Initial Results of the MINDView PET Insert Inside the 3T mMR

Hybrid molecular and anatomical imaging devices, especially when simultaneously working, have shown to provide advantages over sequential acquisitions. In particular, we present in this preliminary study, the working performance of a brain positron emission tomography (PET) insert, within a 3T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system. To our knowledge, this is the largest PET system based on monolithic LYSO blocks. It consists of 60 scintillator blocks of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$50\ \text{mm} \times 50\ \text{mm} \times 20\ \text{mm}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> arranged in 3 rings of 20 detector modules each. An effective field of view (FOV) of 240 mm in diameter and 154 mm axially is defined. The crystals included a retroreflector layer at the entrance face, and are coupled to custom arrays of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$12 \times 12$ </tex-math></inline-formula> silicon photomultipliers (SiPM), <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3\ \text{mm} \times 3\ \text{mm}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> each. Frontend electronics provide <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${X}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">${Y}$ </tex-math></inline-formula> projections of the scintillation light by sampling each row and column of the SiPM arrays. The insert is thermally stabilized by using temperature-controlled air to about 27 °C. The PET insert has been installed at the Klinikum rechts der Isar (Munich) and tested within the whole-body Siemens biograph mMR, a 3T MRI combined with a PET scanner. A system sensitivity of almost 7% for an energy window of 350–650 keV was measured using a small size source at the center of the FOV (CFOV). Current system evaluation showed a spatial resolution at the CFOV of 1.7 mm using iterative algorithms, being below 2 mm within a centered diameter of 120 mm. Rods of a small Derenzo phantom of 2.5 mm were clearly resolved, independently of all tested MRI sequences including echo-planar imaging, ultrashort time echo, MPrage, and T2-flair or arterial spin labeling. The PET insert did not show any count rate degradation also under those sequences for a variety of MR imaging acquisitions.

[1]  Jörg Felder,et al.  Advances in multimodal neuroimaging: hybrid MR-PET and MR-PET-EEG at 3 T and 9.4 T. , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[2]  Yong Choi,et al.  MR insertable brain PET using tileable GAPD arrays , 2010 .

[3]  K-J Langen,et al.  High resolution BrainPET combined with simultaneous MRI , 2011, Nuklearmedizin.

[4]  Filomeno Sánchez,et al.  A Method to Measure the Intrinsic Detector Resolution on Monolithic Crystals , 2017, 2017 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC).

[5]  Pablo Conde,et al.  A PET Design Based on SiPM and Monolithic LYSO Crystals: Performance Evaluation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Didier Benoit,et al.  CASToR: a generic data organization and processing code framework for multi-modal and multi-dimensional tomographic reconstruction , 2018, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Antonio J. González,et al.  The MINDView brain PET detector, feasibility study based on SiPM arrays , 2016 .

[8]  J. Benlloch,et al.  Implementation and analysis of list mode algorithm using tubes of response on a dedicated brain and breast PET , 2013 .

[9]  Tony Abraham,et al.  Evolution of brain imaging instrumentation. , 2011, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  George Loudos,et al.  TRIMAGE: A dedicated trimodality (PET/MR/EEG) imaging tool for schizophrenia , 2018, European Psychiatry.

[11]  Qinan Bao,et al.  Performance Evaluation of the Inveon Dedicated PET Preclinical Tomograph Based on the NEMA NU-4 Standards , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Eiji Yoshida,et al.  Feasibility of a brain-dedicated PET-MRI system using four-layer DOI detectors integrated with an RF head coil , 2014 .

[14]  Julien Bert,et al.  The MINDVIEW project: First results , 2018, European Psychiatry.

[15]  T. Beyer,et al.  PET/MRI for Oncologic Brain Imaging: A Comparison of Standard MR-Based Attenuation Corrections with a Model-Based Approach for the Siemens mMR PET/MR System , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[16]  Pablo Conde,et al.  Performance Study of a Large Monolithic LYSO PET Detector With Accurate Photon DOI Using Retroreflector Layers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[17]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Antonio J. González,et al.  Performance characteristics of the MAMMOCARE PET system based on NEMA standard , 2017 .

[19]  Eiji Yoshida,et al.  Development of 1.45-mm resolution four-layer DOI–PET detector for simultaneous measurement in 3T MRI , 2014, Radiological Physics and Technology.