Effect of learning on line-of-balance scheduling

Abstract An approach to formulate learning rates and include them in line-of-balance (LOB) calculations is proposed in this paper. Learning rates are generated by modifying historical learning rates of typical construction activities and by incorporating the impact of relevant factors such as, number of operations in one unit, activity complexity, and job and management conditions. Fuzzy set theory is used to develop production rules to treat both factual and uncertain information. An S-type membership function is used to interpret the fuzzy data and produce adjustment factors that are in turn used to modify consecutive learning rates, until an adjusted learning rate is obtained. The adjusted learning rate is then used to calculate expected worker-hours and activity durations at each unit of production (e.g., a floor in a high-rise building, a mile of pavement work, etc.). A final LOB diagram is generated using this information. Different pairs of curves represent the start and the finish times of each activity in sets of units that make use of different numbers of crews. Learning reduces project duration and resource requirements. The proposed approach demonstrates the potential for formalizing the inclusion of learning effects into the LOB scheduling of repetitive-unit construction.

[1]  J. Goldberg Collective bargaining and productivity , 1975 .

[2]  David Arditi,et al.  Line‐of‐Balance Scheduling in Pavement Construction , 1986 .

[3]  Oldrich Stradal,et al.  Time Space Scheduling Method , 1982 .

[4]  David B. Ashley Simulation of Repetitive-Unit Construction , 1980 .

[5]  William F. Maloney Productivity Improvement: The Influence of Labor , 1983 .

[6]  Al Sarraj,et al.  Formal Development of Line‐of‐Balance Technique , 1990 .

[7]  Simaan M. AbouRizk,et al.  MODELING AND SIMULATING LEARNING DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION , 1992 .

[8]  C J Khisty THE APPLICATION OF THE "LINE OF BALANCE" TECHNIQUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 1970 .

[9]  Daniel W. Halpin,et al.  ANALYZING LINEAR CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS USING SIMULATION AND LINE OF BALANCE , 1992 .

[10]  Rehab Reda,et al.  RPM: Repetitive Project Modeling , 1990 .

[11]  James J. O'Brien VPM Scheduling for High-Rise Buildings , 1975 .

[12]  Amir Tavakoli,et al.  CPM Use in ENR Top 400 Contractors , 1990 .

[13]  Louis E. Yelle THE LEARNING CURVE: HISTORICAL REVIEW AND COMPREHENSIVE SURVEY , 1979 .

[14]  David W. Johnston LINEAR SCHEDULING METHOD FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION , 1981 .

[15]  H. Randolph Thomas,et al.  LEARNING CURVE MODELS OF CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTIVITY , 1986 .

[16]  F. Lévy Adaptation in the Production Process , 1965 .

[17]  Alan D. Russell,et al.  Extensions to Linear Scheduling Optimization , 1988 .

[18]  James E. Rowings,et al.  USE OF LINEAR SCHEDULING IN TRANSPORTATION PROJECTS , 1992 .

[19]  John G. Everett,et al.  Learning Curve Predictors for Construction Field Operations , 1994 .

[20]  Miroslaw J. Skibniewski,et al.  Modelling of building production activities for multifacility projects , 1989 .

[21]  J. R. De Jong,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF INCREASING SKILL ON CYCLE TIME AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR TIME STANDARDS , 1957 .

[22]  Marvin Gates,et al.  Learning and Experience Curves , 1972 .

[23]  James R. Wilson,et al.  Simulation of Learning Development in Repetitive Construction , 1994 .

[24]  T. P. Wright,et al.  Factors affecting the cost of airplanes , 1936 .