Whatever Happened to the Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis?

There is a fairly common pattern in the way social psychology’s major theoretical conceptions have changed in the past four decades. The Hegelian view of history envisions a regular sequence: thesis, antithesis, and synthesis; a proposition is advanced which generates opposing ideas and the apparent contradiction is then reconciled at a higher order of abstraction. This last step is not particularly obvious in recent social psychological theorizing. Thesis leads to antithesis but the final result, more often than not, appears to be a narrowing of the original conception rather than a broader synthesis. The conditioning formulations of the 1930s and 1940s have now been confined to a relatively limited sphere, primarily involving some types of involuntary emotional and attitudinal reactions. Cognitive dissonance theory seems more and more to be concerned mainly with the individual’s attempt to preserve his pride and is no longer king of all it surveys. The frustration-aggression hypothesis advanced by Dollard et al. in 1939 has seen the same developments. Although this formulation is best known for its central notion-that frustrations produce an instigation to aggression-the I939 statement was actually a far-ranging collection of interrelated ideas that grew out of a mixture of psychoanalysis and the dominant stimulus-response orientation of the prewar era. Helped by this amalgam and the fame of its authors, but also aided to a considerable extent by its sweep and simplicity, this statement has attracted a great deal of attention. It offered a readily grasped account of one ofthe most important aspects of life, aggression. However, the thesis was also quickly countered by antithesis as other social scientists rushed in with opposing arguments. The outcome has been not a broader synthesis but a sharper analysis. As a consequence, we must now restrict the scope of the frustration-aggression hypothesis.

[1]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Stimulus characteristics that can enhance or decrease aggression: Associations with prior positive or negative reinforcements for aggression , 1977 .

[2]  R. Geen,et al.  The Catharsis of Aggression: An Evaluation of a Hypothesis , 1977 .

[3]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Emotional arousal and aggressive behavior. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Effects of a stimulus associated with a victim's pain on later aggression. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  V. Konečni,et al.  The mediation of aggressive behavior: arousal level versus anger and cognitive labeling. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Some determinants of impulsive aggression: role of mediated associations with reinforcements for aggression. , 1974, Psychological review.

[7]  D. Zillmann,et al.  Excitation transfer from physical exercise to subsequent aggressive behavior. , 1972 .

[8]  A. Bandura Aggression: a social learning analysis , 1971 .

[9]  J. P. Scott Theoretical Issues Concerning the Origin and Causes of Fighting , 1971 .

[10]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Experimental investigations of hostility catharsis. , 1970, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[11]  J. P. Scott Biology and human aggression. , 1970, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[12]  K. Schaie,et al.  Effects of aggressing "alone" or "with another" on physiological and psychological arousal. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Leonard Berkowitz,et al.  The Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis Revisited , 1969 .

[14]  L. Berkowitz Roots of aggression : a re-examination of the frustration-aggression hypothesis , 1969 .

[15]  R. Ulrich Pain as a cause of aggression. , 1966, American zoologist.

[16]  D F Hake,et al.  Extinction-induced aggression. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[17]  Robert B. Zajonc,et al.  Social psychology : an experimental approach , 1966 .

[18]  D. C. Glass CHANGES IN LIKING AS A MEANS OF REDUCING COGNITIVE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN SELF-ESTEEM AND AGGRESSION. , 1964, Journal of personality.

[19]  S. Feshbach,et al.  THE FUNCTION OF AGGRESSION AND THE REGULATION OF AGGRESSIVE DRIVE. , 1964, Psychological review.

[20]  L. Berkowitz,et al.  Aggression: A Social Psychological Analysis. , 1964 .

[21]  S. Schachter The Interaction of Cognitive and Physiological Determinants of Emotional State , 1964 .

[22]  A. Bandura,et al.  Social learning and personality development , 1964 .

[23]  E. Burnstein,et al.  Arbitrariness of frustration and its consequences for aggression in a social situation. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[24]  R. Ulrich,et al.  Reflexive fighting in response to aversive stimulation. , 1962, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[25]  J. Hokanson,et al.  The effects of three types of aggression on vascular processes. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[26]  C. B. Ferster Withdrawal of positive reinforcement as punishment. , 1957, Science.

[27]  N. Pastore The role of arbitrariness in the frustration-aggression hypothesis. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  N. Miller I. The frustration-aggression hypothesis. , 1941 .

[29]  S. Britt,et al.  Criteria of frustration , 1940 .

[30]  N. Miller,et al.  Frustration and aggression , 1939 .