Time factors in larynx tumor radiotherapy: lag times and intertumor heterogeneity in clinical datasets from four centers.

PURPOSE To use the time-dependent linear-quadratic model, both in the standard form and in a form modified to incorporate intertumor heterogeneity, in a reanalysis of 4 datasets for larynx tumor control, to provide more representative and direct estimates of the lag period, the time factor (lambda/alpha), and the clonogen population inactivation dose ([lnk]/alpha). METHODS AND MATERIALS The data comprised 2,225 patients treated in Edinburgh (UK), Glasgow (UK), Manchester (UK), or Toronto (Canada), with tumor control assessed after at least 2 years. Heterogeneity in each series was taken into account using the coefficient of variation (CV) of the clonogen radiosensitivity (alpha). Maximum likelihood techniques were used to provide best estimates of the parameters, and also direct estimation of the more stable parameter ratios of interest. RESULTS The use of different heterogeneity factors for the different series allowed common dose/time parameters to be fitted across all four series in a way not possible using the standard model, enabling the inherent effect of heterogeneity in flattening dose-response curves and in reducing time factors to be separated from the underlying more-representative values. Radiosensitivity CVs were calculated to be 30% (Edinburgh), 36% (Glasgow), 40% (Manchester), and 71% (Toronto). The lag phase was 32 days (95% CL 20-38 days) which was longer than the value of 23 days (11-36 days) deduced using the standard model without the heterogeneity parameter. The time factor was 1.2 (0.8-2.2) Gy/day, again greater than the value of 0.80 (0.54-1.41) Gy/day derived using the standard model. Similar larger time factors and longer lag periods could be reproduced using the standard model either by using a parameterization based on parameter ratios, or by omitting the discordant Toronto data and refitting just the data from the three UK centers. CONCLUSION It was concluded that the heterogeneity model provides a better representation of the time factor for tumor control when data are analyzed comprising different stages of disease treated at different centers. The model allows different amounts of heterogeneity in different series, which tend to flatten dose-responses curves and reduce time factors, to be taken in to account. Also, direct maximum likelihood estimates can be made of the lag period, the time factor (lambda/alpha), and the fractionation sensitivity (beta/alpha), as well as the clonogen population inactivation dose (lnk)/alpha. Values of these parameter ratios are more robust and stable than the individual parameter values. The results of the present analysis using a total of 2,225 patients from four centers indicate that the average lag period may be somewhat longer and the average time factor somewhat greater (and the 95% confidence limits of the time factor exclude previous estimates), than the values deduced previously using simpler models and more diverse multi-center datasets.

[1]  S. Bentzen,et al.  Potential clinical impact of normal-tissue intrinsic radiosensitivity testing. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  P. Boyle,et al.  The effect of differing radiotherapeutic schedules on the response of glottic carcinoma of the larynx. , 1993, European journal of cancer.

[3]  J. Haybittle,et al.  Final report of the general clinical results of the British Institute of Radiology fractionation study of 3F/wk versus 5F/wk in radiotherapy of carcinoma of the laryngo-pharynx. , 1990, The British journal of radiology.

[4]  H D Thames,et al.  Direct analysis of quantal radiation response data. , 1986, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[5]  J. Hendry,et al.  Similar decreases in local tumor control are calculated for treatment protraction and for interruptions in the radiotherapy of carcinoma of the larynx in four centers. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  J H Hendry,et al.  A realistic closed-form radiobiological model of clinical tumor-control data incorporating intertumor heterogeneity. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  W. Cleveland Robust Locally Weighted Regression and Smoothing Scatterplots , 1979 .

[8]  J. Hendry,et al.  Influence of radiotherapy treatment time on control of laryngeal cancer: comparisons between centres in Manchester, UK and Toronto, Canada. , 1994, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  W A Brock,et al.  Radiosensitivity of human head and neck squamous cell carcinomas in primary culture and its potential as a predictive assay of tumor radiocurability. , 1989, International journal of radiation biology.

[10]  E. Rofstad,et al.  Radiation sensitivity in vitro of cells isolated from human tumor surgical specimens. , 1987, Cancer research.

[11]  M. Barton,et al.  The effect of treatment time and treatment interruption on tumour control following radical radiotherapy of laryngeal cancer. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  B. Fertil,et al.  Predictive value of in vitro radiosensitivity parameters in head and neck cancers and cervical carcinomas: preliminary correlations with local control and overall survival. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  Dose fractionation and regeneration in radiotherapy for cancer of the oral cavity and oropharynx: tumor dose-response and repopulation. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Jacques Bernier,et al.  Accelerated fractionation (AF) compared to conventional fractionation (CF) improves loco-regional control in the radiotherapy of advanced head and neck cancers: results of the EORTC 22851 randomized trial. , 1997, Radiotherapy and Oncology.

[15]  J. M. Taylor,et al.  The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. , 1988, Acta oncologica.

[16]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[17]  M. I. Saunders,et al.  Randomised multicentre trials of CHART vs conventional radiotherapy in head and neck and non-small-cell lung cancer: an interim report. CHART Steering Committee. , 1996, British Journal of Cancer.

[18]  H D Thames,et al.  The clinical significance of ratios of radiobiological parameters. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  W Duncan,et al.  Adverse effect of treatment gaps in the outcome of radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  J F Fowler,et al.  A modelled comparison of the effects of using different ways to compensate for missed treatment days in radiotherapy. , 1996, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[21]  S. Tucker,et al.  Comments on a time-dependent version of the linear-quadratic model. , 1990, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  J. Haybittle,et al.  Final report on the second British Institute of Radiology fractionation study: short versus long overall treatment times for radiotherapy of carcinoma of the laryngo-pharynx. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  J. Hendry,et al.  Modelling the optimal radiotherapy regime for the control of T2 laryngeal carcinoma using parameters derived from several datasets. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  J H Hendry,et al.  The modelled benefits of individualizing radiotherapy patients' dose using cellular radiosensitivity assays with inherent variability. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  Bentzen Sm Steepness of the Clinical Dose–control Curve and Variation in the in Vitro Radiosensitivity of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 1992 .

[26]  J. Hendry,et al.  The effect of increasing the treatment time beyond three weeks on the control of T2 and T3 laryngeal cancer using radiotherapy. , 1992, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[27]  J. Hendry,et al.  The delay before onset of accelerated tumour cell repopulation during radiotherapy: a direct maximum-likelihood analysis of a collection of worldwide tumour-control data. , 1993, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[28]  R. James,et al.  The in vitro radiosensitivity of human head and neck cancers. , 1998, British Journal of Cancer.

[29]  J. Hendry,et al.  The influence of radiotherapy treatment time on the control of laryngeal cancer: a direct analysis of data from two British Institute of Radiology trials to calculate the lag period and the time factor. , 1994, The British journal of radiology.