National field evaluation of a defined substrate method for the simultaneous enumeration of total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking water: comparison with the standard multiple tube fermentation method

A defined substrate method was developed to simultaneously enumerate total coliforms and Escherichia coli from drinking waters without the need for confirmatory or completed tests. It is a new method based on technology that uses a hydrolyzable substrate as a specific indicator-nutrient for the target microbes. No equipment other than a 35 degrees C incubator and long-wavelength (366-nm) light is necessary. To perform the test, one only has to add water to the powdered ingredients in a tube or flask. If total coliforms are present in the water sample, the solution will change from its normal colorless state (no target microbes present) to yellow. The specific presence of E. coli will cause the same tube to fluoresce under a longwave (366-nm) UV lamp. The test, called Autoanalysis Colilert (AC), was compared with Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 10-tube multiple tube fermentation (MTF) in a national evaluation. Five utilities, representing six U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regions, participated. All water samples came from distribution systems. Split samples from a wide variety of water sources were analyzed for the MPN-versus-MPN comparison. A total of 1,086 tubes were positive by MTF, and 1,279 were positive by AC. There was no statistical difference between MTF and AC. Species identifications from positive tubes confirmed the sensitivity of the AC. A national evaluation of the AC test showed that it: (i) was as sensitive as Standard Methods MTF, (ii) specifically enumerated 1 total coliform per 100 ml, in a maximum of 24 h, (iii) simultaneously enumerated 1 E. coli per 100 ml in the same analysis, (iv) was not subject to false-positive or false-negative results by heterotrophic bacteria, (v) did not require confirmatory tests, (vi) grew injured coliforms, (vii) was easy to inoculate, and (viii) was very easy to interpret.

[1]  P. Hartman,et al.  A note on starch hydrolysis and β‐glucuronidase activity among flavobacteria , 1986 .

[2]  Detection of elevated levels of coliform bacteria in a public water supply--Connecticut. , 1985, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[3]  G A McFeters,et al.  Survival of coliform bacteria in natural waters: field and laboratory studies with membrane-filter chambers. , 1972, Applied microbiology.

[4]  T. Stukel,et al.  Comparison of membrane filter, multiple-fermentation-tube, and presence-absence techniques for detecting total coliforms in small community water systems , 1986, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[5]  M. Lechevallier,et al.  Failure of the most-probable-number technique to detect coliforms in drinking water and raw water supplies , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[6]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[7]  A. El-Shaarawi,et al.  Statistical approach for comparison between methods of bacterial enumeration in drinking water , 1985 .

[8]  P. Gubbins,et al.  A critical appraisal of the membrane filter technic. , 1965, Health laboratory science.

[9]  G. McFeters,et al.  Evaluation of Recovery Methods to Detect Coliforms in Water , 1977, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  Edwin E. Geldreich,et al.  The Necessity of Controlling Bacterial Populations in Potable Waters: Community Water Supply , 1972 .

[11]  G. Cameron,et al.  A comparison of the membrane filter with the most probable number method for coliform determinations from several waters. , 1954, Applied microbiology.

[12]  S. Edberg,et al.  Phenotypic Characteristics of Coliform and Noncoliform Bacteria from a Public Water Supply Compared with Regional and National Clinical Species , 1987, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[13]  M. Lechevallier,et al.  Influence of diluents, media, and membrane filters on detection fo injured waterborne coliform bacteria , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[14]  S. Edberg,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and Conventional Media Systems for Identification of Enterobacteriaceae , 1979, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[15]  M. Lechevallier,et al.  Coliform species recovered from untreated surface water and drinking water by the membrane filter, standard, and modified most-probable-number techniques , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[16]  M. Lechevallier,et al.  New medium for improved recovery of coliform bacteria from drinking water , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .