An adaption of the level of traffic stress based on evidence from the literature and widely available data

Abstract Bicyclist quality of service measures are often difficult to apply on the network rather than facility level. Analyzing bicycle infrastructure on the network level is a critical process for managing bicycle infrastructure planning, design, and construction. The Level of Traffic Stress (LTS) measure fills this need for a network level measure. However, the originally proposed LTS measure leaves some gaps related to the designation of facilities and requires data that may be difficult to collect on a network level. The adapted LTS measure proposed here is based on traffic, roadway, and bikeway characteristics data available to most planning and engineering agencies and on evidence from the literature. The adapted LTS was used to classify and analyze bike network connectivity in two case studies to assess the methodology and demonstrate practical applications in infrastructure management. The first was a six-mile buffer zone of the Atlanta BeltLine Eastside Trail, and the second was a three-mile transit access zone around three transit stations in southwest Atlanta. The analysis was done in ArcGIS and provides results that can be easily interpreted by the public and decision makers, while relying on quantifiable traffic and roadway characteristics.

[1]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Where do cyclists ride? A route choice model developed with revealed preference GPS data , 2012 .

[2]  J. Pucher,et al.  Infrastructure, programs, and policies to increase bicycling: an international review. , 2010, Preventive medicine.

[3]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them , 2003 .

[4]  R. Bronson,et al.  Alternative and adaptive transportation: What household factors support recovery from a drastic increase in gas price? , 2014, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[5]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Assessment of Three Alternative Bicycle Infrastructure Quality-of-Service Metrics , 2013 .

[6]  Patricia Jasmin Krenn,et al.  Route choices of transport bicyclists: a comparison of actually used and shortest routes , 2014, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[7]  M. Brauer,et al.  Built Environment Influences on Healthy Transportation Choices: Bicycling versus Driving , 2010, Journal of urban health.

[8]  Karel Martens,et al.  The bicycle as a feedering mode: experiences from three European countries , 2004 .

[9]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Understanding and Measuring Bicycling Behavior: a Focus on Travel Time and Route Choice , 2008 .

[10]  Nathan McNeil,et al.  Four Types of Cyclists? , 2013 .

[11]  Peter G. Furth,et al.  Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity , 2012 .

[12]  Meghan Winters,et al.  Improving public health through active transportation : understanding the influence of the built environment on decisions to travel by bicycle , 2011 .

[13]  Michael Grant,et al.  How Far Out of the Way Will We Travel? , 2010 .

[14]  Catherine Morency,et al.  Estimating Latent Cycling Trips in Montreal, Canada , 2012 .

[15]  S. Handy,et al.  Using a stages of change approach to explore opportunities for increasing bicycle commuting , 2015 .

[16]  K. Teschke,et al.  Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride , 2011 .

[17]  Luis F. Miranda-Moreno,et al.  Weather or Not to Cycle , 2011 .

[18]  Michael Duncan,et al.  Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[19]  Geoffrey Rose,et al.  Commuter Cyclist Travel Behavior , 2013 .

[20]  J. Pucher,et al.  Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling , 1999 .

[21]  Michael Grimsrud,et al.  What’s your type: a multidimensional cyclist typology , 2014 .

[22]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Factors Affecting Bicycling Demand , 2007 .

[23]  M. Wardman,et al.  Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data , 2007 .

[24]  Donald W. Reinfurt,et al.  Development of the Bicycle Compatibility Index , 1996 .

[25]  Jennifer Dill,et al.  Revisiting the Four Types of Cyclists: Findings from a National Survey , 2016 .

[26]  Charlene DeAnne Mingus Bicyclist perceived level of traffic stress: a quality of service measure , 2015 .

[27]  J. Pucher,et al.  Cycling to work in 90 large American cities: new evidence on the role of bike paths and lanes , 2012 .

[28]  Rebecca L Sanders Dissecting Perceived Traffic Risk as a Barrier to Adult Bicycling , 2013 .