Choices, limitations, hazards and value of technology in the treatment of lithiasis
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] J. Talati,et al. The scope and place of ultrasound-monitored extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in a multimodality setting and the effects of experiential, audit-evoked changes on the management of ureteric calculi. , 1994, British journal of urology.
[2] J. Talati,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary tract stones using MPL 9000 spark gap technology and ultrasound monitoring. , 1991, The Journal of urology.
[3] J. Rassweiler,et al. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteric calculi using modern techniques. , 1990, British journal of urology.
[4] M. E. Beall,et al. Initial EDAP LT-01 lithotripsy group experience in the United States. , 1989, The Journal of urology.
[5] Y. Moon,et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy: experience with piezoelectric second generation lithotriptor in 642 patients. , 1989, The Journal of urology.
[6] K. Shuttleworth,et al. Is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy suitable treatment for lower ureteric stones? , 1988, British journal of urology.
[7] W. dodds,et al. Renal calculi: sensitivity for detection with US. , 1988, Radiology.
[8] D. Jones,et al. Radiation dose to patient and personnel during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 1987, The Journal of urology.
[9] W. -. Chen,et al. Factors influencing radiation exposure during the extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.