Are traits measured on pot grown plants representative of those in natural communities

Abstract Question: The quantification of functional traits in natural communities can be difficult (e.g. root traits, RGR). Can functional traits measured on pot grown plants be reliably applied to natural communities? Alternatively, can below-ground plant traits be predicted from above-ground traits? Location: Southeastern Australia. Methods: We compared 17 shoot, root and whole-plant morphological traits measured on 14 plant species in a native grassland community to those measured under two different pot conditions: unfertilised and fertilised. Results: The majority of trait values for pot grown plants differed to plants in the field, however, species ranking remained consistent for most leaf traits between the field and the two pot growing conditions. In contrast, species ranking was not consistent for most whole plant traits when comparing field plants to fertilised pot grown plants, providing a caution against the tendency to grow plants in controlled conditions at ‘optimal’ (high) resource levels. Moderate to strong correlations were found between below-ground and above-ground plant traits, including between root dry matter content and leaf dry matter content, and between specific root area and specific leaf area. Conclusions: The utility of pot grown plants to quantify traits for field plants is highly dependent on the selection of the growing conditions in the controlled environment. The consistency we observed between above-ground and below-ground trait strategies suggests that below-ground traits may be predictable based on above-ground traits, reducing the need to quantify root traits on cultured plants. Nomenclature: Harden (1996); Linder (1997).

[1]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Quantitative estimation of phenotypic plasticity: bridging the gap between the evolutionary concept and its ecological applications , 2006 .

[2]  Peter Ryser,et al.  The mysterious root length , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[3]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  S. Díaz,et al.  Suites of root traits differ between annual and perennial species growing in the field. , 2006, The New phytologist.

[5]  S. Plantureux,et al.  Variation in leaf traits through seasons and N-availability levels and its consequences for ranking grassland species , 2005 .

[6]  P. Reich,et al.  Assessing the generality of global leaf trait relationships. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[7]  Eric Garnier,et al.  PLANT FUNCTIONAL MARKERS CAPTURE ECOSYSTEM PROPERTIES DURING SECONDARY SUCCESSION , 2004 .

[8]  J. Bastow Wilson,et al.  Evidence for limiting similarity in a sand dune community , 2004 .

[9]  P. Roche,et al.  Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits: which traits are the more reliable? , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[10]  J. Craine,et al.  The dependence of root system properties on root system biomass of 10 North American grassland species , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[11]  Mark Westoby,et al.  A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme , 1998, Plant and Soil.

[12]  P. Ryser,et al.  Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast- and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply , 1995, Plant and Soil.

[13]  M. Mensink,et al.  Size and morphology of root systems of perennial grasses from contrasting habitats as affected by nitrogen supply , 1990, Plant and Soil.

[14]  M. Austin,et al.  Competition between Australian native and introduced grasses along a nutrient gradient , 2003 .

[15]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[16]  M. Maestro,et al.  Functional traits of woody plants: correspondence of species rankings between field adults and laboratory-grown seedlings? , 2003 .

[17]  P. Reich,et al.  The Evolution of Plant Functional Variation: Traits, Spectra, and Strategies , 2003, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[18]  J. Craine,et al.  Covariation in leaf and root traits for native and non-native grasses along an altitudinal gradient in New Zealand , 2003, Oecologia.

[19]  Bill Shipley,et al.  Interspecific consistency and intraspecific variability of specific leaf area with respect to irradiance and nutrient availability , 2003 .

[20]  P. Reich,et al.  Functional traits, productivity and effects on nitrogen cycling of 33 grassland species , 2002 .

[21]  John D. Storey.  A direct approach to false discovery rates , 2002 .

[22]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below‐ground/above‐ground allometries of plants in water‐limited ecosystems , 2002 .

[23]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[24]  Peter Ryser,et al.  Root tissue structure is linked to ecological strategies of grasses. , 2000, The New phytologist.

[25]  M. Westoby,et al.  Cross‐species relationships between seedling relative growth rate, nitrogen productivity and root vs leaf function in 28 Australian woody species , 2000 .

[26]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity , 1999 .

[27]  Peter H Linder.  Nomenclatural corrections in the Rytidosperma complex (Danthonieae, Poaceae) , 1997 .

[28]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  E. Garnier,et al.  Specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen concentration in annual and perennial grass species growing in Mediterranean old-fields , 1997, Oecologia.

[30]  A. Freijsen,et al.  On ecological inference from laboratory experiments conducted under optimum conditions , 1994 .

[31]  M. Abrams,et al.  Relating Wet and Dry Year Ecophysiology to Leaf Structure in Contrasting Temperate Tree Species , 1994 .

[32]  G. Harden.  Flora of New South Wales , 1992 .

[33]  D. F. Grigal,et al.  Vertical root distributions of northern tree species in relation to successional status , 1987 .

[34]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .