Libcitations, worldcat, cultural impact, and fame
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Howard D. White. Better Than Brief Tests: Coverage Power Tests of Collection Strength , 2008 .
[2] Mike Thelwall,et al. Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[3] Fletcher T. H. Cole,et al. Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[4] Ludo Waltman,et al. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[5] Björn Hammarfelt. Beyond coverage : Toward a bibliometrics for the humanities , 2016 .
[6] T. Rajaretnam,et al. Statistics for social sciences , 2016 .
[7] Mike Thelwall,et al. Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[8] Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al. PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books , 2017, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..
[9] L. Bornmann,et al. How good is research really? , 2013, EMBO reports.
[10] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[11] Mike Thelwall,et al. Arts and humanities research evaluation: no metrics please, just data , 2015, J. Documentation.
[12] William Denton. On Dentographs, A New Method of Visualizing Library Collections , 2012 .
[13] Alesia Zuccalá,et al. Correlating Libcitations and Citations in the Humanities with WorldCat and Scopus Data , 2015, ISSI.
[14] Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al. Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics , 2009, J. Informetrics.
[15] Maarten van Someren,et al. A machine‐learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators: Toward a theory of megacitation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[16] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[17] Sven E. Hug,et al. The future of research assessment in the humanities: bottom-up assessment procedures , 2017, Palgrave Communications.
[18] Rens Bod,et al. Can we rank scholarly book publishers? A bibliometric experiment with the field of history , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] Dietmar Wolfram,et al. Citer analysis as a measure of research impact: library and information science as a case study , 2010, Scientometrics.
[20] Judit Bar-Ilan,et al. The Complexity of Measuring the Impact of Books , 2016 .
[21] A. J. M. Linmans,et al. Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link , 2010, Scientometrics.
[22] Chengzhi Zhang,et al. Measuring book impact based on the multi-granularity online review mining , 2016, Scientometrics.
[23] Melissa Adler,et al. Transcending Library Catalogs: A Comparative Study of Controlled Terms in Library of Congress Subject Headings and User-Generated Tags in LibraryThing for Transgender Books , 2009 .
[24] Alesia A. Zuccala,et al. Comparing book citations in humanities journals to library holdings : scholarly use versus 'perceived cultural benefit' (RIP) , 2013 .
[25] Mike Thelwall,et al. Alternative Metrics for Book Impact Assessment: Can Choice Reviews be a Useful Source? , 2015, ISSI.
[26] Mike Thelwall,et al. Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Michael Thelwall,et al. Web Indicators for Research Evaluation: A Practical Guide , 2016, Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services.