Version 2 Ozone Monitoring Instrument SO2 product (OMSO2 V2): new anthropogenic SO2 vertical column density dataset

Abstract. The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) has been providing global observations of SO2 pollution since 2004. Here we introduce the new anthropogenic SO2 vertical column density (VCD) dataset in the version 2 OMI SO2 product (OMSO2 V2). As with the previous version (OMSO2 V1.3), the new dataset is generated with an algorithm based on principal component analysis of OMI radiances but features several updates. The most important among those is the use of expanded lookup tables and model a priori profiles to estimate SO2 Jacobians for individual OMI pixels, in order to better characterize pixel-to-pixel variations in SO2 sensitivity including over snow and ice. Additionally, new data screening and spectral fitting schemes have been implemented to improve the quality of the spectral fit. As compared with the planetary boundary layer SO2 dataset in OMSO2 V1.3, the new dataset has substantially better data quality, especially over areas that are relatively clean or affected by the South Atlantic Anomaly. The updated retrievals over snow/ice yield more realistic seasonal changes in SO2 at high latitudes and offer enhanced sensitivity to sources during wintertime. An error analysis has been conducted to assess uncertainties in SO2 VCDs from both the spectral fit and Jacobian calculations. The uncertainties from spectral fitting are reflected in SO2 slant column densities (SCDs) and largely depend on the signal-to-noise ratio of the measured radiances, as implied by the generally smaller SCD uncertainties over clouds or for smaller solar zenith angles. The SCD uncertainties for individual pixels are estimated to be ∼ 0.15–0.3 DU (Dobson units) between ∼ 40∘ S and ∼ 40∘ N and to be ∼ 0.2–0.5 DU at higher latitudes. The uncertainties from the Jacobians are approximately ∼ 50 %–100 % over polluted areas and are primarily attributed to errors in SO2 a priori profiles and cloud pressures, as well as the lack of explicit treatment for aerosols. Finally, the daily mean and median SCDs over the presumably SO2-free equatorial east Pacific have increased by only ∼ 0.0035 DU and ∼ 0.003 DU respectively over the entire 15-year OMI record, while the standard deviation of SCDs has grown by only ∼ 0.02 DU or ∼ 10%. Such remarkable long-term stability makes the new dataset particularly suitable for detecting regional changes in SO2 pollution.

[1]  Dongmei Chen,et al.  Declining precipitation acidity from H2SO4 and HNO3 across China inferred by OMI products , 2020 .

[2]  N. Krotkov,et al.  Ceramic industry at Morbi as a large source of SO2 emissions in India , 2020 .

[3]  N. Krotkov,et al.  A geometry-dependent surface Lambertian-equivalent reflectivity product for UV–Vis retrievals – Part 1: Evaluation over land surfaces using measurements from OMI at 466 nm , 2019, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[4]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  N. Krotkov,et al.  Linking improvements in sulfur dioxide emissions to decreasing sulfate wet deposition by combining satellite and surface observations with trajectory analysis , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.

[6]  Ritesh Gautam,et al.  Satellite‐Observed Changes in Mexico's Offshore Gas Flaring Activity Linked to Oil/Gas Regulations , 2019, Geophysical Research Letters.

[7]  G. Faluvegi,et al.  Global and regional trends of atmospheric sulfur , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[8]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  Gridded emissions of air pollutants for the period 1970–2012 within EDGAR v4.3.2 , 2018, Earth System Science Data.

[9]  K. F. Boersma,et al.  Improved slant column density retrieval of nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV: intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[10]  G. Janssens‑Maenhout,et al.  A new global anthropogenic SO2 emission inventory for the last decade: a mosaic of satellite-derived and bottom-up emissions , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[11]  P. Forster,et al.  Climate Impacts From a Removal of Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions , 2018, Geophysical research letters.

[12]  S. Carn,et al.  India Is Overtaking China as the World’s Largest Emitter of Anthropogenic Sulfur Dioxide , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[13]  L. G. Tilstra,et al.  The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space , 2017 .

[14]  Glen Jaross,et al.  In-flight performance of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument. , 2017, Atmospheric measurement techniques.

[15]  S. Carn,et al.  A decade of global volcanic SO2 emissions measured from space , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[16]  P. Kris-Etherton,et al.  Estimates of the direct and indirect cost savings associated with heart disease that could be avoided through dietary change in the United States , 2017, Journal of medical economics.

[17]  Isabelle De Smedt,et al.  Sulfur dioxide retrievals from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor : algorithm theoretical basis , 2017 .

[18]  Thomas F. Eck,et al.  Impacts of brown carbon from biomass burning on surface UV and ozone photochemistry in the Amazon Basin , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[19]  Can Li,et al.  Continuation of long-term global SO 2 pollution monitoring from OMI to OMPS , 2016 .

[20]  Isabelle De Smedt,et al.  Sulfur dioxide retrievals from TROPOMI onboard Sentinel-5 Precursor: algorithm theoretical basis , 2016 .

[21]  S. Carn,et al.  A global catalogue of large SO 2 sources and emissions derived from theOzone Monitoring Instrument , 2016 .

[22]  Can Li,et al.  New-generation NASA Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) volcanic SO 2 dataset: algorithm description, initial results, and continuation with the Suomi-NPP Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) , 2016 .

[23]  R. Martin,et al.  Space-based detection of missing sulfur dioxide sources of global air pollution , 2016 .

[24]  Wenhan Qin,et al.  Accounting for the effects of surface BRDF on satellite cloud and trace-gas retrievals: a new approach based on geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent reflectivity applied to OMI algorithms , 2016 .

[25]  Can Li,et al.  Response of SO2 and particulate air pollution to local and regional emission controls: A case study in Maryland , 2016 .

[26]  S. Carn,et al.  New-generation NASA Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument ( OMI ) volcanic SO 2 dataset : algorithm description , initial results , and continuation with the Suomi-NPP Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite ( OMPS ) , 2016 .

[27]  David G. Streets,et al.  Aura OMI observations of regional SO2 and NO2 pollution changes from 2005 to 2015 , 2015 .

[28]  Can Li,et al.  A new method for global retrievals of HCHO total columns from the Suomi National Polar‐orbiting Partnership Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite , 2015 .

[29]  N. Krotkov,et al.  Lifetimes and emissions of SO2 from point sources estimated from OMI , 2015 .

[30]  P. Bhartia,et al.  A total ozone‐dependent ozone profile climatology based on ozonesondes and Aura MLS data , 2015 .

[31]  Nicolas Theys,et al.  Sulfur dioxide vertical column DOAS retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Global observations and comparison to ground‐based and satellite data , 2015 .

[32]  A. Piazzalunga,et al.  High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China , 2014, Nature.

[33]  Can Li,et al.  A fast and sensitive new satellite SO2 retrieval algorithm based on principal component analysis: Application to the ozone monitoring instrument , 2013 .

[34]  Zifeng Lu,et al.  Ozone monitoring instrument observations of interannual increases in SO2 emissions from Indian coal-fired power plants during 2005-2012. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  Kai Yang,et al.  First observations of SO2 from the satellite Suomi NPP OMPS: Widespread air pollution events over China , 2013 .

[36]  Zbigniew Klimont,et al.  The last decade of global anthropogenic sulfur dioxide: 2000–2011 emissions , 2013 .

[37]  Nickolay A. Krotkov,et al.  Estimation of SO2 emissions using OMI retrievals , 2011 .

[38]  Xiong Liu,et al.  Retrievals of sulfur dioxide from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment 2 (GOME‐2) using an optimal estimation approach: Algorithm and initial validation , 2011 .

[39]  Andreas Hilboll,et al.  An improved NO 2 retrieval for the GOME-2 satellite instrument , 2011 .

[40]  Joanna Joiner,et al.  What do satellite backscatter ultraviolet and visible spectrometers see over snow and ice? A study of clouds and ozone using the A-train , 2010 .

[41]  Kebin He,et al.  Recent large reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions from Chinese power plants observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument , 2010 .

[42]  Nickolay A. Krotkov,et al.  Retrieval of vertical columns of sulfur dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air mass factor algorithm development, validation, and error analysis , 2009 .

[43]  John P. Burrows,et al.  SO 2 Retrieval from SCIAMACHY using the Weighting Function DOAS (WFDOAS) technique: comparison with Standard DOAS retrieval , 2008 .

[44]  R. Spurr LIDORT and VLIDORT: Linearized pseudo-spherical scalar and vector discrete ordinate radiative transfer models for use in remote sensing retrieval problems , 2008 .

[45]  N. Krotkov,et al.  Aircraft observations of dust and pollutants over northeast China: Insight into the meteorological mechanisms of transport , 2007 .

[46]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  Retrieval of large volcanic SO2 columns from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Comparison and limitations , 2007 .

[47]  Alexander A. Kokhanovsky,et al.  Light Scattering Reviews 2 , 2007 .

[48]  Joanna Joiner,et al.  First results from the OMI rotational Raman scattering cloud pressure algorithm , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[49]  Kai Yang,et al.  Band residual difference algorithm for retrieval of SO/sub 2/ from the aura ozone monitoring instrument (OMI) , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[50]  Heikki Saari,et al.  The ozone monitoring instrument , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[51]  Ziauddin Ahmad,et al.  Spectral properties of backscattered UV radiation in cloudy atmospheres , 2004 .

[52]  James F. Gleason,et al.  An improved retrieval of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from GOME , 2002 .

[53]  J. Hovenier,et al.  A fast method for retrieval of cloud parameters using oxygen A band measurements from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment , 2001 .

[54]  O. Boucher,et al.  Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: A review , 2000 .

[55]  J. Burrows,et al.  Tropospheric sulfur dioxide observed by the ERS‐2 GOME instrument , 1998 .

[56]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1998 .

[57]  Joyce E. Penner,et al.  An assessment of the radiative effects of anthropogenic sulfate , 1997 .

[58]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  Long-Term Effects of Acid Rain: Response and Recovery of a Forest Ecosystem , 1996, Science.

[59]  R. Mcpeters,et al.  Effect of partially-clouded scenes on the determination of ozone , 1994 .