Modelling Vessel Traffic Service to understand resilience in everyday operations

Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) is a service to promote traffic fluency and safety in the entrance to ports. This article's purpose has been to explore everyday operations of the VTS system to gain insights in how it contributes to safe and efficient traffic movements. Interviews, focus groups and an observation have been conducted to collect data about everyday operations, as well as to grasp how the VTS system adapts to changing operational conditions. The results show that work within the VTS domain is highly complex and that the two systems modelled realise their services vastly differently, which in turn affects the systems' ability to monitor, respond and anticipate. This is of great importance to consider whenever changes are planned and implemented within the VTS domain. Only if everyday operations are properly analysed and understood, it can be estimated how alterations to technology and organisation will affect the overall system performance.

[1]  Michael Ekow Manuel.  Maritime Risk and Organizational Learning , 2011 .

[2]  Sheng-Long Kao,et al.  A Fuzzy Logic Method for Collision Avoidance in Vessel Traffic Service , 2007 .

[3]  Eric Rigaud,et al.  Proceedings of the third resilience engineering symposium, October 28-30, 2008 Antibes – Juan-les-Pins, France , 2008 .

[4]  Monica Lundh,et al.  Exploring non-technical miscommunication in vessel traffic service operation , 2012, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[5]  Walter Schön,et al.  Interdisciplinary safety analysis of complex socio-technological systems based on the functional resonance accident model: An application to railway trafficsupervision , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  C. S. Holling.  Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[7]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[8]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  The Alaska Airlines Flight 261 accident : A systemic analysis of functional resonance , 2007 .

[9]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  Information environment, fatigue, and culture in the maritime domain , 2011 .

[10]  Thomas Porathe.  Transmitting intended and suggested routes in ship operations: cognitive off-loading by placing knowledge in the world. , 2012, Work.

[11]  E. Hollnagel.  FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method: Modelling Complex Socio-technical Systems , 2012 .

[12]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  Patient safety investigation through the lens of FRAM , 2010 .

[13]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Resilience Engineering approach to safety assessment: an application of FRAM for the MSAW system. , 2009 .

[14]  Paulo Victor Rodrigues de Carvalho,et al.  The use of Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  K. Weick.  Organizational Culture as a Source of High Reliability , 1987 .

[16]  Max Mulder,et al.  ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN FOR VESSEL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT: A THEORETICAL OVERVIEW , 2006 .

[17]  R. Asariotis,et al.  Review of Maritime Transport, 2014 , 2010 .

[18]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Ship voyage plan coordination in the MONALISA project: user tests of a prototype ship traffic management system , 2014 .

[19]  Tarcisio Abreu Saurin,et al.  The design of scenario-based training from the resilience engineering perspective: a study with grid electricians. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Foundations of Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2005 .

[21]  Jan Hovden,et al.  Leading indicators applied to maintenance in the framework of resilience engineering : A conceptual approach. , 2008 .

[22]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2006 .

[23]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Joint Cognitive Systems , 2006 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[25]  M. Sciotti,et al.  Decision support platforms for Satellite-Extended Vessel Traffic Services , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Radar.

[26]  Lisa Loloma Froholdt,et al.  Getting closer to context: a case study of communication between ship and shore in an emergency situation , 2010 .

[27]  Paula Savioja,et al.  Challenges of developing the complex socio-technical system: realising the present, acknowledging the past, and envisaging the future of vessel traffic services. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[28]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  The Whats, Whens, Whys and Hows of VTS Operator use of Sensor Information , 2010 .

[29]  Margareta Lützhöft,et al.  Learning from the past for pro-activity -A re-analysis of the accident of the MV Herald of Free Enterprise , 2011 .

[30]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[31]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  FRAM as a risk assessment method for nuclear fuel transportation , 2008 .

[32]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Resilience Markers for Safer Systems and Organisations , 2008, SAFECOMP.

[33]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  The human use of human beings - cybernetics and society , 1988 .

[34]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[35]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  Functional modeling for risk assessment of automation in a changing air traffic management environment , 2008 .

[36]  I. A. Herrera,et al.  Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[37]  Rogier Woltjer,et al.  Resilience assessment based on models of functional resonance , 2008 .

[38]  S.J. Chang,et al.  Development and analysis of AIS applications as an efficient tool for vessel traffic service , 2004, Oceans '04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean '04 (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37600).

[39]  Mark-Alexander Sujan,et al.  Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security , 2014, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.