Geotextile sand filled containers as coastal defence: South African experience

Abstract Geotextile sand filled containers (GSC) have rapidly become the preferred coastal defence on the east coast of South Africa. Their growth can be attributed to political, social and environmental factors. This paper details South African experiences and the observed performance of GSCs. The main failure mechanism of geotextile sand bag seawalls is identified to be the movement of sand within the bags. This movement is observed to be a result of insufficient filling, bag elongation and sand leaking. Through a review of local and international manufacturing and construction techniques we identify methods of reducing the internal movements of sediment. The observed performance of local bags provide a practical full scale validation of the physical model findings of Hornsey et al. (2011) ; Recio and Oumeraci (2007) .

[1]  Knut Oberhagemann,et al.  Geotextile bag revetments for large rivers in Bangladesh , 2011 .

[2]  E. C. Lee,et al.  Geotextile tubes as submerged dykes for shoreline management in Malaysia , 2012 .

[3]  B. Zanuttigh,et al.  Sand bag barriers for coastal protection along the Emilia Romagna littoral, Northern Adriatic Sea, Italy , 2011 .

[4]  Matt Blacka,et al.  Two-dimensional physical modelling of sand filled geocontainers for coastal protection , 2009 .

[5]  Eun-Chul Shin,et al.  Coastal erosion prevention by geotextile tube technology , 2007 .

[6]  M. Rossouw,et al.  Storm Damage and Rehabilitation of Coastal Structures on the East Coast of South Africa , 2010 .

[7]  Hocine Oumeraci,et al.  Sand-filled Geotextile Containers for Shore Protection , 2003 .

[8]  K. Ilamparuthi,et al.  Laboratory studies on geotextile filters as used in geotextile tube dewatering , 2006 .

[9]  E. Shin,et al.  Using submerged geotextile tubes in the protection of the E. Korean shore , 2006 .

[10]  Paul D. Komar,et al.  Increasing Hurricane-Generated Wave Heights along the U.S. East Coast and Their Climate Controls , 2008 .

[11]  Hocine Oumeraci,et al.  Effect of deformations on the hydraulic stability of coastal structures made of geotextile sand containers , 2007 .

[12]  P. W. French,et al.  Coastal Defences: Processes, Problems and Solutions , 2001 .

[13]  P. Komar,et al.  A DYNAMIC REVETMENT AND ARTIFICIAL DUNE FOR SHORE PROTECTION , 2003 .

[14]  Hocine Oumeraci,et al.  Geotextile Sand Containers for Shore Protection , 2009 .

[15]  Barbara Zanuttigh,et al.  Environmental design of coastal defence in Lido di Dante, Italy , 2005 .

[16]  A. Schneider,et al.  Understanding the demographic implications of climate change: estimates of localized population predictions under future scenarios of sea-level rise , 2011 .

[17]  Ron Cox,et al.  Geotextile sand container shoreline protection systems: Design and application , 2011 .

[18]  Grete E. Dinesen,et al.  Low-crested coastal defence structures as artificial habitats for marine life: Using ecological criteria in design , 2005 .

[19]  Ing E. Alvarez,et al.  Beach restoration with geotextile tubes as submerged breakwaters in Yucatan, Mexico , 2007 .

[20]  M. H. Heibaum.  Coastal scour stabilisation using granular filter in geosynthetic nonwoven containers , 1999 .

[21]  Hocine Oumeraci,et al.  Australian and German experiences on the use of geotextile containers , 2007 .

[22]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  An ecological perspective on the deployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastal defence structures , 2005 .

[23]  Georg Heerten,et al.  CASE STUDIES SHOWING THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF GEOTEXTILE SAND CONTAINERS: AN AUSTRALIAN PERSPECTIVE , 2002 .