Combining Attributes for Systems of Systems in Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration

One of the principal value propositions for the creation of Systems of Systems (SoS) is the ability to generate stakeholder value beyond that which can be delivered by a single system or even a collection of systems. The dynamic interactions among the component systems in a SoS make conceptual design decisions for SoS more complex compared to traditional system design. There are several heuristics and qualitative guidelines for designing SoS in the literature, but there is a lack of practical quantitative methods for SoS concept exploration. Development of quantitative methods for SoS conceptual design will greatly improve the ability of decision makers to select SoS designs in the concept design phase that will be value robust over time, by allowing them to consider a larger and more complete set of possible alternative SoS designs than is possible with qualitative methods alone. Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration has been used in the past to compare large numbers of system alternatives on a common cost-utility basis. In this method, the designer elicits the decision maker’s needs and formulates these as quantified attributes. The systems are then analyzed in terms of their ability to achieve the desired levels of attribute metrics. SoS-level attribute calculations must reflect component system interactions and emergent SoS-level value, as well as the added costs and benefits in the SoS as compared to that of the component systems operating alone. This paper introduces techniques for the SoS attribute combination modeling within the Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration method when considering SoS with heterogeneous component systems. Combining the attributes for the SoS-level must take into account the nature of the attributes provided by the component systems as well as the concept of operations for SoS. The techniques used for SoS attribute combination are classified according to the level of coordination between the component systems in the SoS. Using the information about the complexity of the method required along with knowledge about the control structure in the SoS, the SoS architect can estimate the added SoS integration costs. The ability to combine attributes contributes an essential constituent for the extension of the tradespace exploration methodology from the single system to the SoS level, allowing for the comparison of many SoS alternatives on a common cost-utility basis.

[1]  James Llinas,et al.  Revisiting the JDL Data Fusion Model II , 2004 .

[2]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Metrics for Evaluating Survivability in Dynamic Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration , 2008 .

[3]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Using Pareto Trace to determine system passive value robustness , 2009, 2009 3rd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[4]  Mark W. Maier,et al.  Architecting Principles for Systems‐of‐Systems , 1996 .

[5]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  Demonstration of System of Systems Multi-Attribute Tradespace Exploration on a Multi-Concept Surveillance Architecture , 2009 .

[6]  D.H. Rhodes,et al.  Using Attribute Classes to Uncover Latent Value during Conceptual Systems Design , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[7]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Managing unarticulated value : changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2006 .

[8]  D.H. Rhodes,et al.  The System Shell As A Construct for Mitigating the Impact of Changing Contexts by Creating Opportunities for Value Robustness , 2007, 2007 1st Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[9]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  A Framework for Tradespace Exploration of Systems of Systems , 2008 .

[10]  Daniel DeLaurentis,et al.  Understanding Transportation as a System-of-Systems Design Problem , 2005 .

[11]  Alan N. Steinberg,et al.  Rethinking the JDL Data Fusion Levels , 2005 .

[12]  James Llinas,et al.  An introduction to multisensor data fusion , 1997, Proc. IEEE.

[13]  Herbert Bassler,et al.  Systems Design for , 2007 .

[14]  J.S. Dahmann,et al.  Understanding the Current State of US Defense Systems of Systems and the Implications for Systems Engineering , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[15]  G. Rabadi,et al.  System of systems engineering , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[16]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[17]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Multi-attribute tradespace exploration with concurrent design as a value-centric framework for space system architecture and design , 2003 .