Bayesian Inference Explains Perception of Unity and Ventriloquism Aftereffect: Identification of Common Sources of Audiovisual Stimuli

We study a computational model of audiovisual integration by setting a Bayesian observer that localizes visual and auditory stimuli without presuming the binding of audiovisual information. The observer adopts the maximum a posteriori approach to estimate the physically delivered position or timing of presented stimuli, simultaneously judging whether they are from the same source or not. Several experimental results on the perception of spatial unity and the ventriloquism effect can be explained comprehensively if the subjects in the experiments are regarded as Bayesian observers who try to accurately locate the stimulus. Moreover, by adaptively changing the inner representation of the Bayesian observer in terms of experience, we show that our model reproduces perceived spatial frame shifts due to the audiovisual adaptation known as the ventriloquism aftereffect.

[1]  D. C. Higgins Human Spatial Orientation , 1967, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[2]  L. K. Canon Intermodality inconsistency of input and directed attention as determinants of the nature of adaptation. , 1970, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The After-Effects of Ventriloquism , 1974, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  W. Epstein Recalibration by Pairing: A Process of Perceptual Learning , 1975, Perception.

[5]  D. H. Warren,et al.  Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. , 1980, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Cross-modal bias and perceptual fusion with auditory-visual spatial discordance , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R. Lynn,et al.  A secular decline in the strength of Spearman’s g in Japan , 1994 .

[8]  M. Radeau Auditory-visual spatial interaction and modularity , 1994, Current psychology of cognition = Cahiers de psychologie cognitive : CPC.

[9]  Michael J. Berry,et al.  Adaptation of retinal processing to image contrast and spatial scale , 1997, Nature.

[10]  G. Recanzone Rapidly induced auditory plasticity: the ventriloquism aftereffect. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[12]  G. Recanzone,et al.  Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect , 2001, Neuroreport.

[13]  A. Pouget,et al.  Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[15]  J. Lewald Rapid adaptation to auditory-visual spatial disparity. , 2002, Learning & memory.

[16]  Robert A Jacobs,et al.  Bayesian integration of visual and auditory signals for spatial localization. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[17]  J. Lewald,et al.  Cross-modal perceptual integration of spatially and temporally disparate auditory and visual stimuli. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  P. Bertelson,et al.  Multisensory integration, perception and ecological validity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  M. Wallace,et al.  Visual Localization Ability Influences Cross-Modal Bias , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension. 1. Evidence from auditory-visual temporal order judgment. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  D. Burr,et al.  The Ventriloquist Effect Results from Near-Optimal Bimodal Integration , 2004, Current Biology.

[23]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  S. Nishida,et al.  Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[25]  M. Wallace,et al.  Unifying multisensory signals across time and space , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Rajesh P. N. Rao Bayesian Computation in Recurrent Neural Circuits , 2004, Neural Computation.

[27]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  Bayesian multisensory integration and cross-modal spatial links , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[28]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[29]  Ilana B. Witten,et al.  Why Seeing Is Believing: Merging Auditory and Visual Worlds , 2005, Neuron.

[30]  C. Spence,et al.  Audio-visual simultaneity judgments , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  Kenneth D. Miller,et al.  Adaptive filtering enhances information transmission in visual cortex , 2006, Nature.

[32]  Wei Ji Ma,et al.  Linking neurons to behavior in multisensory perception: A computational review , 2008, Brain Research.