Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells.

The differentiation between live and dead bacterial cells presents an important challenge in many microbiological applications. Due to the persistence of DNA in the environment after cells have lost viability, DNA-based detection methods cannot differentiate whether positive signals originate from live or dead bacterial targets. We present here a novel chemical, propidium monoazide (PMA), that (like propidium iodide) is highly selective in penetrating only into 'dead' bacterial cells with compromised membrane integrity but not into live cells with intact cell membranes/cell walls. Upon intercalation in the DNA of dead cells, the photo-inducible azide group allows PMA to be covalently cross-linked by exposure to bright light. This process renders the DNA insoluble and results in its loss during subsequent genomic DNA extraction. Subjecting a bacterial population comprised of both live and dead cells to PMA treatment thus results in selective removal of DNA from dead cells. We provide evidence that this chemical can be applied to a wide range of species across the bacterial kingdom presenting a major advantage over ethidium monoazide (EMA). The general application of EMA is hampered by the fact that the chemical can also penetrate live cells of some bacterial species. Transport pumps actively export EMA out of metabolically active cells, but the remaining EMA level can lead to substantial loss of DNA. The higher charge of PMA might be the reason for the higher impermeability through intact cell membranes, thus avoiding DNA loss.

[1]  K L Josephson,et al.  Polymerase chain reaction detection of nonviable bacterial pathogens , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[2]  R. Levin,et al.  Discrimination of viable Vibrio vulnificus cells from dead cells in real-time PCR. , 2006, Journal of microbiological methods.

[3]  C. Hewitt,et al.  Analysis of bacterial function by multi-colour fluorescence flow cytometry and single cell sorting. , 2000, Journal of microbiological methods.

[4]  S. Drømtorp,et al.  Detection of viable and dead Listeria monocytogenes on gouda‐like cheeses by real‐time PCR , 2005, Letters in applied microbiology.

[5]  Stephens,et al.  Assessment of bacterial viability status by flow cytometry and single cell sorting , 1998, Journal of applied microbiology.

[6]  Knut Rudi,et al.  Use of Ethidium Monoazide and PCR in Combination for Quantification of Viable and Dead Cells in Complex Samples , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  Knut Rudi,et al.  Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5'-nuclease PCR. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[8]  R. Ronimus,et al.  Rapid differentiation and enumeration of the total, viable vegetative cell and spore content of thermophilic bacilli in milk powders with reference to Anoxybacillus flavithermus , 2005, Journal of applied microbiology.

[9]  V. Sharma,et al.  Detection of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7 by using a multiplex real-time PCR assay for genes encoding intimin and Shiga toxins. , 2003, Veterinary microbiology.

[10]  M. Waring,et al.  Complex formation between ethidium bromide and nucleic acids. , 1965, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  C. Morris,et al.  The Relationship of Host Range, Physiology, and Genotype to Virulence on Cantaloupe in Pseudomonas syringae from Cantaloupe Blight Epidemics in France. , 2000, Phytopathology.

[12]  J. S. Brand,et al.  Characterization of azidobenzamidines as photoaffinity labels for trypsin. , 1978, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[13]  H. Shapiro,et al.  Multiparameter flow cytometry of bacteria. , 2004, Methods in molecular biology.

[14]  H. Steen,et al.  Staining of Escherichia coli for flow cytometry: influx and efflux of ethidium bromide. , 1994, Cytometry.

[15]  Anne K. Camper,et al.  Selective Removal of DNA from Dead Cells of Mixed Bacterial Communities by Use of Ethidium Monoazide , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  D. Kell,et al.  Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues , 1998, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[17]  J. Gaubatz,et al.  Demonstration of specific high affinity binding sites in plasmid DNA by photoaffinity labeling with an ethidium analog. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  W. E. White,et al.  Selective covalent binding of an ethidium analog to mitochondrial DNA with production of petite mutants in yeast by photoaffinity labelling. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  B. Mackey,et al.  Effect of stress treatments on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by the polymerase chain reaction. , 1994, The Journal of applied bacteriology.