Using Social Cognition and Persuasion to Promote Energy Conservation: A Quasi‐Experiment

A quasi-experiment was conducted to determine if the effectiveness of the R.C.S. Home Energy Audit Program could be improved by training auditors to use social-psychological principles during the audit procedure. Nine experienced home energy auditors attended two 1-day workshops in which they were trained to: (a) communicate vividly; (b) personalize their recommendations to homeowners; (c) induce commitment; and (d) frame their recommendations in terms of “loss” rather than “gain”. The effectiveness of the trained auditors was compared with a control group of experienced auditors who did not receive specific training. Both telephone interview data and utility company records pointed to the success of the auditor training. In interviews, customers served by the trained auditors reported a greater likelihood of acting on the auditors' recommendations, and a large number of these customers reported applying for utility programs to finance retrofits. Utility records validated these customer claims: A significantly larger number of customers served by trained auditors actually did apply for retrofit finance programs. A longitudinal measure of actual energy consumption showed no difference between experimental and control households. Taken as a whole, these findings demonstrate the potential for using principles uncovered in the social psychological laboratory to design applied interventions.

[1]  F. J. Roethlisberger,et al.  Management and the Worker , 1941 .

[2]  J. Freedman,et al.  Compliance without pressure: the foot-in-the-door technique. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  S H Schwartz,et al.  Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: an experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[5]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Attribution and the psychology of prediction. , 1975 .

[6]  M. Pallak,et al.  Commitment and Voluntary Energy Conservation , 1976 .

[7]  R. H. Franke,et al.  The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. , 1978 .

[8]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[9]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[10]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[11]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[12]  E. Hirst,et al.  Review of utility home energy audit programs , 1980 .

[13]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Insensitivity to sample bias: Generalizing from atypical cases , 1980 .

[14]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[15]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  The Impact of Enriching Case and Statistical Information on Consumer Judgments , 1982 .

[16]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Energy Conservation Research of California's Utilities , 1984 .

[17]  Thomas F. Pettigrew,et al.  Improving utility conservation programs: Outcomes, interventions, and evaluations , 1984 .

[18]  Lynn Langmeyer.  A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. , 1984 .

[19]  Brown,et al.  Role of auditor sales effectiveness in residential conservation incentive programs: a case study at Florida Power and Light , 1986 .

[20]  T. Pettigrew,et al.  Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. , 1986 .

[21]  Elliot Aronson,et al.  Energy use: the human dimension , 1986 .