Curb Your Embodiment

To explain how abstract concepts are grounded in sensory-motor experiences, several theories have been proposed. I will discuss two of these proposals, Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Situated Cognition, and argue why they do not fully explain grounding. A central idea in Conceptual Metaphor Theory is that image schemas ground abstract concepts in concrete experiences. Image schemas might themselves be abstractions, however, and therefore do not solve the grounding problem. Moreover, image schemas are too simple to explain the full richness of abstract concepts. Situated cognition might provide such richness. Research in our laboratory, however, has shown that even for concrete concepts, sensory-motor grounding is task dependent. Therefore, it is questionable whether abstract concepts can be significantly grounded in sensory-motor processing.

[1]  K. Wiemer-hastings,et al.  Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concepts , 2005 .

[2]  Stephen D. Goldinger,et al.  The poverty of embodied cognition , 2016, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[3]  Guy Dove.  Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  A Functional Role for Motor Simulation in Identifying Tools , 2010, Psychological science.

[5]  J. Zlatev.  What's in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language , 2005 .

[6]  A. Glenberg,et al.  What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action , 1997, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  William D. Wattenmaker,et al.  Context and the recallability of concrete and abstract sentences. , 1987 .

[8]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[10]  Nikolaus Weiskopf,et al.  Motor affordance and its role for visual working memory: evidence from fMRI studies. , 2004, Experimental psychology.

[11]  Christine D. Wilson,et al.  Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Why the Sunny Side Is Up , 2004, Psychological science.

[13]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The challenge of abstract concepts. , 2017, Psychological bulletin.

[14]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Chapter 28 – SITUATED CONCEPTUALIZATION , 2005 .

[15]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought , 2002, Psychological science.

[16]  Lawrence W Barsalou,et al.  Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  Simon-Like and Functional Affordance Effects with Tools: The Effects of Object Perceptual Discrimination and Object Action State , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Mighty metaphors: Behavioral and ERP evidence that power shifts attention on a vertical dimension , 2012, Brain and Cognition.

[19]  Patricia A McMullen,et al.  Testing the embodied account of object naming: a concurrent motor task affects naming artifacts and animals. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[20]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual Processing Affects Conceptual Processing , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Diane Pecher,et al.  No role for motor affordances in visual working memory. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  B. Ross,et al.  Reminding-based category learning , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  L. Brooks,et al.  Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  D. Bub,et al.  Grasping beer mugs: on the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECT OF IMPLIED ORIENTATION DERIVED FROM VERBAL CONTEXT ON PICTURE RECOGNITION , 2022 .

[26]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content , 2008, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[27]  K. Fiedler,et al.  The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons: Social cognition and language. , 1988 .

[28]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Are Automatic Conceptual Cores the Gold Standard of Semantic Processing? The Context-Dependence of Spatial Meaning in Grounded Congruency Effects , 2015, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[31]  Stevan Harnad.  The Symbol Grounding Problem , 1999, ArXiv.

[32]  K. Yarrow,et al.  Viewing objects and planning actions: On the potentiation of grasping behaviours by visual objects , 2011, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  E. Shoben,et al.  Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials , 1983 .

[34]  D. Pecher,et al.  The role of affordances for working memory for objects , 2013 .

[35]  Inge Boot.  Representation of Categories Metaphorical Use of the Container Schema , 2011 .

[36]  R. Proctor,et al.  Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  How abstract is symbolic thought? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  The representation of abstract words: why emotion matters. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Transfer of Scientific Principles Using Concrete and Idealized Simulations , 2005, Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[40]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[41]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Putting words in perspective , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[42]  Ken McFarland,et al.  No specific role for the manual motor system in processing the meanings of words related to the hand , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  Katherine Guérard,et al.  When motor congruency modulates immediate memory for objects. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[44]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Representing Properties Locally , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Anna M. Borghi,et al.  Words as tools and the problem of abstract words meanings , 2009 .

[46]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Whither structured representation? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  Xu Xu,et al.  Content Differences for Abstract and Concrete Concept , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[48]  Alfred B. Yu,et al.  Limits on action priming by pictures of objects. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  B. Ross.  Distinguishing Types of Superficial Similarities: Different Effects on the Access and Use of Earlier Problems , 1989 .

[50]  Guy Dove.  Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism , 2009, Cognition.

[51]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Similarity is closeness: Metaphorical mapping in a conceptual task , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[52]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  Does the Concept of Affordance Add Anything to Explanations of Stimulus–Response Compatibility Effects? , 2014 .

[53]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Effects of motor congruence on visual working memory , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[54]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Object similarity bootstraps young children to action-based verb extension. , 2011, Child development.

[55]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[56]  B. Bahrami,et al.  Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics , 2012, Cortex.

[57]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Situating Abstract Concepts , 2004 .

[59]  R. Proctor,et al.  The object-based Simon effect: grasping affordance or relative location of the graspable part? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  M M Smyth,et al.  Working Memory for Movements , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[61]  G. Murphy.  On metaphoric representation , 1996, Cognition.

[62]  Bodo Winter,et al.  Of magnitudes and metaphors: Explaining cognitive interactions between space, time, and number , 2015, Cortex.

[63]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  MAC/FAC: A Model of Similarity-Based Retrieval , 1995, Cogn. Sci..

[64]  Todd R. Ferretti,et al.  Thematic Roles as Verb-specific Concepts , 1997 .

[65]  Michael Andres,et al.  Dissociation between manipulation and conceptual knowledge of object use in the supramarginalis gyrus , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[66]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[67]  A. Cangelosi,et al.  Electrophysiological Examination of Embodiment in Vision and Action , 2012, Psychological science.

[68]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Alignment effects in beer mugs: Automatic action activation or response competition? , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Rutvik H. Desai,et al.  The neurobiology of semantic memory , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Robert L. Goldstone.  The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[71]  Diane Pecher,et al.  The Role of Motor Action in Memory for Objects and Words , 2016 .

[72]  D. Bub,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General Dynamic Evocation of Hand Action Representations During Sentence Comprehension , 2012 .

[73]  R. Klatzky.  The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments , 1989 .

[74]  Nicolas Vermeulen,et al.  Sensory load incurs conceptual processing costs , 2008, Cognition.

[75]  B. Ross,et al.  Generalizing from the use of earlier examples in problem solving , 1990 .

[76]  Srini Narayanan,et al.  Spatial and Linguistic Aspects of Visual Imagery in Sentence Comprehension , 2007, Cogn. Sci..

[77]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  The burden of embodied cognition. , 2015, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[78]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[79]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  On the relationship between affordance and Simon effects: Are the effects really independent? , 2011 .

[80]  D. Gentner.  Verb semantic structures in memory for sentences: Evidence for componential representation , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[81]  Diane Pecher,et al.  Abstract concepts: sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond , 2011 .

[82]  R. Ward,et al.  S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation , 2002 .

[83]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[84]  Katherine Guérard,et al.  The role of motor affordances in immediate and long-term retention of objects. , 2015, Acta psychologica.

[85]  B. Ross.  This is like that: The use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. , 1987 .

[86]  K. McRae,et al.  Integrating Verbs, Situation Schemas, and Thematic Role Concepts , 2001 .

[87]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.

[88]  P. Mcmullen,et al.  Accessing embodied object representations from vision: A review. , 2015, Psychological bulletin.

[89]  G. Murphy,et al.  Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[90]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Inferences about action engage action systems , 2008, Brain and Language.

[91]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension , 2004 .