Evaluating voluntary travel behaviour change: Suggested guidelines and case studies

Since the late 1990s, voluntary travel behaviour change (VTBC) has been an increasingly popular strategy in Australia, applied to reduce both reliance on the car and greenhouse gas emissions. Early efforts to evaluate the impact of this strategy were generally implemented by the agency that also implemented the policy and used small sample, self-report surveys. The paper starts out by discussing the nature and size of travel behaviour changes that are frequently expected in current policy, noting that these are often smaller than the sampling and measurement errors in traditional methods of measuring travel behaviour. The paper then discusses some alternative methods of evaluating voluntary travel behaviour change implementations using panels to reduce sampling error, and using a combination of personal Global Positioning System devices and odometer reading surveys to measure travel patterns. From these considerations, a number of guidelines are suggested for what is required to evaluate voluntary travel behaviour change. The paper describes three recent case studies in Australia in which such methods have been used and evaluates the methodological approaches used in these studies against the suggested guidelines.

[1]  Ryuichi Kitamura,et al.  Panels for transportation planning : methods and applications , 1997 .

[2]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Search for a global positioning system device to measure person travel , 2008 .

[3]  P. Stopher,et al.  Households on the move - Experiences of a new approach to voluntary travel behaviour change , 2006 .

[4]  Elizabeth Ampt,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR CHANGE METHODS: A SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGE , 2001 .

[5]  Michael A. P. Taylor,et al.  Travelling smarter down under: policies for voluntary travel behaviour change in Australia , 2003 .

[6]  Rita Seethaler,et al.  Using odometer readings to assess VKT changes associated with a voluntary travel behaviour change program , 2009 .

[7]  Jean-Loup Madre,et al.  Multi-Day and Multi-Period Data , 2003 .

[8]  Jean Wolf,et al.  TRIP RATE ANALYSIS IN GPS-ENHANCED PERSONAL TRAVEL SURVEYS. IN: TRANSPORT SURVEY QUALITY AND INNOVATION , 2003 .

[9]  Tomás Ruiz,et al.  STANDARDS AND PRACTICE FOR MULTI-DAY AND MULTI-PERIOD SURVEYS. IN: TRANSPORT SURVEY QUALITY AND INNOVATION , 2003 .

[10]  J. Wolf Applications of New Technologies in Travel Surveys , 2006 .

[11]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Developing and deploying a new wearable GPS device for transport applications , 2005 .

[12]  Peter Jones,et al.  Encouraging behaviour change through marketing and management: what can be achieved? , 2007 .

[13]  P. Stopher,et al.  Households on the Move: New Approach to Voluntary Travel Behavior Change , 2006 .

[14]  Stephen Greaves,et al.  Guidelines for samplers: measuring a change in behaviour from before and after surveys , 2007 .

[15]  P. Stopher,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of the Sydney Household Travel Survey with GPS , 2007 .

[16]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Travel survey methods : quality and future directions , 2006 .

[17]  Peter Jones,et al.  'Encouraging behavioural change through marketing and management: what can be achieved?' Resource paper at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Lucerne, 10-15 August , 2003 .

[18]  A. Richardson,et al.  Design issues for before and after surveys of travel behaviour change , 2003 .

[19]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Variability of Travel over Multiple Days , 2008 .

[20]  S. Fujii,et al.  Determinants of the effectiveness of travel feedback programs—a review of communicative mobility management measures for changing travel behaviour in Japan , 2006 .

[21]  Peter R. Stopher,et al.  Transport Survey Quality and Innovation , 2003 .