A model of sensory neural responses in the presence of unknown modulatory inputs

Neural responses are highly variable, and some portion of this variability arises from fluctuations in modulatory factors that alter their gain, such as adaptation, attention, arousal, expected or actual reward, emotion, and local metabolic resource availability. Regardless of their origin, fluctuations in these signals can confound or bias the inferences that one derives from spiking responses. Recent work demonstrates that for sensory neurons, these effects can be captured by a modulated Poisson model, whose rate is the product of a stimulus-driven response function and an unknown modulatory signal. Here, we extend this model, by incorporating explicit modulatory elements that are known (specifically, spike-history dependence, as in previous models), and by constraining the remaining latent modulatory signals to be smooth in time. We develop inference procedures for fitting the entire model, including hyperparameters, via evidence optimization, and apply these to simulated data, and to responses of ferret auditory midbrain and cortical neurons to complex sounds. We show that integrating out the latent modulators yields better (or more readily-interpretable) receptive field estimates than a standard Poisson model. Conversely, integrating out the stimulus dependence yields estimates of the slowly-varying latent modulators.

[1]  Wei Wu,et al.  A new look at state-space models for neural data , 2010, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[2]  Neil C. Rabinowitz,et al.  Constructing Noise-Invariant Representations of Sound in the Auditory Pathway , 2013, PLoS biology.

[3]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  Empirical models of spiking in neural populations , 2011, NIPS.

[4]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population , 2008, Nature.

[5]  G. J. Tomko,et al.  Neuronal variability: non-stationary responses to identical visual stimuli. , 1974, Brain research.

[6]  Jakob H. Macke,et al.  Low-dimensional models of neural population activity in sensory cortical circuits , 2014, NIPS.

[7]  Uri T Eden,et al.  A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  L. Paninski Maximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models , 2004, Network.

[9]  Neil C. Rabinowitz,et al.  Spectrotemporal Contrast Kernels for Neurons in Primary Auditory Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Arnulf B. A. Graf,et al.  Decoding the activity of neuronal populations in macaque primary visual cortex , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Andrew M. Clark,et al.  Stimulus onset quenches neural variability: a widespread cortical phenomenon , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  Mijung Park,et al.  Bayesian inference for low rank spatiotemporal neural receptive fields , 2013, NIPS.

[13]  Maneesh Sahani,et al.  Evidence Optimization Techniques for Estimating Stimulus-Response Functions , 2002, NIPS.

[14]  L. Paninski,et al.  Common-input models for multiple neural spike-train data , 2007, Network.

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Partitioning neuronal variability , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  J. A. Movshon,et al.  The dependence of response amplitude and variance of cat visual cortical neurones on stimulus contrast , 1981, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Jonathan W. Pillow,et al.  Spectral methods for neural characterization using generalized quadratic models , 2013, NIPS.

[18]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Modeling the Impact of Common Noise Inputs on the Network Activity of Retinal Ganglion Cells Action Editor: Brent Doiron , 2022 .

[19]  Mijung Park,et al.  Receptive Field Inference with Localized Priors , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..