Objective measuring technique for teat dimensions of dairy cows

Interaction between the teat and the teatcup liner can strongly affect the milking characteristics and udder health of dairy cows. Therefore, teat morphology is an important parameter in choosing the most appropriate liner. Nevertheless, information on teat morphology is scarce and rarely sufficient for liner selection. Current techniques for measuring teat morphology are subjective, not always accurate and time consuming, and gathering such information on large scale is difficult. This study presents a new vision based measuring technique that uses a camera to obtain a 2D image of the teat and image processing analysis to determine teat length and diameters. The technique was shown to be accurate. Errors were generally limited to 5% for both teat length and diameters and were less than 2% when the angle of the teat in the longitudinal direction was small.

[1]  J. K. Bertrand,et al.  Simulation study of teat score in first-parity Gelbvieh cows: parameter estimation. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[2]  O. Rønningen,et al.  Factors affecting mouthpiece chamber vacuum in machine milking. , 2003, The Journal of dairy research.

[3]  G. Bakken Relationships between Udder and Teat Morphology, Mastitis and Milk Production in Norwegian Red Cattle , 1981 .

[4]  A. Risvanli,et al.  Relationship between California Mastitis Test score and ultrasonographic teat measurements in dairy cows. , 2009, Australian veterinary journal.

[5]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Responses of the bovine teat to machine milking: measurement of changes in thickness of the teat apex , 1988, Journal of Dairy Research.

[6]  L B Hansen,et al.  Heritabilities of teat end shape and teat diameter and their relationships with somatic cell score. , 1999, Journal of dairy science.

[7]  R. Murray,et al.  Udder shape and teat-end lesions as potential risk factors for high somatic cell counts and intra-mammary infections in dairy cows. , 2010, Veterinary journal.

[8]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Incontinentia lactis: physiology and anatomy conducive to milk leakage in dairy cows. , 2007, Journal of dairy science.

[9]  G. Mein,et al.  100 years with liners and pulsators: where the rubber meets the teat and what happens to milking characteristics , 2003 .

[10]  M. Bjerring,et al.  Testing of liners and measuring material properties , 2003 .

[11]  S. Clausen,et al.  Infrared Thermography and Ultrasonography to Indirectly Monitor the Influence of Liner Type and Overmilking on Teat Tissue Recovery , 2005, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[12]  D. Gleeson,et al.  Effect of liner design, pulsator setting, and vacuum level on bovine teat tissue changes and milking characteristics as measured by ultrasonography , 2004, Irish veterinary journal.

[13]  Muammer Tilki,et al.  Relationships Between Milk Yield and Udder Measurements in Brown Swiss Cows , 2005 .

[14]  K. Malinger,et al.  International type evaluation of dairy cattle. , 2001 .

[15]  R. Bruckmaier,et al.  Milk flow-dependent vacuum loss in high-line milking systems: effects on milking characteristics and teat tissue condition. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  H. Hogeveen,et al.  Recovery of cow teats after milking as determined by ultrasonographic scanning. , 2001, Journal of dairy science.

[17]  J. Hamann,et al.  Recommended method for measuring changes in thickness of the bovine teat with spring-loaded calipers , 1996, Journal of Dairy Research.

[18]  B. McKusick,et al.  PRELIMINARY RESULTS : EFFECTS OF UDDER MORPHOLOGY ON COMMERCIAL MILK PRODUCTION OF EAST FRIESIAN CROSSBRED EWES , 2001 .

[19]  G. A. Mein,et al.  Improving milk quality by improving teat condition : a new method for measuring teat tissue reactions to milking , 1988 .