Experimental analysis of the extension to shear fracture transition in Berea Sandstone

Experimental Analysis of the Extension to Shear Fracture Transition in Berea Sandstone. (August 2005) Jennifer Kay Bobich, B.S., Penn State University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Fred Chester To characterize low-pressure, brittle deformation in porous, granular rock, notchcut cylinders (30 mm neck diameter) of Berea Sandstone were extended in a triaxial apparatus from 10 to 160 MPa confining pressure at strain rates of 10 s and 10 s. Acoustic emission counts were monitored when extending samples at a slow strain rate. Stress at fracture is characterized by the least compressive principal stress, σ3, and maximum compressive principal stress, σ1 (σ1 = Pc). A change in strength dependence on pressure at Pc = 50 MPa corresponds to a change from pure macroscopic extension fracture to mixed-mode opening and shear fracture, and likely reflects the increase in mean stress that suppresses the propagation of extension fractures and the interaction between closely-spaced stepped cracks. Within the extension fracture regime (Pc 50 MPa, σ3 at failure becomes more compressive with an increase in Pc and follows Coulomb behavior; however, the angle between the fracture surface and σ1 increases continuously with Pc. Fracture surfaces characteristic of the extension to shear fracture transition appear as linked, stepped extension fractures; the length of extensional segments decreases with increasing pressure. The onset of acoustic emissions and

[1]  Lawrence W. Teufel,et al.  Hydraulic-fracture propagation in layered rock: experimental studies of fracture containment , 1984 .

[2]  Pierre Bésuelle,et al.  Experimental characterisation of the localisation phenomenon inside a Vosges sandstone in a triaxial cell , 2000 .

[3]  D. Cruden.  Single-increment creep experiments on rock under uniaxial compression , 1971 .

[4]  Melvin Friedman,et al.  Experimental Deformation of Sedimentary Rocks Under Confining Pressure: Pore Pressure Tests , 1963 .

[5]  H. C. Heard.  Chapter 7: Transition from Brittle Fracture to Ductile Flow in Solenhofen Limestone as a Function of Temperature, Confining Pressure, and Interstitial Fluid Pressure , 1960 .

[6]  Frederick M. Chester,et al.  Hybrid fracture and the transition from extension fracture to shear fracture , 2004, Nature.

[7]  J. E. Russell,et al.  Mechanisms of fracture propagation in experimentally extended Sioux quartzite , 1990 .

[8]  J. C. Jaeger.  "Elasticity, Fracture and Flow": With Engineering And Geological Applications , 1971 .

[9]  P. Bésuelle.  Compacting and dilating shear bands in porous rock: Theoretical and experimental conditions , 2001 .

[10]  T. Wong,et al.  Micromechanics of pressure-induced grain crushing in porous rocks , 1990 .

[11]  Laurent G. J. Montési,et al.  Shear-enhanced compaction and permeability reduction: Triaxial extension tests on porous sandstone , 1997 .

[12]  E. M. Anderson,et al.  The dynamics of faulting : and dyke formation with applications to Britain , 1953, Geological Magazine.

[13]  D. Pollard,et al.  Microstructure of deformation bands in porous sandstones at Arches National Park, Utah : Journal of Structural Geology, 16(7), 1994, pp 941–959 , 1994 .

[14]  R. Schock,et al.  Strain behavior of a granite and a Graywacke sandstone in tension , 1982 .

[15]  H. C. Heard,et al.  The Brittle-ductile transition in rocks : the Heard volume , 1990 .

[16]  Beatriz Menéndez,et al.  Micromechanics of brittle faulting and cataclastic flow in Berea sandstone , 1996 .

[17]  E. Rodriguez.  A microstructural study of the extension-to-shear fracture transition in Carrara Marble , 2005 .

[18]  Steven D. Glaser,et al.  Acoustic emissions produced by discrete fracture in rock part 2—Kinematics of crack growth during controlled Mode I and Mode II loading of rock , 1992 .

[19]  Richard H. Sibson,et al.  Structural permeability of fluid-driven fault-fracture meshes , 1996 .

[20]  K. Issen,et al.  Conditions for compaction band formation in porous rock using a two-yield surface model , 2004 .

[21]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  A statistical evaluation of intact rock failure criteria constrained by polyaxial test data for five different rocks , 2002 .

[22]  M. Antonellini,et al.  Effect of Faulting on Fluid Flow in Porous Sandstones: Petrophysical Properties , 1994 .

[23]  Kiyoo Mogi,et al.  Effect of the intermediate principal stress on rock failure , 1967 .

[24]  Rolf Brzesowsky,et al.  Micromechanics of sand grain failure and sand compaction , 1995 .

[25]  F. Christiansen.  The Dynamics of Faulting and Dyke Formation with Application to Britain , 1954 .

[26]  D. Pollard,et al.  Progress in understanding jointing over the past century , 1988 .

[27]  David J. Hart,et al.  Laboratory measurements of a complete set of poroelastic moduli for Berea sandstone and Indiana limestone , 1995 .

[28]  Marco Antonellini,et al.  Compaction bands: a structural analog for anti-mode I cracks in aeolian sandstone , 1996 .

[29]  John E. Hilliard,et al.  Stereology and Stochastic Geometry , 2003 .

[30]  W. F. Brace,et al.  Limits on lithospheric stress imposed by laboratory experiments , 1980 .

[31]  J. J. Gallagher,et al.  Experimental studies relating to microfracture in sandstone , 1974 .

[32]  M. Antonellini,et al.  Effect of Faulting on Fluid Flow in Porous Sandstones: Geometry and Spatial Distribution , 1995 .

[33]  Teng-fong Wong,et al.  The transition from brittle faulting to cataclastic flow in porous sandstones: Mechanical deformation , 1997 .

[34]  J. Ramsay.  Folding and fracturing of rocks , 1967 .

[35]  A. Aydin,et al.  Dilation bands: A new form of localized failure in granular media , 2002 .