piggyBac transposase tools for genome engineering

Significance DNA transposons that translocate by excision from a donor site and insertion into a target site are often used for genome engineering by insertional mutagenesis and transgenesis. The piggyBac element is especially useful because it can excise precisely from an insertion site, restoring the site to its pretransposon state. Precise excision is particularly useful when transient transgenesis is needed, for example, in the transient introduction of transcription factors for induced pluripotent stem cell production. We have used mutagenesis to generate an Excision+ Integration− transposase that allows piggyBac excision without potentially harmful reintegration. These mutations likely lie in a target DNA-binding domain. The transposon piggyBac is being used increasingly for genetic studies. Here, we describe modified versions of piggyBac transposase that have potentially wide-ranging applications, such as reversible transgenesis and modified targeting of insertions. piggyBac is distinguished by its ability to excise precisely, restoring the donor site to its pretransposon state. This characteristic makes piggyBac useful for reversible transgenesis, a potentially valuable feature when generating induced pluripotent stem cells without permanent alterations to genomic sequence. To avoid further genome modification following piggyBac excision by reintegration, we generated an excision competent/integration defective (Exc+Int−) transposase. Our findings also suggest the position of a target DNA–transposase interaction. Another goal of genome engineering is to develop reagents that can guide transgenes to preferred genomic regions. Others have shown that piggyBac transposase can be active when fused to a heterologous DNA-binding domain. An Exc+Int− transposase, the intrinsic targeting of which is defective, might also be a useful intermediate in generating a transposase whose integration activity could be rescued and redirected by fusion to a site-specific DNA-binding domain. We show that fusion to two designed zinc finger proteins rescued the Int− phenotype. Successful guided transgene integration into genomic DNA would have broad applications to gene therapy and molecular genetics. Thus, an Exc+Int− transposase is a potentially useful reagent for genome engineering and provides insight into the mechanism of transposase–target DNA interaction.

[1]  F. Dyda,et al.  The emerging diversity of transpososome architectures , 2012, Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.

[2]  S. Kawakami,et al.  piggyBac Transposon-mediated Long-term Gene Expression in Mice , 2010, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[3]  Alfred L George,et al.  Manipulating piggyBac transposon chromosomal integration site selection in human cells. , 2011, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[4]  M. Kay,et al.  Somatic integration and long-term transgene expression in normal and haemophilic mice using a DNA transposon system , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[5]  Z. Izsvák,et al.  Translating Sleeping Beauty transposition into cellular therapies: Victories and challenges , 2010, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[6]  C. Bauser,et al.  Excision of the piggyBac transposable element in vitro is a precise event that is enhanced by the expression of its encoded transposase , 1996, Genetica.

[7]  S. Moisyadi,et al.  Chimeric piggyBac transposases for genomic targeting in human cells , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[8]  T. VandenDriessche,et al.  PiggyBac toolbox. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  M. Sudoł,et al.  Use of Patient-Derived Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrases To Identify a Protein Residue That Affects Target Site Selection , 2001, Journal of Virology.

[10]  Sridhar Hannenhalli,et al.  Selection of Target Sites for Mobile DNA Integration in the Human Genome , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  J. Boeke,et al.  Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: A useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR‐mediated gene disruption and other applications , 1998, Yeast.

[12]  Min Han,et al.  Efficient Transposition of the piggyBac (PB) Transposon in Mammalian Cells and Mice , 2005, Cell.

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[14]  Torsten Schaller,et al.  HIV Integration Targeting: A Pathway Involving Transportin-3 and the Nuclear Pore Protein RanBP2 , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[15]  H. G. Wang,et al.  Transposon mutagenesis of baculoviruses: analysis of Trichoplusia ni transposon IFP2 insertions within the FP-locus of nuclear polyhedrosis viruses. , 1989, Virology.

[16]  N. Craig,et al.  Hyperactive piggyBac gene transfer in human cells and in vivo. , 2012, Human gene therapy.

[17]  F. Bushman,et al.  A resurrected mammalian hAT transposable element and a closely related insect element are highly active in human cell culture , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  A. Bradley,et al.  Generation of transgene-free induced pluripotent mouse stem cells by the piggyBac transposon , 2009, Nature Methods.

[19]  R. Mitra,et al.  Functional characterization of piggyBat from the bat Myotis lucifugus unveils an active mammalian DNA transposon , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Todd E Scheetz,et al.  A Hyperactive Transposase Promotes Persistent Gene Transfer of a piggyBac DNA Transposon , 2012, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids.

[21]  M. Fraser,et al.  Mutational analysis of highly conserved aspartate residues essential to the catalytic core of the piggyBac transposase , 2008, BMC Molecular Biology.

[22]  Lia S. Campos,et al.  PiggyBac Transposon Mutagenesis: A Tool for Cancer Gene Discovery in Mice , 2010, Science.

[23]  N. Craig,et al.  piggyBac can bypass DNA synthesis during cut and paste transposition , 2008, The EMBO journal.

[24]  R. Müller,et al.  Regulatable promoters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: comparison of transcriptional activity and their use for heterologous expression. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  Kosuke Yusa,et al.  Mobilization of giant piggyBac transposons in the mouse genome , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  Matthew H. Wilson,et al.  PiggyBac transposon-based inducible gene expression in vivo after somatic cell gene transfer. , 2009, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[27]  M. Johnston,et al.  “Calling Cards” for DNA-Binding Proteins in Mammalian Cells , 2012, Genetics.

[28]  A. Bradley,et al.  A hyperactive piggyBac transposase for mammalian applications , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  David G. Melvin,et al.  Chromosomal transposition of PiggyBac in mouse embryonic stem cells , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Craig J. Coates,et al.  piggyBac is a flexible and highly active transposon as compared to Sleeping Beauty, Tol2, and Mos1 in mammalian cells , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Wei Chen,et al.  Retargeting sleeping beauty transposon insertions by engineered zinc finger DNA-binding domains. , 2012, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[32]  B. Hirt Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures. , 1967, Journal of molecular biology.