Optimization of dual-energy imaging systems using generalized NEQ and imaging task.

Dual-energy (DE) imaging is a promising advanced application of flat-panel detectors (FPDs) with a potential host of applications ranging from thoracic and cardiac imaging to interventional procedures. The performance of FPD-based DE imaging systems is investigated in this work by incorporating the noise-power spectrum associated with overlying anatomical structures ("anatomical noise" modeled according to a 1/f characteristic) into descriptions of noise-equivalent quanta (NEQ) to yield the generalized NEQ (GNEQ). Signal and noise propagation in the DE imaging chain is modeled by cascaded systems analysis. A Fourier-based description of the imaging task is integrated with the GNEQ to yield a detectability index used as an objective function for optimizing DE image reconstruction, allocation of dose between low- and high-energy images, and selection of low- and high-kVp. Optimal reconstruction and acquisition parameters were found to depend on dose; for example, optimal kVp varied from [60/150] kVp at typical radiographic dose levels (approximately 0.5 mGy entrance surface dose, ESD) but increased to [90/150] kVp at high dose (ESD approximately 5.0 mGy). At very low dose (ESD approximately 0.05 mGy), detectability index indicates an optimal low-energy technique of 60 kVp but was largely insensitive to the choice of high-kVp in the range 120-150 kVp. Similarly, optimal dose allocation, defined as the ratio of low-energy ESD and the total ESD, varied from 0.2 to 0.4 over the range ESD=(0.05-5.0) mGy. Furthermore, two applications of the theoretical framework were explored: (i) the increase in detectability for DE imaging compared to conventional radiography; and (ii) the performance of single-shot vs double-shot DE imaging, wherein the latter is found to have a DQE approximately twice that of the former. Experimental and theoretical analysis of GNEQ and task-based detectability index provides a fundamental understanding of the factors governing DE imaging performance and offers a framework for system design and optimization.

[1]  I A Cunningham,et al.  Parallel cascades: new ways to describe noise transfer in medical imaging systems. , 2001, Medical physics.

[2]  B K Stewart,et al.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography. , 1990, Medical physics.

[3]  J. Boone,et al.  An accurate method for computer-generating tungsten anode x-ray spectra from 30 to 140 kV. , 1997, Medical physics.

[4]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Conventional chest radiography vs dual-energy computed radiography in the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  D. Gauntt,et al.  X-ray tube potential, filtration, and detector considerations in dual-energy chest radiography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[6]  D B Plewes,et al.  Effects of scattered radiation and veiling glare in dual-energy tissue-bone imaging: a theoretical analysis. , 1987, Medical physics.

[7]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  Generalized DQE analysis of dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[8]  H MacMahon,et al.  Improvement in detection of pulmonary nodules: digital image processing and computer-aided diagnosis. , 2000, Radiographics.

[9]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[10]  Chris C Shaw,et al.  Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections. , 2005, Medical physics.

[11]  R. Alvarez,et al.  Comparison of dual energy detector system performance. , 2004, Medical physics.

[12]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Theoretical optimization of dual-energy x-ray imaging with application to mammography. , 1985, Medical physics.

[13]  M. Rabbani,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of imaging systems with amplifying and scattering mechanisms. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[14]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  DQE and system optimization for indirect-detection flat-panel imagers in diagnostic radiology , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[15]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  Dual-energy chest radiography with a flat-panel digital detector: revealing calcified chest abnormalities. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Mats Lundqvist,et al.  Dual-energy imaging using a photon counting detector with electronic spectrum-splitting , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[17]  D. Jaffray,et al.  Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. , 2001, Medical physics.

[18]  F. Khan.  The physics of radiation therapy , 1985 .

[19]  A. Burgess,et al.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.

[20]  Kenneth M. Hanson,et al.  Variations In Task And The Ideal Observer , 1983, Other Conferences.

[21]  Yi Wang,et al.  Dual-energy computed radiography: improvements in processing , 1994, Medical Imaging.

[22]  W Huda,et al.  Computation of energy imparted in diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[23]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  An innovative phantom for quantitative and qualitative investigation of advanced x-ray imaging technologies. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Giampaolo Gavelli,et al.  Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer , 2000 .

[25]  Quantitative dual-energy coronary arteriography. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[26]  S. Kappadath,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Bernhard Erich Hermann Claus,et al.  Development and characterization of a dual-energy subtraction imaging system for chest radiography based on CsI:Tl amorphous silicon flat-panel technology , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[28]  A Fenster,et al.  Dual-energy mammography: initial experimental results. , 1985, Medical physics.

[29]  C A Mistretta,et al.  Single-exposure dual-energy computed radiography: improved detection and processing. , 1990, Radiology.

[30]  L T Niklason,et al.  Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual-energy digital versus conventional radiography. , 1986, Radiology.

[31]  J W Oestmann,et al.  "Single-exposure" dual energy digital radiography in the detection of pulmonary nodules and calcifications. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[32]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Spektr: a computational tool for x-ray spectral analysis and imaging system optimization. , 2004, Medical physics.

[33]  Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen,et al.  TH‐C‐330A‐09: Cascaded Systems Analysis of Noise Reduction Algorithms for Dual‐Energy Imaging , 2006 .

[34]  J T Ho,et al.  Comparison of dual and single exposure techniques in dual-energy chest radiography. , 1989, Medical physics.

[35]  J Yorkston,et al.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.

[36]  C A Mistretta,et al.  A correlated noise reduction algorithm for dual-energy digital subtraction angiography. , 1989, Medical physics.

[37]  J. Boone,et al.  Binary screen detector system for single-pulse dual-energy radiography. , 1992, Radiology.

[38]  N. A. Shkumat,et al.  High-performance dual-energy imaging with a flat-panel detector: imaging physics from blackboard to benchtop to bedside , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[39]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Generalized DQE analysis of radiographic and dual-energy imaging using flat-panel detectors. , 2005, Medical physics.

[40]  Craig K. Abbey,et al.  Human vs model observers in anatomic backgrounds , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[41]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Quantitative , 2020, Psychology through Critical Auto-Ethnography.

[42]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients , 1982 .

[43]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Linear response theory for detectors consisting of discrete arrays. , 2000, Medical physics.

[44]  Frank Fischbach,et al.  Clinical results of CsI-detector-based dual-exposure dual energy in chest radiography , 2003, European Radiology.

[45]  A. Macovski,et al.  Dual-energy x-ray projection imaging: two sampling schemes for the correction of scattered radiation. , 1988, Medical physics.

[46]  J Yorkston,et al.  Initial performance evaluation of an indirect-detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) prototype for megavoltage imaging. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[47]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[48]  Stephen Rudin,et al.  Micro-angiography for neuro-vascular imaging. II. Cascade model analysis. , 2003, Medical physics.

[49]  P. Munro,et al.  A quantum accounting and detective quantum efficiency analysis for video-based portal imaging. , 1997, Medical physics.

[50]  Sabee Molloi,et al.  Optimization of a flat-panel based real time dual-energy system for cardiac imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[51]  H E JOHNS,et al.  Surface back-scatter in the 100 kV to 400 kV range. , 1954, The British journal of radiology.