Cue Compatibility and Framing in Advertising

Findings from a laboratory experiment support three research propositions on how processing goals at ad exposure and retrieval cues in the brand decision environment affect recall of communication effects and ad and brand judgments. The first proposition, the “cue compatibility principle,” is that compatibility or a match between the type of information stored in memory at encoding and the type of information present as cues at retrieval is necessary for successful recall of communication effects (e.g., cognitive responses). The second proposition is that though retrieval cues can facilitate recall of strongly associated information, they can inhibit recall of other, less strongly associated information in memory. The third proposition is that because processing goals and retrieval cues affect the accessibility and diagnosticity of communication effects, they “frame” brand judgments by influencing (1) the importance or weight placed on different types of communication effects in ad and brand judgments, and therefore (2) the actual favorableness of the judgments reached. The theoretical and managerial implications of these memory factors on advertising effectiveness are discussed.

[1]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  The Information Processing of Coordinated Media Campaigns , 1989 .

[2]  R S Nickerson,et al.  Retrieval inhibition from part-set cuing: A persisting enigma in memory research , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[4]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Advertising Effects on Attributes Recalled and Criteria Used for Brand Evaluations , 1983 .

[5]  D. Kahneman.  Attention and Effort , 1973 .

[6]  E. Tulving,et al.  Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words , 1966 .

[7]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  The Relation of Cognitive and Memorial Processes to Persuasion in a Simulated Jury Trial , 1974 .

[8]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[9]  Peter Wright,et al.  Product Class Advertising Effects on First-Time Buyers' Decision Strategies , 1980 .

[10]  E. Tulving,et al.  Retrieval processes in recognition memory: Effects of associative context , 1971 .

[11]  Richard J. Lutz,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[12]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Cue-dependent forgetting. , 1974 .

[13]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Availability and interference in predictive judgment. , 1984 .

[14]  C. W. Park,et al.  Consumer Response to Television Commercials: The Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation , 1986 .

[15]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Situational Importance of Recall and Inference in Consumer Decision Making , 1988 .

[17]  E. Tulving,et al.  Retroactive inhibition in free recall: Inaccessibility of information available in the memory store , 1971 .

[18]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[19]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied linear statistical models : regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs , 1974 .

[20]  Raymond R. Burke,et al.  Competitive Interference and Consumer Memory for Advertising , 1988 .

[21]  Richard J. Lutz,et al.  Attitude Toward the Ad As a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: Determinants and Consequences , 1983 .

[22]  W. Brogden.  Annual Review of Psychology , 1957 .

[23]  Wayne A. Wickel.  HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY , 1981 .

[24]  Endel Tulving,et al.  Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. , 1973 .

[25]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Using Information Processing Theory to Design Marketing Strategies , 1981 .

[26]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Inhibition in recall from cueing with recall targets , 1973 .

[27]  Ida E. Berger,et al.  The Effect of Advertising on Attitude Accessibility, Attitude Confidence, and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship , 1989 .

[28]  H L Roediger,et al.  Inhibiting effects of recall , 1974, Memory & cognition.

[29]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  The Effects of Part-List Cuing on Attribute Recall: Problem Framing At the Point of Retrieval , 1985 .

[30]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[31]  John A. Quelch,et al.  Advertising and Promotion Management , 1987 .

[32]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Memory and Evaluation Effects in Competitive Advertising Environments , 1991 .

[33]  Kevin Lane Keller.  Memory Factors in Advertising: The Effect of Advertising Retrieval Cues on Brand Evaluations , 1987 .

[34]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing , 1986 .

[35]  Gabriel J. Biehal,et al.  Consumers' Use of Memory and External Information in Choice: Macro and Micro Perspectives , 1986 .

[36]  Amitava Chattopadhyay,et al.  Effects of Context and Part-Category Cues on Recall of Competing Brands , 1985 .

[37]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Choices from Sets Including Remembered Brands: Use of Recalled Attributes and Prior Overall Evaluations , 1988 .

[38]  A. A. Mitchell,et al.  The Effect of Verbal and Visual Components of Advertisements on Brand Attitudes and Attitude Toward the Advertisement , 1986 .

[39]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attention in Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute Importance , 1986 .

[40]  Michael L. Ray,et al.  Marketing communication and the hierarchy-of-effects , 1973 .

[41]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[42]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[43]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Does Attitude toward the Ad Affect Brand Attitude under a Brand Evaluation Set? , 1985 .

[44]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Assessing the Role of Brand-Related Cognitive Responses as Mediators of Communication Effects on Cognitive Structure , 1989 .

[45]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Audience Involvement in Advertising: Four Levels , 1984 .

[46]  Dewey Rundus,et al.  Negative effects of using list items as recall cues , 1973 .

[47]  John H. Lingle,et al.  Retrieval selectivity in memory-based impression judgments. , 1979 .

[48]  A. A. Lumsdaine.  Communication and persuasion , 1954 .

[49]  William E. Baker,et al.  The Relevance Accessibility Model of Advertising Effectiveness , 1991 .

[50]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers , 1987 .

[51]  Merrie Brucks,et al.  Selective Recall and Information Use in Consumer Preferences , 1992 .

[52]  Meryl P Gardner,et al.  Low Involvement Strategies for Processing Advertisements , 1985 .