The regime diagram for premixed flame kernel-vortex interactions—Revisited

Regimes of flame kernel-vortex (KV) interactions are investigated numerically using a detailed mechanism for hydrogen chemistry. The parametric simulations explore a wide range of conditions that are representative of conditions encountered at various degrees of turbulence intensity. The results show that KV interactions can be classified into five different regimes, which include (1) the laminar kernel regime, (2) the wrinkled kernel regime, (3) the breakthrough regime, (4) the global extinction regime, and (5) the regeneration after global extinction (RGE) regime. With the exception of the last regime, the transition from one regime to another in the order listed corresponds to increasing the vortex size and strength. Operation at the RGE regime reveals interesting dynamics of the flame front that results in reignition or mending of combustion regimes after most of the original kernel has extinguished due to intense straining. Two different types of combustion zones are observed, which correspond to a flamelet structure as well as to more diffuse structures of merged flame segments. A revised regime diagram of the KV interactions is proposed that includes the broader range of KV interactions and incorporates the new RGE regime.

[1]  Thierry Poinsot,et al.  Quenching processes and premixed turbulent combustion diagrams , 1991, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  H. Baum,et al.  The Equations of Motion for Thermally Driven, Buoyant Flows. , 1978, Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards.

[3]  J. Driscoll,et al.  A laminar vortex interacting with a premixed flame: Measured formation of pockets of reactants , 1991 .

[4]  W. Roberts,et al.  Observations on the interaction between a premixed flame kernel and a vortex of different equivalence ratio , 2002 .

[5]  M S Day,et al.  Numerical simulation of laminar reacting flows with complex chemistry , 2000 .

[6]  J. C. Rolon,et al.  Wrinkling, pocket formation, and double premixed flame interaction processes , 1998 .

[7]  T. Echekki,et al.  Effects of preferential and differential diffusion on the mutual annihilation of two premixed hydrogen–air flames , 2005 .

[8]  T. Echekki,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF UNSTEADY DOWNSTREAM INTERACTIONS OF PREMIXED HYDROGEN-AIR FLAMES , 2007 .

[9]  Thierry Poinsot,et al.  Stretching and quenching of flamelets in premixed turbulent combustion , 1991 .

[10]  W. Roberts,et al.  Effect of unsteady stretch on spark-ignited flame kernel survival , 1999 .

[11]  Tarek Echekki,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of premixed flame kernel-vortex interactions in hydrogen-air mixtures , 2006 .

[12]  William L. Roberts,et al.  Investigation of Pre-mixed Flame-Kernel/Vortex Interactions via High-Speed Imaging , 2001 .

[13]  Reaction zone structure of non-premixed turbulent flames in the “intensely wrinkled” regime , 2000 .

[14]  L. Goss,et al.  Images of the quenching of a flame by a vortex-To quantify regimes of turbulent combustion , 1993 .

[15]  T. Echekki,et al.  A regime diagram for premixed flame kernel-vortex interactions , 2007 .

[16]  N. Peters.  The turbulent burning velocity for large-scale and small-scale turbulence , 1999, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.