What is the Best Surface EMG Measure of Lumbar Flexion-Relaxation for Distinguishing Chronic Low Back Pain Patients From Pain-free Controls?

Objectives:Lumbar flexion-relaxation (FR) is a well-known phenomenon that can reliably be seen in normal subjects but not in most chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine which surface electromyographic (SEMG) measures of FR best distinguish CLBP patients from pain-free control subjects. Standing SEMG and lumbar flexion range of motion (ROM) were also evaluated. Methods:A cohort of 218 CLBP patients, who were admitted to a functional restoration program, received a standardized SEMG and ROM assessment during standing trunk flexion and reextension. An asymptomatic control group of 30 nonpatients received an identical assessment. Both groups were compared on 8 separate SEMG and 3 flexion ROM measures. Results:A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine how well each measure distinguished between the CLBP patients and the pain-free control subjects. All SEMG measures of FR performed acceptably. Between 79% and 82% of patients, and 83% and 100% of controls were correctly classified. Standing SEMG performed less well. Gross flexion ROM was the best single classification measure tested, correctly classifying 88% of patients and 83% of controls. A series of discriminant analyses found that certain combinations of SEMG and ROM performed slightly better than gross ROM alone for correctly classifying the 2 subjects groups. Discussion:Because all SEMG measures of FR performed acceptably, the determination of which SEMG measure of FR is “best” is largely dependent on one’s specific purpose. In addition, ROM measures were found to be important components of the FR assessment.

[1]  W. Floyd,et al.  The function of the erectores spinae muscles in certain movements and postures in man * , 1955, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  A. Parker,et al.  Posture Related to Myoelectric Silence of Erectores Spinae During Trunk Flexion , 1984, Spine.

[3]  A. Haig,et al.  Pain-Related Fear, Lumbar Flexion, and Dynamic EMG Among Persons With Chronic Musculoskeletal Low Back Pain , 2004, The Clinical journal of pain.

[4]  P. Onghena,et al.  Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance , 1995, Pain.

[5]  T. Mayer,et al.  Quantifying the Lumbar Flexion–Relaxation Phenomenon: Theory, Normative Data, and Clinical Applications , 2003, Spine.

[6]  R. Gatchel,et al.  Toward more accurate use of the Beck Depression Inventory with chronic back pain patients. , 1999, The Clinical journal of pain.

[7]  J M Morris,et al.  An electromyographic study of the intrinsic muscles of the back in man. , 1962, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  T. Mayer,et al.  Physical progress and residual impairment quantification after functional restoration. Part I: Lumbar mobility. , 1994, Spine.

[9]  J. S. R. Golding.  Electromyography of the Erector Spinae in Low Back Pain , 1952 .

[10]  K Tanii,et al.  A kinesiologic study of erectores spinae activity during trunk flexion and extension. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[11]  Donald D. McGeary,et al.  High pain ratings predict treatment failure in chronic occupational musculoskeletal disorders. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[13]  Editedby Eleanor Criswell,et al.  Cram's Introduction to Surface Electromyography , 2010 .

[14]  L. Haugh,et al.  Prospective evidence for change in paraspinal muscle activity after herniated nucleus pulposus. , 1993, Spine.

[15]  A. Haig,et al.  A meta-analytic review of surface electromyography among persons with low back pain and normal, healthy controls. , 2005, The journal of pain : official journal of the American Pain Society.

[16]  P A Mathieu,et al.  EMG and kinematics of normal subjects performing trunk flexion/extensions freely in space. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[17]  P. Watson,et al.  Evidence for the Role of Psychological Factors in Abnormal Paraspinal Activity in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain , 1997 .

[18]  F. Morin,et al.  Electromyographic study of postural muscles in various positions and movements. , 1956, The American journal of physiology.

[19]  T. Mayer,et al.  The Quantified Lumbar Flexion-Relaxation Phenomenon Is a Useful Measurement of Improvement in a Functional Restoration Program , 2009, Spine.

[20]  A Nouwen,et al.  Patterns of Muscular Activity during Movement in Patients with Chronic Low-back Pain , 1987, Spine.

[21]  T. Mayer,et al.  Use of noninvasive techniques for quantification of spinal range-of-motion in normal subjects and chronic low-back dysfunction patients. , 1984, Spine.

[22]  B. Murphy,et al.  Changes in the Flexion Relaxation Response Following an Exercise Intervention , 2006, Spine.

[23]  J. Partanen,et al.  Electric behavior of low back muscles during lumbar pelvic rhythm in low back pain patients and healthy controls. , 1991, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[24]  B. Murphy,et al.  Muscle activation changes after exercise rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. , 2008, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  T. Ito,et al.  Flexion-relaxation phenomenon in the back muscles. A comparative study between healthy subjects and patients with chronic low back pain. , 1995, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[26]  David K. Ahern,et al.  Comparison of lumbar paravertebral EMG patterns in chronic low back pain patients and non-patient controls , 1988, Pain.

[27]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Quantification of Lumbar Function: Part 5: Reliability of Range-of-Motion Measures in the Sagittal Plane and an In Vivo Torso Rotation Measurement Technique , 1986, Spine.

[28]  C. Richards,et al.  Hip-spine movement interaction and muscle activation patterns during sagittal trunk movements in low back pain patients. , 1994, Spine.

[29]  O. Airaksinen,et al.  Functional changes in back muscle activity correlate with pain intensity and prediction of low back pain during pregnancy. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  J V Basmajian,et al.  Electromyography of deep back muscles in man. , 1972, The American journal of anatomy.

[31]  A. Schultz,et al.  Correlation of Objective Measure of Trunk Motion and Muscle Function with Low-back Disability Ratings , 1987, Spine.

[32]  S M McGill,et al.  The importance of normalization in the interpretation of surface electromyography: a proof of principle. , 1999, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics.

[33]  T. Mayer,et al.  Correcting Abnormal Flexion-relaxation in Chronic Lumbar Pain: Responsiveness to a New Biofeedback Training Protocol , 2010, The Clinical journal of pain.

[34]  P J Watson,et al.  Surface electromyography in the identification of chronic low back pain patients: the development of the flexion relaxation ratio. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  E. Talbott,et al.  Chronic low back pain assessment using surface electromyography. , 2000, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[36]  T. Mayer,et al.  The Million Visual Analog Scale: Its Utility For Predicting Tertiary Rehabilitation Outcomes , 2003, Spine.

[37]  M. Geisser,et al.  Flexion-relaxation and Clinical Features Associated With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Comparison of Different Methods of Quantifying Flexion-relaxation , 2009, The Clinical journal of pain.