The metamorphosis of the statistical segmentation output: Lexicalization during artificial language learning

This study combined artificial language learning (ALL) with conventional experimental techniques to test whether statistical speech segmentation outputs are integrated into adult listeners' mental lexicon. Lexicalization was assessed through inhibitory effects of novel neighbors (created by the parsing process) on auditory lexical decisions to real words. Both immediately after familiarization and post-one week, ALL outputs were lexicalized only when the cues available during familiarization (transitional probabilities and wordlikeness) suggested the same parsing (Experiments 1 and 3). No lexicalization effect occurred with incongruent cues (Experiments 2 and 4). Yet, ALL differed from chance, suggesting a dissociation between item knowledge and lexicalization. Similarly contrasted results were found when frequency of occurrence of the stimuli was equated during familiarization (Experiments 3 and 4). Our findings thus indicate that ALL outputs may be lexicalized as far as the segmentation cues are congruent, and that this process cannot be accounted for by raw frequency.

[1]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words? , 2007, Psychological science.

[2]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Priming is not all bias: Commentary on Ratcliff and McKoon (1997) , 1999 .

[3]  T. A. Cartwright,et al.  Distributional regularity and phonotactic constraints are useful for segmentation , 1996, Cognition.

[4]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words , 2003, Cognition.

[5]  S. Goldinger Auditory Lexical Decision , 1996 .

[6]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Infants' early ability to segment the conversational speech signal predicts later language development: a retrospective analysis. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[7]  J. Vroomen,et al.  The Roles of Word Stress and Vowel Harmony in Speech Segmentation , 1998 .

[8]  J. Morgan,et al.  Mommy and Me , 2005, Psychological science.

[9]  R. Stickgold,et al.  Sleep-Dependent Learning and Memory Consolidation , 2004, Neuron.

[10]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The phonological-distributional coherence hypothesis: Cross-linguistic evidence in language acquisition , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Marina Nespor,et al.  An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Daniel Swingley,et al.  Statistical clustering and the contents of the infant vocabulary , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  W. Marslen-Wilson Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition , 1987, Cognition.

[14]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[15]  Amy S. Finn,et al.  The curse of knowledge: First language knowledge impairs adult learners’ use of novel statistics for word segmentation , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  Paul Gelderloos,et al.  The transcendental meditation and TM-Sidhi program and reported experiences of transcendental consciousness , 1989 .

[17]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Phonological priming reflects lexical competition , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  When cues collide: use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7- to 9-month-old infants. , 2003, Developmental psychology.

[19]  Todd M. Bailey,et al.  Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? , 2001 .

[20]  M. Gareth Gaskell,et al.  A Day in the Life of a Spoken Word , 2004 .

[21]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[22]  R. Aslin,et al.  Lexical competition in young children’s word learning , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  The time course of spoken word learning and recognition: studies with artificial lexicons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  N. Dumay Effects of vocabulary acquisition on lexical competition in speech perception and production, by M. Gareth Gaskell and Nicolas Dumay , 2003 .

[25]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of Wordlikeness: Effects of Segment Probability and Length on the Processing of Nonwords. , 2000, Journal of memory and language.

[26]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cracking the Language Code: Neural Mechanisms Underlying Speech Parsing , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Word Segmentation by 8-Month-Olds: When Speech Cues Count More Than Statistics , 2001 .

[28]  D. Holender,et al.  Expectancy effects, congruity effects and the interpretation of response latency measurement , 1992 .

[29]  Virginia Valian,et al.  PROSODY AND ADULTS' LEARNING OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURE , 1996 .

[30]  S. Mattys,et al.  Lexical activity in speech processing: Evidence from pause detection , 2002 .

[31]  E. Newport,et al.  Computation of Conditional Probability Statistics by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1998 .

[32]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Learning to Segment Speech Using Multiple Cues: A Connectionist Model , 1998 .

[33]  R. Kolinsky,et al.  Statistical information and coarticulation as cues to word boundaries: A matter of signal quality , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Consolidation during sleep of perceptual learning of spoken language , 2003, Nature.

[35]  R. Shillcock,et al.  Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 1998 .

[36]  S Monsell,et al.  Competitor priming in spoken word recognition. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Speech perception: a model of acoustic–phonetic analysis and lexical access , 1979 .

[38]  Edward T. Auer,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics in Spoken Word Recognition , 2008 .

[39]  D. Swingley,et al.  Lexical exposure and word-form encoding in 1.5-year-olds. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[40]  A. Samuel,et al.  Lexical configuration and lexical engagement: When adults learn new words , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[41]  P. Luce,et al.  Increases in phonotactic probability facilitate spoken nonword repetition. , 2005 .

[42]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[43]  Competition in spoken word recognition: Spotting words in other words , 1994 .

[44]  E. Newport,et al.  WORD SEGMENTATION : THE ROLE OF DISTRIBUTIONAL CUES , 1996 .

[45]  J. Raaijmakers A further look at the "language-as-fixed-effect fallacy". , 2003, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[46]  Thierry Dutoit,et al.  The MBROLA project: towards a set of high quality speech synthesizers free of use for non commercial purposes , 1996, Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP '96.

[47]  P. Luce,et al.  When Words Compete: Levels of Processing in Perception of Spoken Words , 1998 .

[48]  George Houghton,et al.  Connectionist models in cognitive psychology , 2004 .

[49]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  An Investigation of Phonology and Orthography in Spoken-Word Recognition , 2003, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[50]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[51]  U. Frauenfelder,et al.  Inhibitory priming in auditory word recognition: Is it really the product of response biases? , 2007 .

[52]  M. Pitt,et al.  Revisiting bias effects in word-initial phonological priming. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[53]  S. Goldinger Signal detection comparisons of phonemic and phonetic priming: The flexible-bias problem , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[54]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The link between statistical segmentation and word learning in adults , 2008, Cognition.

[55]  J. Raaijmakers,et al.  How to deal with "The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy": Common misconceptions and alternative solutions. , 1999 .

[56]  David A. Balota,et al.  Mental Chronometry: Beyond Reaction Time , 1991 .

[57]  S. Goldinger,et al.  Only the Shadower knows: Comment on Hamburger and Slowiaczek (1996) , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[58]  D. Norris,et al.  Bias effects in facilitatory phonological priming , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[59]  A. Vinter,et al.  PARSER: A Model for Word Segmentation , 1998 .

[60]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  In defense of abstractionist theories of repetition priming and word identification , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[61]  J. Born,et al.  Sleep after learning aids memory recall. , 2006, Learning & memory.

[62]  Elissa L. Newport,et al.  Segmenting nonsense: an event-related potential index of perceived onsets in continuous speech , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Interfering neighbours: The impact of novel word learning on the identification of visually similar words , 2005, Cognition.

[64]  Nick Chater,et al.  Phonology impacts segmentation in online speech processing , 2005 .

[65]  M. Gaskell,et al.  Sleep-Associated Changes in the Mental Representation of Spoken Words , 2007, Psychological science.

[66]  J. McQueen Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[67]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Competition and segmentation in spoken word recognition , 1994, ICSLP.

[68]  S. Goldinger Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  A. Samuel,et al.  Lexical inhibition and sublexical facilitation are surprisingly long lasting. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[70]  D. Holender,et al.  Analytic approaches to human cognition , 1992 .

[71]  J. Morais,et al.  Phonological priming in spoken word recognition: Task effects , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[72]  Laurence White,et al.  Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[73]  Jenny R Saffran,et al.  Words in a sea of sounds: the output of infant statistical learning , 2001, Cognition.

[74]  P. Jusczyk,et al.  Phonotactic cues for segmentation of fluent speech by infants , 2001, Cognition.

[75]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  Prelexical facilitation and lexical interference in auditory word recognition. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[76]  R. Peereman,et al.  Learning Nonadjacent Dependencies: No Need for Algebraic-like Computations Is It Possible to Learn the Relation between 2 Nonadjacent Events? , 2004 .