Justifying the Decisions for EAI Adoption in LGAs: A Validated Proposition of Factors, Adoption Lifecycle Phases, Mapping and Prioritisation of Factors

Local Government Authorities (LGAs) are responsible for providing reliable services and information to their citizens. However, literature indicates that LGAs have problems in meeting citizens' demands. This may be attributed to the Information Technology (IT) infrastructure limitations in LGAs that are not integrated and do not allow them to deliver end-to-end integrated services. The reason is that legacy Information Systems (IS) are usually tailored to support specific business processes and functions and are difficult to integrate. This gives rise to a need for an integrated IT infrastructure that facilitates reuse of existing applications and flexibly implementing business processes. Enterprise Application Integration (EAI) has emerged to address the intra- and inter-organisational integration in a more flexible and manageable way. Nevertheless, its application in LGAs is limited. Thus, the authors demonstrate that it is of high importance to investigate this area within LGAs and result in research that contributes towards successful EAI adoption. In addressing the relative void, this paper proposes and validates a novel model for EAI adoption in LGAs and contributes to the body of knowledge by extending the literature. The proposed model can be used by LGAs as a tool for decision making while adopting EAI.

[1]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[2]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Investigation of factors affecting healthcare organization's adoption of telemedicine technology , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  R. McIvor,et al.  Internet technologies: supporting transparency in the public sector , 2002 .

[4]  Shi-Ming Huang,et al.  Assessing risk in ERP projects: identify and prioritize the factors , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[5]  Peter Walsh,et al.  Improving Governments' Response to Local Communities — is Place Management an Answer? , 2001 .

[6]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  An enterprise application integration methodology for e-government , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[7]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Investigating EAI Adoption in LGAs: A Case Study Based Analysis , 2007, AMCIS.

[8]  Dimitrios Tzovaras,et al.  The need for a digital rights management framework for the next generation of e-government services , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[9]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Journal of Enterprise Information Management Justifying the decisions for EAI implementations : a validated proposition of influential factors , 2016 .

[10]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[11]  M. M. Kamal,et al.  IT innovation adoption in the government sector: identifying the critical success factors , 2006, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[12]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Towards a Methodology for the Development of Integrated IT Infrastructures , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[13]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[14]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Extending the information system lifecycle through enterprise application integration: a case study experience , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[15]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Mapping factors influencing EAI adoption in the local government authorities on different phases of the adoption lifecycle , 2008 .

[16]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .

[17]  Ray J. Paul,et al.  ERP problems and application integration issues: an empirical survey , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  Vasiliki G. Mantzana,et al.  Investigating the adoption of enterprise application integration in healthcare organisations using an actor-oriented approach , 2006 .

[19]  H DavenportThomas Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system , 1998 .

[20]  Rainer Alt,et al.  Enterprise application integration-the case of the Robert Bosch Group , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  Scott Mitchell,et al.  A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sector information resource management executives , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  ThemistocleousMarinos,et al.  Evaluating the Adoption of Enterprise Application Integration in Health-Care Organizations , 2006 .

[23]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[24]  Maria Wimmer,et al.  A European perspective towards online one-stop government: the eGOV project , 2002, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[25]  Wing Lam,et al.  Barriers to e-government integration , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[26]  N. Schillewaert,et al.  Organizational innovation adoption: a multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research , 2002 .

[27]  Steve Vinoski,et al.  Where is Middleware? , 2002, IEEE Internet Comput..

[28]  Nikolaus Augsten,et al.  The Role of Web Services in Digital Government , 2003, EGOV.

[29]  Christoph Bussler,et al.  Enterprise Application Integration , 2005, Encyclopedia of Database Technologies and Applications.

[30]  Jose L. Salmeron,et al.  An AHP-based methodology to rank critical success factors of executive information systems , 2005, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[31]  Les Worrall,et al.  Justifying Investment in GIS: A Local Government Perspective , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[32]  H. Chen,et al.  Adopting Emerging Integration Technologies in Organisations , 2010 .