NONSTANDARD DISCRETIZATIONS FOR FLUID FLOWS

Computational Fluid Dynamics is a field on the interface between Numerical Analysis, Computational Science, Physics and Engineering. It underwent an intensive development primarily because of the needs of aeronautics, nuclear physics and engineering, geophysics, chemical and automotive engineering etc., and the rapid development of fast computers. The major efforts are concentrated on the efficient numerical approximation of the solution of the incompressible, quasi-compressible and compressible Navier-Stokes or Euler equations, sometimes in conjunction with additional advection-diffusion systems for transport of heat or substances. Relatively recently, the scope of problems was widened by considering fluid structure interaction, MHD and non-Newtonian fluids, which introduced some major new challenges. In addition, the development of models for multiphase flows, biofluids, micro/nanofluids is a challenge by itself, and it is far from being completed yet. The focus of this workshop was on the development and analysis of new algorithms as well as the practical solution of some very challenging physical problems (which themselves require some non-standard thinking even if more classical techniques are used). The common ground for all these models is that they comprise nonlinear advection-diffusion(-reaction) equations with linear constraints. Depending on the parameters of the system, they can exhibit the whole scale from a predominantly parabolic/elliptic behaviour (low Reynolds number flows) up to a predominantly hyperbolic behaviour (the Euler system). Other challenges are the (sometimes very strong) non-linearity of the problems, the presence of constraints which necessarily lead to saddle point systems, the appearance of more than one spatial and/or temporal scale, etc. All these make the development of a universal and optimal algorithm impossible and stimulated the development of various methods for the various classes of problems. Several major classical discretization techniques have been developed, based on finite difference, finite element, finite volume and spectral methods. More recently, we witnessed the development of some new interesting techniques like the hp finite elements, discontinuous Galerkin methods and other non-conforming or div-conformingmethods, unstructured finite volumes, domain decomposition and mortar techniques. In case of advection-dominated flows, these techniques are combined with various stabilization mechanisms: edge stabilization; residualand entropy-based viscosity; and special fluxes for discontinuous Galerkin schemes. These are closely related to some recent approaches for turbulence modelling like subgrid viscosity, variational multiscale methods and large eddy simulation. A major development in all these areas was the idea for a posteriori error estimation and nonlinear adaptivity. The discretization of time dependent problems

[1]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[2]  G. Dziuk Finite Elements for the Beltrami operator on arbitrary surfaces , 1988 .

[3]  Une analyse de la méthode des domaines fictifs pour le problème de Helmholtz extérieur , 1993 .

[4]  Roger Pierre,et al.  On the discrete EVSS method , 2000 .

[5]  W. Layton,et al.  A connection between subgrid scale eddy viscosity and mixed methods , 2002, Appl. Math. Comput..

[6]  C. Peskin The immersed boundary method , 2002, Acta Numerica.

[7]  L. Heltai,et al.  A finite element approach to the immersed boundary method , 2003 .

[8]  T. Belytschko,et al.  An Extended Finite Element Method for Two-Phase Fluids , 2003 .

[9]  P. Sheng,et al.  Molecular Hydrodynamics of the Moving Contact Line in Two-Phase Immiscible Flows , 2005, cond-mat/0510403.

[10]  Guido Kanschat,et al.  A locally conservative LDG method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2004, Math. Comput..

[11]  P. Sheng,et al.  A variational approach to moving contact line hydrodynamics , 2006, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  An Interior Penalty Variational Multiscale Method for High Reynolds Number Flows , 2006 .

[13]  B. Maury,et al.  One time‐step finite element discretization of the equation of motion of two‐fluid flows , 2006 .

[14]  T. Blake The physics of moving wetting lines. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  Robert G. Owens,et al.  A new microstructure-based constitutive model for human blood , 2006 .

[16]  Erik Burman,et al.  On nonlinear artificial viscosity, discrete maximum principle and hyperbolic conservation laws , 2007 .

[17]  Miguel A. Fernández,et al.  Continuous interior penalty finite element method for the time-dependent Navier–Stokes equations: space discretization and convergence , 2007, Numerische Mathematik.

[18]  R. EYMARD,et al.  Convergence Analysis of a Colocated Finite Volume Scheme for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations on General 2D or 3D Meshes , 2007, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[19]  Arnold Reusken,et al.  An extended pressure finite element space for two-phase incompressible flows with surface tension , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[20]  Guido Kanschat,et al.  A Note on Discontinuous Galerkin Divergence-free Solutions of the Navier–Stokes Equations , 2007, J. Sci. Comput..

[21]  Luca Heltai,et al.  On the CFL condition for the finite element immersed boundary method , 2007 .

[22]  R. Codina Analysis of a stabilized finite element approximation of the Oseen equations using orthogonal subscales , 2008 .

[23]  Guido Kanschat,et al.  Energy norm a posteriori error estimation for divergence‐free discontinuous Galerkin approximations of the Navier–Stokes equations , 2008 .

[24]  R. Eymard,et al.  Discretisation of heterogeneous and anisotropic diffusion problems on general non-conforming meshes. SUSHI: a scheme using stabilisation and hybrid interfaces , 2008, 0801.1430.

[25]  L. Heltai,et al.  On the hyper-elastic formulation of the immersed boundary method , 2008 .

[26]  Abner J. Salgado,et al.  A fractional step method based on a pressure Poisson equation for incompressible flows with variable density , 2008 .

[27]  Erik Burman,et al.  Weighted error estimates of the continuous interior penalty method for singularly perturbed problems , 2008 .

[28]  Sashikumaar Ganesan,et al.  An accurate finite element scheme with moving meshes for computing 3D‐axisymmetric interface flows , 2008 .

[29]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  Deflated preconditioned conjugate gradient solvers for the Pressure-Poisson equation , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[30]  Cornelis Vuik,et al.  Comparison of Two-Level Preconditioners Derived from Deflation, Domain Decomposition and Multigrid Methods , 2009, J. Sci. Comput..

[31]  Philippe Moireau,et al.  Filtering-based data assimilation in fluid-structure interaction: towards personalization of vascular models , 2009 .

[32]  Sashikumaar Ganesan,et al.  A coupled arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian and Lagrangian method for computation of free surface flows with insoluble surfactants , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[33]  P. Tallec,et al.  Filtering for distributed mechanical systems using position measurements: perspectives in medical imaging , 2009 .

[34]  Jerónimo Paredes Cáceres Simulación numérica de algunos problemas de mecánica de fluidos con frontera libre , 2009 .

[35]  Ramon Codina,et al.  Subscales on the element boundaries in the variational two-scale finite element method , 2009 .

[36]  Abner J. Salgado,et al.  A splitting method for incompressible flows with variable density based on a pressure Poisson equation , 2009, J. Comput. Phys..

[37]  Gert Lube,et al.  Analysis of a variational multiscale method for Large-Eddy simulation and its application to homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 2010 .

[38]  Jean-Luc Guermond,et al.  A new class of fractional step techniques for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations using direction splitting , 2010 .

[39]  G. Lube,et al.  On Robust Parallel Preconditioning for Incompressible Flow Problems , 2010 .

[40]  Jie Shen,et al.  A Phase-Field Model and Its Numerical Approximation for Two-Phase Incompressible Flows with Different Densities and Viscosities , 2010, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[41]  Alexandre Ern,et al.  Discrete functional analysis tools for Discontinuous Galerkin methods with application to the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 2010, Math. Comput..

[42]  D. Schötzau,et al.  A mixed finite element method with exactly divergence-free velocities for incompressible magnetohydrodynamics , 2010 .

[43]  Ramon Codina,et al.  Finite element approximation of transmission conditions in fluids and solids introducing boundary subgrid scales , 2011 .

[44]  Erik Burman,et al.  ANALYSIS OF THE SPACE SEMI-DISCRETIZED SUPG METHOD FOR TRANSIENT CONVECTION-DIFFUSION EQUATIONS , 2011 .

[45]  Daniele A. Di Pietro,et al.  A pressure-correction scheme for convection-dominated incompressible flows with discontinuous velocity and continuous pressure , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[46]  Erik Burman,et al.  Analysis of the PSPG method for the transient Stokes’ problem , 2011 .

[47]  V. John,et al.  A posteriori optimization of parameters in stabilized methods for convection-diffusion problems - Part II , 2011, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[48]  Johannes Löwe,et al.  A Projection-Based Variational Multiscale Method for Large-Eddy Simulation with Application to Non-Isothermal Free Convection Problems , 2012 .