Self and Collective: Cognition and Social Context

The relationship between the self and the collective is discussed from the perspective of self-categorization theory. Self-categorization theory makes a basic distinction between personal and social identity as different levels of self-categorization. It shows how the emergent properties of group processes can be explained in terms of a shift in self perception from personal to social identity. It also elucidates how self-categorization varies with the social context. It argues that self-categorizing is inherently variable, fluid, and context dependent, as sedf-categories are social comparative and are always relative to a frame of reference. This notion has major implications for accepted ways of thinking about the self: The variability of self-categorizing provides the perceiver with behavioral and cognitive flexibility and ensures that cognition is always shaped by the social context in which it takes place.

[1]  John C. Turner,et al.  Group polarization as conformity to the prototypical group member , 1992 .

[2]  Cognitive aspects of prejudice. , 1969 .

[3]  M. Hogg,et al.  Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. , 1989 .

[4]  John C. Turner,et al.  Self-categorization theory and social influence. , 1989 .

[5]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[6]  D. A. Wilder,et al.  Assimilation and contrast effects in the judgments of groups. , 1988 .

[7]  John C. Turner,et al.  Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 2: The relationship between frame of reference, self‐categorization and accentuation , 1992 .

[8]  H. Markus,et al.  THE DYNAMIC SELF-CONCEPT: A Social Psychological Perspective , 1987 .

[9]  U. Neisser Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization , 1989 .

[10]  B. Hayes,et al.  Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference , 1992 .

[11]  M. Hogg,et al.  Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories , 1987 .

[12]  Audrey J. Murrell,et al.  Reducing intergroup bias: The benefits of recategorization. , 1989 .

[13]  John C. Turner,et al.  Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations , 1991 .

[14]  John C. Turner,et al.  Polarized Norms and Social Frames of Reference: A Test of the Self-Categorization Theory of Group Polarization , 1990 .

[15]  J. Turner,et al.  The effects of categorization on social judgement , 1992 .