Energy and time modelling of kerbside waste collection: Changes incurred when adding source separated food waste.

The collection of source separated kerbside municipal FW (SSFW) is being incentivised in Australia, however such a collection is likely to increase the fuel and time a collection truck fleet requires. Therefore, waste managers need to determine whether the incentives outweigh the cost. With literature scarcely describing the magnitude of increase, and local parameters playing a crucial role in accurately modelling kerbside collection; this paper develops a new general mathematical model that predicts the energy and time requirements of a collection regime whilst incorporating the unique variables of different jurisdictions. The model, Municipal solid waste collect (MSW-Collect), is validated and shown to be more accurate at predicting fuel consumption and trucks required than other common collection models. When predicting changes incurred for five different SSFW collection scenarios, results show that SSFW scenarios require an increase in fuel ranging from 1.38% to 57.59%. There is also a need for additional trucks across most SSFW scenarios tested. All SSFW scenarios are ranked and analysed in regards to fuel consumption; sensitivity analysis is conducted to test key assumptions.

[1]  Ulf Sonesson Modelling of waste collection - a general approach to calculate fuel consumption and time , 2000 .

[2]  Caterina Micale,et al.  Impact of source segregation intensity of solid waste on fuel consumption and collection costs. , 2013, Waste management.

[3]  Weixiang Wu,et al.  Source separation of household waste: a case study in China. , 2008, Waste management.

[4]  Ulf Sonesson,et al.  Modelling of the compost and transport process in the ORWARE simulation model , 1996 .

[5]  Pere Fullana,et al.  DOCTORAL DISSERTATION: METHODOLOGICAL ADVANCEMENTS IN LCA OF WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 2015 .

[6]  Anna Montini,et al.  The dynamics of landfill diversion: Economic drivers, policy factors and spatial issues: Evidence from Italy using provincial panel data , 2009 .

[7]  G. Zeeman,et al.  Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Josias Zietsman,et al.  Evaluation of In-Use Emissions from Refuse Trucks , 2009 .

[9]  T. Tan,et al.  Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production , 2014 .

[10]  Stewart Burn,et al.  A review of policy drivers and barriers for the use of anaerobic digestion in Europe, the United States and Australia , 2015 .

[11]  Chris Park,et al.  The Environment , 2010 .

[12]  N J Themelis,et al.  Assessment of the state of food waste treatment in the United States and Canada. , 2010, Waste management.

[13]  Karl-Heinz Robra,et al.  Two-stage anaerobic fermentation of organic waste in CSTR and UFAF-reactors. , 2002, Bioresource technology.

[14]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  Need for improvements in physical pretreatment of source-separated household food waste. , 2013, Waste management.

[15]  Harma A Greben,et al.  Unlocking the resource potential of organic waste: a South African perspective , 2009, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[16]  Alberto Ayala,et al.  Analysis of heavy-duty diesel truck activity and emissions data , 2006 .