An investigation of the spectral properties of primary reflection coefficients

This paper investigates the form of the nonwhiteness found in the reflection coefficients from a wide variety of rock sequences around the world. In all but one case densities are taken as constant due to the paucity of suitable density data. The reflection sequences are pseudo-white only above a corner frequency, below which their power spectrum falls away according to a power law fβ, where β is between 0.5 and 1.5. This spectrum can be adequately modelled in practice very simply with an ARMA (1, 1) process which acts on a white innovation sequence. The corollary of this is that before wavelet estimation methods are applied (all of which-except those based on synthetic seismograms—presuppose white reflection sequences) or deconvolution filters estimated, seismic traces should be filtered with the inverse of this process. Interestingly, the estimated ARMA processes group themselves into two clearly differentiated categories, having very different indices of predictability (or, strictly, indices of linear determinism). The two categories apparently correlate precisely with two kinds of sedimentation: one which consists largely of sequences of rocks with repeating properties, called “repetitive” in this paper but perhaps loosely describable as “cyclic”, and the other which is randomly bedded with no apparent pattern of components. The former has indices of predictability which are two to four times as great as those of the latter. Another, probably related, property is that β for the repetitive sequences tends to be greater than that for non-repetitive rock columns. The observed power spectra are shown to be consistent with a simple model for the logarithm of acoustic impedance consisting of a mixture of processes where the distribution of (time) scale parameters is reciprocal. Detailed effects of block-averaging and sampling the logs are shown to depend on the type of sequence under examination.

[1]  G. H. F. Gardner,et al.  FORMATION VELOCITY AND DENSITY—THE DIAGNOSTIC BASICS FOR STRATIGRAPHIC TRAPS , 1974 .

[2]  W. Feller On the Kolmogorov–Smirnov Limit Theorems for Empirical Distributions , 1948 .

[3]  E. Montroll,et al.  Maximum entropy formalism, fractals, scaling phenomena, and 1/f noise: A tale of tails , 1983 .

[4]  James Durbin,et al.  The fitting of time series models , 1960 .

[5]  N. A. Anstey,et al.  Reflections on AMPLITUDES , 1971 .

[6]  A. M. Walker Some consequences of superimposed error in time series analysis , 1960 .

[7]  M. Rosenblatt Linear processes and bispectra , 1980 .

[8]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Modeling seismic impedance with Markov chains , 1980 .

[9]  F. K. Levin,et al.  The effect of subsurface sampling on one-dimensional synthetic seismograms , 1979 .

[10]  D. Thomson,et al.  Robust-resistant spectrum estimation , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  C. J. Velzeboer The theoretical seismic reflection response of sedimentary sequences , 1981 .

[12]  M. Schoenberger,et al.  Apparent attenuation due to intrabed multiples; II , 1974 .

[13]  E. Montroll,et al.  On 1/f noise and other distributions with long tails. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Marvin Stuart Keshner,et al.  Renewal process and diffusion models of 1/f noise , 1979 .

[15]  Clive W. J. Granger,et al.  Time Series Modelling and Interpretation , 1976 .

[16]  M. S. Keshner 1/f noise , 1982, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[17]  Francesco Battaglia,et al.  INVERSE AUTOCOVARIANCES AND A MEASURE OF LINEAR DETERMINISM FOR A STATIONARY PROCESS , 1983 .