Identification of distinct mutational patterns and new driver genes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas

Objectives Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and adenocarcinoma (OAC) are distinct cancers in terms of a number of clinical and epidemiological characteristics, complicating the design of clinical trials and biomarker developments. We analysed 1048 oesophageal tumour-germline pairs from both subtypes, to characterise their genomic features, and biological and clinical significance. Design Previously exome-sequenced samples were re-analysed to identify significantly mutated genes (SMGs) and mutational signatures. The biological functions of novel SMGs were investigated using cell line and xenograft models. We further performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq to characterise epigenetic alterations. Results OSCC and OAC displayed nearly mutually exclusive sets of driver genes, indicating that they follow independent developmental paths. The combined sample size allowed the statistical identification of a number of novel subtype-specific SMGs, mutational signatures and prognostic biomarkers. Particularly, we identified a novel mutational signature similar to Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC)signature 16, which has prognostic value in OSCC. Two newly discovered SMGs, CUL3 and ZFP36L2, were validated as important tumour-suppressors specific to the OSCC subtype. We further identified their additional loss-of-function mechanisms. CUL3 was homozygously deleted specifically in OSCC and other squamous cell cancers (SCCs). Notably, ZFP36L2 is associated with super-enhancer in healthy oesophageal mucosa; DNA hypermethylation in its super-enhancer reduced active histone markers in squamous cancer cells, suggesting an epigenetic inactivation of a super-enhancer-associated SCC suppressor. Conclusions These data comprehensively contrast differences between OSCC and OAC at both genomic and epigenomic levels, and reveal novel molecular features for further delineating the pathophysiological mechanisms and treatment strategies for these cancers.

[1]  Xiaoping Liu,et al.  Genomic and Epigenomic Heterogeneity of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. , 2017, Cancer research.

[2]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated genomic characterization of oesophageal carcinoma , 2017, Nature.

[3]  S. Natsugoe,et al.  ZFP36L2 promotes cancer cell aggressiveness and is regulated by antitumor microRNA‐375 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma , 2017, Cancer science.

[4]  Xinwei Han,et al.  Synergistic anti-cancer effects of galangin and berberine through apoptosis induction and proliferation inhibition in oesophageal carcinoma cells. , 2016, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[5]  Simon Tavaré,et al.  Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Ji-Eun Jung,et al.  The ID1-CULLIN3 Axis Regulates Intracellular SHH and WNT Signaling in Glioblastoma Stem Cells. , 2016, Cell reports.

[7]  Ming-Rong Wang,et al.  Targeting super-enhancer-associated oncogenes in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2016, Gut.

[8]  M. Stratton,et al.  Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer , 2016, Science.

[9]  H. Aburatani,et al.  Genomic Landscape of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in a Japanese Population. , 2016, Gastroenterology.

[10]  Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu,et al.  Distinct patterns of somatic genome alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[11]  Manuel D. Díaz-Muñoz,et al.  RNA-binding proteins ZFP36L1 and ZFP36L2 promote cell quiescence , 2016, Science.

[12]  H. Yamaue,et al.  Expression of ERCC1, TUBB3, BRCA1, and TS as predictive markers of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. , 2016 .

[13]  Cai,et al.  Spatial intratumoral heterogeneity and temporal clonal evolution in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. , 2016 .

[14]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  Anaïs F. Bardet,et al.  Competition between DNA methylation and transcription factors determines binding of NRF1 , 2015, Nature.

[16]  Serena Nik-Zainal,et al.  A mutational signature in gastric cancer suggests therapeutic strategies , 2015, Nature Communications.

[17]  P. Stephens,et al.  Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Esophageal Adenocarcinomas Reveals Similarities and Differences. , 2015, The oncologist.

[18]  S. Tavaré,et al.  Whole-genome sequencing provides new insights into the clonal architecture of Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[19]  A. McKenna,et al.  Paired Exome Analysis of Barrett’s Esophagus and Adenocarcinoma , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[20]  Yan-Ze Jin,et al.  Effects of JWA, XRCC1 and BRCA1 mRNA expression on molecular staging for personalized therapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2015, BMC Cancer.

[21]  Nicolai J. Birkbak,et al.  Clonal status of actionable driver events and the timing of mutational processes in cancer evolution , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[22]  Huanming Yang,et al.  Genomic Analyses Reveal Mutational Signatures and Frequently Altered Genes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , 2015, American journal of human genetics.

[23]  Jessica Zucman-Rossi,et al.  Exome sequencing of hepatocellular carcinomas identifies new mutational signatures and potential therapeutic targets , 2015, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Manolis Kellis,et al.  Large-scale epigenome imputation improves data quality and disease variant enrichment , 2015, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  Jian Sun,et al.  Genetic landscape of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[26]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Multiplatform Analysis of 12 Cancer Types Reveals Molecular Classification within and across Tissues of Origin , 2014, Cell.

[27]  S. Ogawa,et al.  The genomic landscape of nasopharyngeal carcinoma , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[28]  Li Shang,et al.  Genomic and molecular characterization of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[29]  Qiang Feng,et al.  Identification of genomic alterations in oesophageal squamous cell cancer , 2014, Nature.

[30]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types , 2014, Nature.

[31]  R. Young,et al.  Super-Enhancers in the Control of Cell Identity and Disease , 2013, Cell.

[32]  P. Farnham,et al.  Cross-talk between Site-specific Transcription Factors and DNA Methylation States* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[34]  H. Lodish,et al.  Zfp36l2 is required for self-renewal of early erythroid BFU-E progenitors , 2013, Nature.

[35]  R. Langer,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase catalytic subunit/PTEN, and KRAS/NRAS/BRAF in primary resected esophageal adenocarcinomas: loss of PTEN is associated with worse clinical outcome. , 2013, Human pathology.

[36]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[37]  A. McKenna,et al.  Exome and whole genome sequencing of esophageal adenocarcinoma identifies recurrent driver events and mutational complexity , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[38]  Baorui Liu,et al.  BRCA1 mRNA Expression as a Predictive and Prognostic Marker in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Cisplatin- or Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy/Chemoradiotherapy , 2013, PloS one.

[39]  Yuchen Jiao,et al.  Comparative genomic analysis of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[40]  M. Sporn,et al.  NRF2 and cancer: the good, the bad and the importance of context , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[41]  Peter A. Jones Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond , 2012, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[42]  T. Godfrey,et al.  Comparative genomics of esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. , 2012, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[43]  Q. Zhan,et al.  Reciprocal activation between PLK1 and Stat3 contributes to survival and proliferation of esophageal cancer cells. , 2012, Gastroenterology.

[44]  T. Shibata,et al.  NRF2 mutation confers malignant potential and resistance to chemoradiation therapy in advanced esophageal squamous cancer. , 2011, Neoplasia.

[45]  A. Ferrando,et al.  Deletion of the RNA-binding proteins ZFP36L1 and ZFP36L2 leads to perturbed thymic development and T lymphoblastic leukemia , 2010, Nature Immunology.

[46]  Gary D Bader,et al.  International network of cancer genome projects , 2010, Nature.

[47]  W. Chow,et al.  Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus among white Americans by sex, stage, and age. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[48]  M. MacCoss,et al.  The KLHL12–Cullin-3 ubiquitin ligase negatively regulates the Wnt–β-catenin pathway by targeting Dishevelled for degradation , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[49]  P. Blackshear Tristetraprolin and other CCCH tandem zinc-finger proteins in the regulation of mRNA turnover. , 2001, Biochemical Society transactions.

[50]  J. D. Engel,et al.  Keap1 represses nuclear activation of antioxidant responsive elements by Nrf2 through binding to the amino-terminal Neh2 domain. , 1999, Genes & development.

[51]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.