Local Open Government: Empirical Evidence from Austrian Municipalities

Local governments have increasingly been applying an open and collaborative approach towards public management during the last years. Accordingly, they aim at increasing accessibility by releasing public data and providing participative decision-making arenas. ‘Open government’ has also been implemented in Austrian municipalities. This paper takes stock of the current status of open government implementation in Austria by analyzing survey data from city managers. Findings indicate that Austrian municipalities choose releasing public data over involving citizens in decision-making. Although public managers seem to value the principles of an open government, a successful implementation of open government is hampered by resource constraints.

[1]  A. Meijer.  Government Transparency in Historical Perspective: From the Ancient Regime to Open Data in The Netherlands , 2015 .

[2]  O. Williamson,et al.  STRATEGY RESEARCH: GOVERNANCE AND COMPETENCE PERSPECTIVES , 1999 .

[3]  Ines Mergel.  Opening Government , 2015 .

[4]  Torsten Oliver Salge,et al.  Benefiting from Public Sector Innovation : the Moderating Role of Customer and Learning Orientation , 2012 .

[5]  Mary K. Feeney,et al.  Managerial Ambivalence and Electronic Civic Engagement: The Role of Public Manager Beliefs and Perceived Needs , 2018 .

[6]  A. M. Evans,et al.  Open Government Initiatives: Challenges of Citizen Participation , 2013 .

[7]  H. Guo,et al.  Public Participation and Organizational Performance: Evidence from State Agencies , 2012 .

[8]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[9]  Lisa Schmidthuber,et al.  Unleashing Innovation beyond Organizational Boundaries: Exploring Citizensourcing Projects , 2018 .

[10]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Phases of the Adoption of Innovation in Organizations: Effects of Environment, Organization and Top Managers , 2006 .

[11]  M. Hillebrandt,et al.  Open government: connecting vision and voice , 2012 .

[12]  M. Hansen.  ANTECEDENTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: THE DIFFUSION OF NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMENT INTO DANISH LOCAL GOVERNMENT , 2011 .

[13]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective , 2012, Inf. Polity.

[14]  Thomas Gegenhuber,et al.  The emergence of local open government: Determinants of citizen participation in online service reporting , 2017, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Taewoo Nam,et al.  Suggesting frameworks of citizen-sourcing via Government 2.0 , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  V. Bekkers,et al.  Innovation in the Public Sector: A Systematic Review and Future Research Agenda , 2015 .

[17]  B. Wirtz,et al.  Open Government: Origin, Development, and Conceptual Perspectives , 2015 .

[18]  Dennis Hilgers,et al.  Open Government: Theoretische Bezüge und konzeptionelle Grundlagen einer neuen Entwicklung in Staat und öffentlichen Verwaltungen , 2012, Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft.

[19]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  The Use of ICT for Open Government in U. S. Municipalities , 2014 .

[20]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[21]  Christoph Ihl,et al.  Citizensourcing: Applying the Concept of Open Innovation to the Public Sector , 2010 .

[22]  Joseph A. Hamm,et al.  Public Participation, Procedural Fairness, and Evaluations of Local Governance: The Moderating Role of Uncertainty , 2012 .

[23]  Young Hoon Kwak,et al.  An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..