Statistical Class Separation Using sEMG Features Towards Automated Muscle Fatigue Detection and Prediction

Surface Electromyography (sEMG) activity of the biceps muscle was recorded from ten subjects. Data were recorded while subjects performed isometric contraction until fatigue. The signals were segmented into three parts (Non-Fatigue, Transition-to-Fatigue and Fatigue), assisted by a fuzzy classifier using arm angle and arm oscillation as inputs. Nine features were extracted from each of the three classes to quantify the potential performance of each feature, also aiding towards the differentiation of the three classes of muscle fatigue within the sEMG signal. Percent change was calculated between Non-Fatigue and Transition-to-Fatigue and also between Transition-to-Fatigue and Fatigue classes. Estimation of relative class overlap using Partition Index approach was used to show features that can best distinguish between the three classes and quantifying class separability. Results show that the selected dominant frequency best discriminate between the classes, giving the highest average percent change of 159.37% and 64.75%. Partition Index showed small values confirming the percent change calculations. ©2009 IEEE.

[1]  Dinesh Kant Kumar,et al.  Wavelet analysis of surface electromyography , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  M. R. Al-Mulla,et al.  Classification of localized muscle fatigue with genetic programming on sEMG during isometric contraction , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  M. Knaflitz,et al.  EMG assessment of back muscle function during cyclical lifting. , 1998, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[4]  Jun Yu,et al.  Time-frequency analysis of myoelectric signals during dynamic contractions: a comparative study , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  M Hagberg,et al.  Work load and fatigue in repetitive arm elevations. , 1981, Ergonomics.

[6]  A. R. Lind,et al.  Evaluation of amplitude and frequency components of the surface EMG as an index of muscle fatigue. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[7]  M. Colley,et al.  Title : “ MYOELECTRIC SIGNAL ANALYSIS ON LOCALISED MUSCLE TO DETECT MUSCLE FATIGUE DURING SUSTAINED ISOMETRIC CONTRACTION , 2009 .

[8]  M. Bryce.  Muscles Alive: Their Functions Revealed by Electromyography , 1963 .

[9]  Mohamad Khalil,et al.  Classification of the Car Seats by Detecting the Muscular Fatigue in the EMG Signal , 2005 .

[10]  K Kanosue,et al.  The number of active motor units and their firing rates in voluntary contraction of human brachialis muscle. , 1979, The Japanese journal of physiology.

[11]  G. Hefftner,et al.  The electromyogram (EMG) as a control signal for functional neuromuscular stimulation. I. Autoregressive modeling as a means of EMG signature discrimination , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  Victor J. Rayward-Smith,et al.  Adapting k-means for supervised clustering , 2006, Applied Intelligence.

[13]  F. Mohd-Yasin,et al.  Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications , 2006, Biological Procedures Online.

[14]  James C. Bezdek,et al.  Validity-guided (re)clustering with applications to image segmentation , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Mario Cifrek,et al.  Surface EMG based muscle fatigue evaluation in biomechanics. , 2009, Clinical biomechanics.

[16]  J. Basmajian.  Muscles Alive—their functions revealed by electromyography , 1963 .