Exploring WAI-Aria Techniques to Enhance Screen Reader Interaction: The Case of a Portal for Rating Accessibility of Cultural Heritage Sites

Cultural heritage sites (museums, archaeological parks, exhibition spaces, etc.) do not always guarantee accessibility to all users, regardless of their abilities. Often services are not really as usable and functional as expected. Currently there is no website offering accessibility information on heritage sites in a format accessible to all. People with disability or their caregivers are forced to spend considerable time and effort to obtain accessibility information, sometimes encountering difficulties. The Axem portal aims to fill this gap by offering information on the degree of accessibility of cultural sites (museums, archaeological parks, libraries, art galleries, places of worship, exhibition spaces, etc.). It has been designed as a facility for people with disabilities and in general for all individuals who have special needs and require specific services. In this paper the Axem web site is presented as a case study to (1) investigate the use of web techniques for enhancing screen reading interaction, and (2) propose a portal to collect information on accessible services supported by the cultural sites. Regarding web accessibility, the use of WAI ARIA, an accessible web design, is discussed in order to improve screen reading interaction. Accessibility functions and features as well as the ranking algorithm for easy search and the rating mechanism are presented. This work offers a further contribution to the web accessibility field, while proposing a portal which could be exploited by cultural heritage sites and promote their accessible services to people with disability.

[1]  Massimo Bergamasco,et al.  Beyond virtual museums: experiencing immersive virtual reality in real museums , 2010 .

[2]  Spyros Vosinakis,et al.  Accessible museum collections for the visually impaired: combining tactile exploration, audio descriptions and mobile gestures , 2016, MobileHCI Adjunct.

[3]  Ingrid Zukerman,et al.  Non-intrusive Personalisation of the Museum Experience , 2009, UMAP.

[4]  Katerina Kabassi,et al.  Evaluating websites of museums: State of the art , 2017 .

[5]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Accessing Google Docs via Screen Reader , 2010, ICCHP.

[6]  Caterina Balletti,et al.  TOOTEKO: A CASE STUDY OF AUGMENTED REALITY FOR AN ACCESSIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE. DIGITIZATION, 3D PRINTING AND SENSORS FOR AN AUDIO-TACTILE EXPERIENCE , 2015 .

[7]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  Art, science/technology and history museums on the web. , 2008 .

[8]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Editing Wikipedia content by screen reader: Easier interaction with the Accessible Rich Internet Applications suite , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[9]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Enabling Access to Cultural Heritage for the visually impaired: an Interactive 3D model of a Cultural Site , 2018, ANT/SEIT.

[10]  L. Mainetti,et al.  An Indoor Location-Aware System for an IoT-Based Smart Museum , 2016, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[11]  Lars Schmidt-Thieme,et al.  RFID-Enhanced Museum for Interactive Experience , 2011, MM4CH.

[12]  Constantine Stephanidis,et al.  Accessibility of Cultural Heritage Exhibits , 2016, HCI.

[13]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Supporting orientation for blind people using museum guides , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Ole Iversen,et al.  Participatory design at the museum: inquiring into children's everyday engagement in cultural heritage , 2010, OZCHI '10.

[15]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Applying Web Usability Criteria for Vision-Impaired Users: Does It Really Improve Task Performance? , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  João Guerreiro,et al.  An Independent and Interactive Museum Experience for Blind People , 2019, W4A.