The Cervical Spine of the American Barn Owl (Tyto furcata pratincola): I. Anatomy of the Vertebrae and Regionalization in Their S-Shaped Arrangement

Background Owls possess an extraordinary neck and head mobility. To understand this mobility it is necessary to have an anatomical description of cervical vertebrae with an emphasis on those criteria that are relevant for head positioning. No functional description specific to owls is available. Methodology/Principal findings X-ray films and micro-CT scans were recorded from American barn owls (Tyto furcata pratincola) and used to obtain three-dimensional head movements and three-dimensional models of the 14 cervical vertebrae (C1−C14). The diameter of the vertebral canal, the zygapophyseal protrusion, the distance between joint centers, and the pitching angle were quantified. Whereas the first two variables are purely osteological characteristics of single vertebrae, the latter two take into account interactions between vertebrae. These variables change in characteristic ways from cranial to caudal. The vertebral canal is wide in the cranial and caudal neck regions, but narrow in the middle, where both the zygapophyseal protrusion and the distance between joint centers are large. Pitching angles are more negative in the cranial and caudal neck regions than in the middle region. Cluster analysis suggested a complex regionalization. Whereas the borders (C1 and C13/C14) formed stable clusters, the other cervical vertebrae were sorted into 4 or 5 additional clusters. The borders of the clusters were influenced by the variables analyzed. Conclusions/Significance A statistical analysis was used to evaluate the regionalization of the cervical spine in the barn owl. While earlier measurements have shown that there appear to be three regions of flexibility of the neck, our indicators suggest 3–7 regions. These many regions allow a high degree of flexibility, potentially facilitating the large head turns that barn owls are able to make. The cervical vertebral series of other species should also be investigated using statistical criteria to further characterize morphology and the potential movements associated with it.

[1]  D. B. Baier,et al.  X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology (XROMM): precision, accuracy and applications in comparative biomechanics research. , 2010, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[2]  E. Seiferle,et al.  Anatomie der Vögel , 1992 .

[3]  E. A. Buchholtz,et al.  Anatomical transformation in mammals: developmental origin of aberrant cervical anatomy in tree sloths , 2009, Evolution & development.

[4]  Michael Klaas,et al.  Morphometric characterisation of wing feathers of the barn owl Tyto alba pratincola and the pigeon Columba livia , 2007, Frontiers in Zoology.

[5]  R. Bout,et al.  Evolutionary Morphology of the Neck System in Ratites, Fowl and Waterfowl , 2001 .

[6]  Alexander Petrovitch,et al.  Limb kinematics during locomotion in the two-toed sloth (Choloepus didactylus, Xenarthra) and its implications for the evolution of the sloth locomotor apparatus. , 2010, Zoology.

[7]  A. Christian,et al.  Reconstruction of the cervical skeleton posture of Brachiosaurus brancai Janensch, 1914 by an analysis of the intervertebral stress along the neck and a comparison with the results of different approaches , 2007 .

[8]  C. Tambussi,et al.  Flexibility along the Neck of the Neogene Terror Bird Andalgalornis steulleti (Aves Phorusrhacidae) , 2012, PloS one.

[9]  Ehud Rivlin,et al.  On the barn owl’s visual pre-attack behavior: I. Structure of head movements and motion patterns , 2006, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[10]  David B Baier,et al.  Scientific rotoscoping: a morphology-based method of 3-D motion analysis and visualization. , 2010, Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology.

[11]  E. Knudsen,et al.  Horizontal and vertical components of head movement are controlled by distinct neural circuits in the barn owl , 1990, Nature.

[12]  M. Fischer,et al.  Evolution of chameleon locomotion, or how to become arboreal as a reptile. , 2010, Zoology.

[13]  E. Rayfield,et al.  Inter-Vertebral Flexibility of the Ostrich Neck: Implications for Estimating Sauropod Neck Flexibility , 2013, PloS one.

[14]  D. Naish The inner bird: anatomy and evolution , 2011 .

[15]  Fionn Murtagh,et al.  Cluster Dissection and Analysis: Theory, Fortran Programs, Examples. , 1986 .

[16]  A. Berthoz,et al.  The orientation of the cervical vertebral column in unrestrained awake animals , 1986, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  R. Bout,et al.  Postures of the avian craniocervical column , 1997, Journal of morphology.

[18]  J. Laidlaw,et al.  ANATOMY OF THE HUMAN BODY , 1967, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[19]  K. A. Stevens,et al.  Neck posture and feeding habits of two jurassic sauropod dinosaurs , 1999, Science.

[20]  Andreas Christian,et al.  Flexibility along the neck of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) and consequences for the reconstruction of dinosaurs with extreme neck length , 2007, Journal of morphology.

[21]  P. Gailloud,et al.  Adaptations of the Owl's Cervical & Cephalic Arteries in Relation to Extreme Neck Rotation , 2013 .

[22]  Noble S. Proctor,et al.  Manual of Ornithology: Avian Structure and Function , 1993 .

[23]  M J Steinbach,et al.  Eye movements of the owl. , 1973, Vision research.