Use of partial stimulus information in response processing.

We examined the reaction time benefit that is obtained when salient features of the stimulus set and response set correspond. Components of the event-related brain potentials were used to measure the timing of stimulus-related and response-related processes in order to determine the locus of this effect. Of particular importance was the development of a new index of selective response preparation, the corrected motor asymmetry (CMA). We found no evidence for the use of preliminary, partial stimulus information in response preparation. These results suggest that the benefit is located primarily in response selection processes and probably reflects a more efficient algorithm for stimulus-response translation. Also, we found trial-to-trial variability in the duration of response selection to be the major determinant of variability in reaction time, whereas the durations of subsequent response-related processes were relatively invariant. Implications of these results for discrete and continuous models of choice reaction performance are discussed.

[1]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance , 2004 .

[4]  H N Zelaznik,et al.  Reaction time methods in the study of motor programming: the precuing of hand, digit, and duration. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[5]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Uncovering mental processes with factorial experiments , 1984 .

[6]  P. A. Williamson,et al.  Asymmetric neural control systems in human self-regulation. , 1984, Psychological review.

[7]  E. Donchin,et al.  On the dependence of P300 latency on stimulus evaluation processes. , 1984, Psychophysiology.

[8]  T. B. Ward.  Response tempo and separable--integral responding: evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Miller.  Discrete versus continuous stage models of human information processing: in search of partial output. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Robert Nullmeyer,et al.  Human reaction time: Toward a general theory , 1982 .

[11]  K. Brookhuis,et al.  Late positive components and stimulus evaluation time , 1981, Biological Psychology.

[12]  E Donchin,et al.  A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. , 1981, Science.

[13]  D. Rosenbaum.  Human movement initiation: specification of arm, direction, and extent. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  E. Donchin,et al.  Preparation to respond as manifested by movement-related brain potentials , 1980, Brain Research.

[15]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[16]  C W Eriksen,et al.  Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  James L. McClelland.  On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[18]  J. Desmedt.  Attention, Voluntary Contraction and Event-Related Cerebral Potentials , 1977 .

[19]  D A Taylor,et al.  Stage analysis of reaction time. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[21]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Differential effects of familiarity on judgments of sameness and difference , 1971 .

[22]  G Mulder,et al.  The continuous flow model revisited: perceptual and central motor aspects. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[23]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[24]  T. G. Reeve,et al.  Compatibility Effects in the Assignment of Symbolic Stimuli to Discrete Finger Responses , 1985 .

[25]  K. Brookhuis,et al.  Stage analysis of the reaction process using brain-evoked potentials and reaction time , 1984, Psychological research.

[26]  John W. Rohrbaugh,et al.  13 Sensory and Motor Aspects of the Contingent Negative Variation , 1983 .

[27]  Walter Ritter,et al.  Tutorials in event related potential research : endogenous components , 1983 .

[28]  A. Sanders.  20 Stage Analysis of Reaction Processes , 1980 .

[29]  E. Donchin.  Event-related Brain Potentials: A Tool in the Study of Human Information Processing , 1979 .

[30]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .