Firms' knowledge acquisition during dual-track VET: Which sources are important for innovativeness?

Researchers debate for more than 3 decades on the effect of vocational training on innovations. While some studies show a negative effect of vocational education that firms organize on its own, other studies show a positive effect for vocational education that is organized on a sectoral or national level such as in Germany or Switzerland. A characteristic of these vocational education and training (VET) systems is a high level of standardization and regulation. In fact many elements of VET are regulated in national law, training ordinances and curricula, but firms nevertheless less still have a high flexibility when it comes to the organization of workplace training. In this paper we analyze how firms organize their workplace training, which training methods they use and which training methods they apply jointly. As each training method e.g. training during work or external courses, transfers a specific set of skills and knowledge to apprentices, we analyze how firms use training methods to promote their innovation activity. Our results show that there is a large variety in the organization of workplace training. In sum firms make use of the flexibility to design workplace training that fits their needs best. We conclude with implications for the design of VET systems and firms.

[1]  Heinz Hollenstein,et al.  Innovation modes in the Swiss service sector: a cluster analysis based on firm-level data , 2003 .

[2]  G. Becker,et al.  Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis , 1962, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  Stefan C. Wolter,et al.  Why Some Firms Train Apprentices and Many Others Do Not , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  Felix Wenzelmann,et al.  Kosten und Nutzen der dualen Ausbildung aus Sicht der Betriebe , 2016 .

[5]  Peer C. Fiss A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations , 2007 .

[6]  M. Stevens A THEORETICAL MODEL OF ON-THE-JOB TRAINING WITH IMPERFECT COMPETITION , 1994 .

[7]  Peer C. Fiss Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[8]  Higher Education and Innovation , 2008 .

[9]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  The Structure of Wages and Investment in General Training , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[11]  Johannes Meuer,et al.  Layers of co-existing innovation systems , 2015 .

[12]  Sandra Lowe,et al.  Redesigning Social Inquiry Fuzzy Sets And Beyond , 2016 .

[13]  Krishna B. Kumar,et al.  Us-Europe Differences in Technology-Driven Growth: Quantifying the Role of Education , 2003 .

[14]  G. Becker,et al.  Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Third Edition , 1993 .

[15]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[16]  Vilmos F. Misangyi,et al.  Substitutes or Complements? A Configurational Examination of Corporate Governance Mechanisms , 2014 .

[17]  S. Wolter,et al.  The financing of apprenticeship training in the light of labor market regulations , 2010 .

[18]  Gregory Jackson,et al.  Chapter 6 Understanding Complementarities as Organizational Configurations: Using Set Theoretical Methods , 2013 .

[19]  Uschi Backes-Gellner,et al.  High quality workplace training and innovation in highly developed countries , 2012 .

[20]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[21]  Adrian Duşa,et al.  Qualitative comparative analysis , 2015 .

[22]  Günter Walden,et al.  Kosten und Nutzen der betrieblichen Berufsausbildung , 2007 .