Nanotechnology, often referred to as the next industrial revolution after the internet, is an interdisciplinary
study and the wave of the future. It is the science of manipulating technology at an atomic and molecular
scale and is no longer an issue for scientists only. It has limitless potential and can be used in most areas of
human need. Based on very optimistic results in many scientific researches around the world, it can easily
be inferred that its limitless promises will bring epoch making changes in the world very soon. There are
already over 2,000 consumer products in the market which are developed containing nanoparticle and that
use nanotechnology. However, there are also concerns as there are many who consider nanoparticles as the next asbestos and are reluctant to welcome nanotechnology with an open mind. This is a matter of great concern that the global community is still in search of a consensus on legal and regulatory frameworks to govern it. As of now, there are many areas i.e. product safety, privacy and civil
liberties, occupational health and safety ('OH&S'), intellectual property ('IP'), international law, environmental law, law of insurance, law of customs, consumer protection and waste management which are directly
related to nanotechnology research, development and commercialisation, and the law must intervene in
these areas. While the benefits that can be achieved by using nanotechnology are whole-heartedly welcomed and appreciated, this paper aims at introducing the legal aspects of nanotechnology with an appeal that the development of nanotechnology should be regulated properly and the scientist must not be given a blank cheque in their hands to make experiments that may create adverse effects. The mistakes which halted the introduction and commercialisation of genetically modified food or nuclear energy should not be repeated and the application of nanotechnology should be encouraged within the approved legal framework.
[1]
Barbara Herr Harthorn,et al.
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices
,
2012,
Journal of Nanoparticle Research.
[2]
Andrew D. Maynard,et al.
Don't define nanomaterials
,
2011,
Nature.
[3]
Khaled Radad,et al.
Recent advances in benefits and hazards of engineered nanoparticles.
,
2012,
Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.
[4]
Sujit Bhattacharya,et al.
China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race
,
2012,
Scientometrics.
[5]
O. Renn,et al.
Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance
,
2006,
Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.
[6]
Graeme Hodge,et al.
New Global Frontiers in Regulation: The Age of Nanotechnology
,
2009
.
[7]
M. Hassan,et al.
Small Things and Big Changes in the Developing World
,
2005,
Science.
[8]
P. Shapira,et al.
Follow the money
,
2010,
Nature.
[9]
Gibson Peter,et al.
Considerations on a Definition of Nanomaterial for Regulatory Purposes
,
2010
.
[10]
Igor Linkov,et al.
Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits
,
2009
.
[11]
Bolarín Miró,et al.
Nanotechnology and environment: Safety and health in exposure to nanoparticles and ceramics.
,
2012
.