Latanoprost for open-angle glaucoma (UKGTS): a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND Treatments for open-angle glaucoma aim to prevent vision loss through lowering of intraocular pressure, but to our knowledge no placebo-controlled trials have assessed visual function preservation, and the observation periods of previous (unmasked) trials have typically been at least 5 years. We assessed vision preservation in patients given latanoprost compared with those given placebo. METHODS In this randomised, triple-masked, placebo-controlled trial, we enrolled patients with newly diagnosed open-angle glaucoma at ten UK centres (tertiary referral centres, teaching hospitals, and district general hospitals). Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) with a website-generated randomisation schedule, stratified by centre and with a permuted block design, to receive either latanoprost 0·005% (intervention group) or placebo (control group) eye drops. Drops were administered from identical bottles, once a day, to both eyes. The primary outcome was time to visual field deterioration within 24 months. Analyses were done in all individuals with follow-up data. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee (DSMC) recommended stopping the trial on Jan 6, 2011 (last patient visit July, 2011), after an interim analysis, and suggested a change in primary outcome from the difference in proportions of patients with incident progression between groups to time to visual field deterioration within 24 months. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN96423140. FINDINGS We enrolled 516 individuals between Dec 1, 2006, and March 16, 2010. Baseline mean intraocular pressure was 19·6 mm Hg (SD 4·6) in 258 patients in the latanoprost group and 20·1 mm Hg (4·8) in 258 controls. At 24 months, mean reduction in intraocular pressure was 3·8 mm Hg (4·0) in 231 patients assessed in the latanoprost group and 0·9 mm Hg (3·8) in 230 patients assessed in the placebo group. Visual field preservation was significantly longer in the latanoprost group than in the placebo group: adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0·44 (95% CI 0·28-0·69; p=0·0003). We noted 18 serious adverse events, none attributable to the study drug. INTERPRETATION This is the first randomised placebo-controlled trial to show preservation of the visual field with an intraocular-pressure-lowering drug in patients with open-angle glaucoma. The study design enabled significant differences in vision to be assessed in a relatively short observation period. FUNDING Pfizer, UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre.

[1]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[2]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  Improved estimates of visual field progression using bayesian linear regression to integrate structural information in patients with ocular hypertension. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  The United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study: a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial: baseline characteristics. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[5]  R. Ritch,et al.  A randomized trial of brimonidine versus timolol in preserving visual function: results from the Low-Pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  D. Garway-Heath,et al.  Intervals between visual field tests when monitoring the glaucomatous patient: wait-and-see approach. , 2012, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  W. Feuer,et al.  The impact of intraocular pressure reduction on retinal ganglion cell function measured using pattern electroretinogram in eyes receiving latanoprost 0.005% versus placebo , 2010, Vision Research.

[9]  H. Rao,et al.  A randomized trial of brimonidine versus timolol in preserving visual function: results from the Low-pressure Glaucoma Treatment Study. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[10]  A Heijl,et al.  Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[11]  S. Resnikoff,et al.  Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. , 2004, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[12]  Douglas R. Anderson Canadian glaucoma study , 2006 .

[13]  J. Jay,et al.  Early trabeculectomy versus conventional management in primary open angle glaucoma. , 1988, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[14]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression , 2003 .

[15]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Risk factors for incident open-angle glaucoma: the Barbados Eye Studies. , 2008, Ophthalmology.

[16]  B. Pajic,et al.  Comparison of the effects of dorzolamide/timolol and latanoprost/timolol fixed combinations upon intraocular pressure and progression of visual field damage in primary open-angle glaucoma , 2010, Current medical research and opinion.

[17]  Brenda W Gillespie,et al.  Visual field progression in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study the impact of treatment and other baseline factors. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[18]  L. A. Chiasson,et al.  Risk of falls and motor vehicle collisions in glaucoma. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[19]  C. Bunce,et al.  Causes of blind certifications in England and Wales: April 1999–March 2000 , 2008, Eye.

[20]  H Goldmann,et al.  Open-angle glaucoma. , 1972, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  Fred Hendrikse,et al.  Intraocular pressure-lowering effects of all commonly used glaucoma drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[22]  Richard A. Russell,et al.  The United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial: design and methodology. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[23]  B. Prum,et al.  The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. the relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration , 2000 .

[24]  H. Quigley Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  J Katz,et al.  Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  R. Leblanc,et al.  Canadian Glaucoma Study: 2. risk factors for the progression of open-angle glaucoma. , 2008, Archives of ophthalmology.

[27]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. , 2003, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[28]  R. Hitchings,et al.  Long-term functional outcome after early surgery compared with laser and medicine in open-angle glaucoma. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[29]  C. Krakau,et al.  Treatment versus no treatment in chronic open angle glaucoma , 1988, Acta ophthalmologica.

[30]  K. Lindsley,et al.  Neuroprotection for treatment of glaucoma in adults. , 2010, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  Michael V. Boland,et al.  Treatment for Glaucoma: Comparative Effectiveness , 2012 .

[32]  S. Takagi,et al.  Natural History , 2019, Nature.

[33]  O Findl,et al.  Medical interventions for primary open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[34]  J. Henderer,et al.  Glaucoma and Mobility Performance: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Project , 2008 .

[35]  M. Prins,et al.  An evidence-based review of prognostic factors for glaucomatous visual field progression. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[36]  M. Matsumura,et al.  Intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction by latanoprost in Japanese normal tension glaucoma patients over a five-year period stratified by presenting IOP. , 2009, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

[37]  H. Quigley,et al.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[38]  S. Drance,et al.  Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. , 2001, American journal of ophthalmology.

[39]  H. A. Quigley,et al.  Open-angle glaucoma. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.