Towards Robust Calculation of Interannual CO2 Growth Signal from TCCON (Total Carbon Column Observing Network)

The CO2 growth rate is one of the key geophysical quantities reflecting the dynamics of climate change as atmospheric CO2 growth is the primary driver of global warming. As recent studies have shown that TCCON (Total Carbon Column Observing Network) measurement footprints embrace quasi-global coverage, we examined the sensitivity of TCCON to the global CO2 growth. To this end, we used the aggregated TCCON observations (2006-2019) to retrieve Annual Growth Rate of CO2 (AGR) at global scales. The global AGR estimates from TCCON (AGRTCCON) are robust and independent, from (a) the station-wise seasonality, from (b) the differences in time series across the TCCON stations, and from (c) the type of TCCON stations used in the calculation (“background” or “contaminated” by neighboring CO2 sources). The AGRTCCON potential error, due to the irregular data sampling is relatively low (2.4–17.9%). In 2006–2019, global AGRTCCON ranged from the minimum of 1.59 ± 2.27 ppm (2009) to the maximum of 3.27 ± 0.82 ppm (2016), whereas the uncertainties express sub-annual variability and the data gap effects. The global AGRTCCON magnitude is similar to the reference AGR from satellite data (AGRSAT = 1.57–2.94 ppm) and the surface-based estimates of Global Carbon Budget (AGRGCB = 1.57–2.85). The highest global CO2 growth rate (2015/2016), caused by the record El Niño, was nearly perfectly reproduced by the TCCON (AGRTCCON = 3.27 ± 0.82 ppm vs. AGRSAT = 3.23 ± 0.50 ppm). The overall agreement between global AGRTCCON with the AGR references was yet weakened (r = 0.37 for TCCON vs. SAT; r = 0.50 for TCCON vs. GCB) due to two years (2008, 2015). We identified the drivers of this disagreement; in 2008, when only few stations were available worldwide, the AGRTCCON uncertainties were excessively high (AGRTCCON = 2.64 ppm with 3.92 ppm or 148% uncertainty). Moreover, in 2008 and 2015, the ENSO-driven bias between global AGRTCCON and the AGR references were detected. TCCON-to-reference agreement is dramatically increased if the years with ENSO-related biases (2008, 2015) are forfeited (r = 0.67 for TCCON vs. SAT, r = 0.82 for TCCON vs. GCB). To conclude, this is the first study that showed promising ability of aggregated TCCON signal to capture global CO2 growth. As the TCCON coverage is expanding, and new versions of TCCON data are being published, multiple data sampling strategies, dynamically changing TCCON global measurement footprint, and the irregular sensitivity of AGRTCCON to strong ENSO events; all should be analyzed to transform the current efforts into a first operational algorithm for retrieving global CO2 growth from TCCON data.

[1]  Robert Joseph Andres,et al.  The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic Carbon dioxide (CO2), version 2016 (ODIAC2016): A global, monthly fossil-fuel CO2 gridded emission data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions. , 2017, Earth system science data.

[2]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Carbon cycle feedbacks and future climate change , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  M. Dubey,et al.  The carbon cycle response to two El Nino types: an observational study , 2018 .

[4]  Michael Buchwitz,et al.  First direct observation of the atmospheric CO 2 year-to-year increase from space , 2007 .

[5]  Sujong Jeong,et al.  Working towards confident spaceborne monitoring of carbon emissions from cities using Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[6]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake , 2016, Nature Communications.

[7]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2018 , 2014, Earth System Science Data.

[8]  Luiz E. O. C. Aragão,et al.  A successful prediction of the record CO2 rise associated with the 2015/2016 El Niño , 2018, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Yi Y. Liu,et al.  Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle , 2014, Nature.

[10]  R. DeFries,et al.  Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system , 2013 .

[11]  J. Canadell,et al.  Towards real-time verification of CO2 emissions , 2017, Nature Climate Change.

[12]  S. Fang,et al.  Simulation of CO2 variations at Chinese background atmospheric monitoring stations between 2000 and 2009: Applying a CarbonTracker model , 2013 .

[13]  O. Hasekamp,et al.  Ensemble-based satellite-derived carbon dioxide and methane column-averaged dry-air mole fraction data sets (2003–2018) for carbon and climate applications , 2020 .

[14]  David Crisp,et al.  Improved retrievals of carbon dioxide from Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 with the version 8 ACOS algorithm , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[15]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Does GOSAT capture the true seasonal cycle of carbon dioxide , 2015 .

[16]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  A two-fold increase of carbon cycle sensitivity to tropical temperature variations , 2014, Nature.

[17]  Ye Yuan,et al.  Comparison of Continuous In-Situ CO2 Measurements with Co-Located Column-Averaged XCO2 TCCON/Satellite Observations and CarbonTracker Model Over the Zugspitze Region , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[18]  Jay R. Herman,et al.  Multiscale observations of CO2, 13CO2, and pollutants at Four Corners for emission verification and attribution , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Global Carbon Budget 2019 , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[21]  M. Saunois,et al.  Atmospheric transport and chemistry of trace gases in LMDz5B: evaluation and implications for inverse modelling , 2014 .

[22]  F. Hase,et al.  Analysis of total column CO2 and CH4 measurements in Berlin with WRF-GHG , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[23]  E. A. Kort,et al.  Enhanced Seasonal Exchange of CO2 by Northern Ecosystems Since 1960 , 2013, Science.

[24]  Pauli Heikkinen,et al.  Fourier transform spectrometer measurements of column CO 2 at Sodankylä, Finland , 2016 .

[25]  Sujong Jeong,et al.  Intensification of terrestrial carbon cycle related to El Niño–Southern Oscillation under greenhouse warming , 2017, Nature Communications.

[26]  James B. Abshire,et al.  Calibration of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network using aircraft profile data , 2010 .

[27]  Peter Bergamaschi,et al.  European Geosciences Union Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , 2005 .

[28]  P. Ciais,et al.  In situ measurement of atmospheric CO 2 at the four WMO/GAW stations in China , 2013 .

[29]  J. Canadell,et al.  Interannual variation of terrestrial carbon cycle: Issues and perspectives , 2019, Global change biology.

[30]  Dell,et al.  Contrasting carbon cycle responses of the tropical continents to the 2015–2016 El Niño , 2017, Science.

[31]  D. Griffith,et al.  Characteristics of greenhouse gas concentrations derived from ground-based FTS spectra at Anmyeondo, South Korea , 2018 .

[32]  Maximilian Reuter,et al.  Terrestrial carbon sink observed from space: variation of growth rates and seasonal cycle amplitudes in response to interannual surface temperature variability , 2013 .

[33]  D. Randall,et al.  Simulations of terrestrial carbon metabolism and atmospheric CO2 in a general circulation model: Part 2: Simulated CO2 concentrations , 1996 .

[34]  K. Bowman,et al.  An assessment of emission characteristics of Northern Hemisphere cities using spaceborne observations of CO2, CO, and NO2 , 2021 .

[35]  Justus Notholt,et al.  The Total Carbon Column Observing Network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[36]  Hartmut Boesch,et al.  Study of the footprints of short-term variation in XCO2 observed by TCCON sites using NIES and FLEXPART atmospheric transport models , 2016, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[37]  F. Joos,et al.  Atmospheric CO2 response to volcanic eruptions: The role of ENSO, season, and variability , 2013 .

[38]  F. Chevallier,et al.  Net carbon emissions from African biosphere dominate pan-tropical atmospheric CO2 signal , 2019, Nature Communications.

[39]  David Crisp,et al.  Comparisons of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) X CO 2 measurements with TCCON , 2016 .

[40]  M. Friedl,et al.  A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data , 2009 .

[41]  M. Allen,et al.  The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers , 2017, Climatic Change.

[42]  D. Wunch,et al.  Evaluation of seasonal atmosphere–biosphere exchange estimations with TCCON measurements , 2013 .

[43]  S. Piper,et al.  Climate effects on atmospheric carbon dioxide over the last century , 2007 .

[44]  Diego Macias,et al.  On the causal structure between CO2 and global temperature , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Frédéric Chevallier,et al.  On the parallelization of atmospheric inversions of CO 2 surface fluxes within a variational framework , 2013 .

[46]  John Robinson,et al.  Consistent evaluation of ACOS-GOSAT, BESD-SCIAMACHY, CarbonTracker, and MACC through comparisons to TCCON , 2015 .

[47]  J. Canadell,et al.  Variations in atmospheric CO2 growth rates coupled with tropical temperature , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  E. Kort,et al.  Global atmospheric CO2 inverse models converging on neutral tropical land exchange, but disagreeing on fossil fuel and atmospheric growth rate , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[49]  Ralf Sussmann,et al.  Can We Measure a COVID-19-Related Slowdown in Atmospheric CO2 Growth? Sensitivity of Total Carbon Column Observations , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[50]  R. Betts,et al.  El Nino and a record CO2 rise , 2016 .

[51]  Bettina K. Gier,et al.  Computation and analysis of atmospheric carbon dioxide annual mean growth rates from satellite observations during 2003–2016 , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[52]  C. S. Wong,et al.  Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net seaair CO2 flux over the global oceans , 2009 .