clinical Trials , 2011 .

[31]  A D Oxman,et al.  Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. , 2006, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[32]  V. Montori,et al.  Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework , 2015, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[33]  F. Gibson,et al.  The Art of Age-Appropriate Care: Reflecting on a Conceptual Model of the Cancer Experience for Teenagers and Young Adults , 2013, Cancer nursing.

[34]  K N Lohr,et al.  Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. , 2004, Evidence report/technology assessment.

[35]  S. Staniszewska,et al.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review , 2014, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[36]  Scott D Ramsey,et al.  Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. , 2012, Journal of comparative effectiveness research.

[37]  Sharon F. Terry,et al.  Science and society: Advocacy groups as research organizations: the PXE International example , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[38]  J Gabbay,et al.  Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[39]  A. Macaulay,et al.  Practice-based Research is Community Engagement , 2009, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine.

[40]  Stuart Peacock,et al.  Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review. , 2009, Health policy.

[41]  Shoshannah A. Pearlman.  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , 2013, Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association.

[42]  N. Britten,et al.  Consulting parents about the design of a randomized controlled trial of osteopathy for children with cerebral palsy , 2011, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[43]  Evelyn P Whitlock,et al.  AHRQ series paper 3: identifying, selecting, and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews: AHRQ and the effective health-care program. , 2010, Journal of clinical epidemiology.