Bees encode behaviorally significant spectral relationships in complex scenes to resolve stimulus ambiguity.

Bees, like humans, can continue to see a surface from its color even when the scene's global illuminant changes (which is a phenomenon called color constancy). It is not known, however, whether they can also generate color-constant behavior in more natural complex scenes that are lit by multiple lights simultaneously, conditions in which most computational models of color constancy fail. To test whether they can indeed solve this more complex problem, bumblebees were raised in a highly controlled, yet ecological relevant environment consisting of a matrix of 64 artificial flowers under four spatially distinct lights. As in nature, the bees had no direct access to spectral information about the illuminants or flowers. Furthermore, the background of all of the flowers in the matrix was black, independent of illumination. The stimulus information presented to the bee was, therefore, far more constrained than that normally experienced in nature. And yet, bees learned to identify the rewarded flowers in each differently illuminated region of the matrix, even when the illumination of one of the regions was switched with one the bees had not previously experienced. These results suggest that bees can generate color-constant behavior by encoding empirically significant contrast relationships between statistically dependent, but visually distinct, stimulus elements of scenes.

[1]  F. Prete Complex worlds from simpler nervous systems , 2004 .

[2]  W. Nagel Handbuch der Physiologie des Menschen. , 1905 .

[3]  D. Purves,et al.  The effects of color on brightness , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Seeing the light: illumination as a contextual cue to color choice behavior in bumblebees. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  R. Beau Lotto Visual Development: Experience Puts the Colour in Life , 2004, Current Biology.

[6]  L. Chittka,et al.  Biological significance of distinguishing between similar colours in spectrally variable illumination: bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) as a case study , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[7]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Optimal Sets of Color Receptors and Color Opponent Systems for Coding of Natural Objects in Insect Vision , 1996 .

[8]  Christa Neumeyer,et al.  Chromatic adaptation in the honeybee: Successive color contrast and color constancy , 1981, Journal of comparative physiology.

[9]  Lars Chittka,et al.  The colour hexagon: a chromaticity diagram based on photoreceptor excitations as a generalized representation of colour opponency , 1992, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  A. Dyer Broad spectral sensitivities in the honeybee's photoreceptors limit colour constancy , 1999, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[11]  Daniel Osorio,et al.  Colourful objects through animal eyes , 2001 .

[12]  R. Menzel,et al.  Color constancy in the honeybee , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Menzel,et al.  Chromatic properties of interneurons in the optic lobes of the bee , 1977, Journal of comparative physiology.

[14]  D. Purves,et al.  An empirical explanation of color contrast. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Hurlbert,et al.  Four issues concerning colour constancy and relational colour constancy , 1997, Vision Research.

[16]  Dale Purves,et al.  An Empirical Explanation of the Chubb Illusion , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  M. S. Drew,et al.  Color constancy - Generalized diagonal transforms suffice , 1994 .