Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling.

T here is no current consensus for objectively evaluating postoperative smiling outcome. Several objective measurement systems have been proposed, but, owing to their complexity, cumbersome nature, or cost, no single system has been adopted. With such variation in the reporting of results, it is difficult to make comparisons and draw conclusions about the outcome of different surgical techniques. We propose a simple facial analysis system, the scaled measurement of improvement in lip excursion (SMILE), that obviates the need for expensive equipment, facial marking, or prolonged patient cooperation. The system uses the iris diameter (corneal white-to-white diameter) as a scale reference for all facial dimensions on the same photograph. Rüfer et al measured the corneal white-to-white diameter in 390 healthy subjects aged 10 to 80 years with the Orbscan II system (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York). They found the mean(SD)cornealdiameterwas11.77(0.42)mm.Withsuch small variation inhuman irisdiameter, thisbuilt-in scale— inthesameplaneas theoralcommissure—allows“real-life” millimetricmeasurementsofhorizontal toverticalcommissureexcursion tobeextrapolated fromfrontalphotographs using readily available photoediting software.

[1]  K. Murata,et al.  An Objective Evaluation Method for Facial Mimic Motion , 1996 .

[2]  R. Manktelow,et al.  Evaluation of a New Measurement Tool for Facial Paralysis Reconstruction , 2005, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  C. Linstrom,et al.  Facial Motion Analysis with a Video and Computer System after Treatment of Acoustic Neuroma , 2002, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[4]  S E Coulson,et al.  Three-Dimensional Quantification of “Still” Points during Normal Facial Movement , 1999, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[5]  Edgar Stüssi,et al.  Three-Dimensional Video Analysis of the Paralyzed Face Reanimated by Cross-Face Nerve Grafting and Free Gracilis Muscle Transplantation: Quantification of the Functional Outcome , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[6]  E. Sargent,et al.  Measurement of facial movement with computer software. , 1998, Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery.

[7]  U. Fisch,et al.  Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR) , 1998 .

[8]  J. Cohn,et al.  Automated Tracking of Facial Features in Patients with Facial Neuromuscular Dysfunction , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  Florian Rüfer,et al.  White-to-White Corneal Diameter: Normal Values in Healthy Humans Obtained With the Orbscan II Topography System , 2005, Cornea.

[10]  R. Balliet,et al.  Simultaneous Quantitation of Facial Movements: The Maximal Static Response Assay of Facial Nerve Function , 1994, Annals of plastic surgery.