Transmission tariff allocation using combined MW-Mile & Postage stamp methods

The transmission tariff function will facilitate competitive electricity market by impartially providing energy transportation services to all energy buyers and sellers, while fairly recovering the cost of providing those services. Transmission tariff is more fairly and transparently allocated in order to get full recovery of ARR of transmission facilities by using combination of MW-Mile and Postage stamp method. There are number of variants of MW-Mile method i.e. absolute, dominant and reverse are combined with postage stamp method to allocate the transmission tariff. In this paper a six bus network is used for simulation purpose with two cases of demand variation. It is assumed in this problem the load customer pays the 100% cost of transmission services to the transmission utility. Simulation and results are obtained by using Matlab. Transmission tariff for each load bus is evaluated in all three combinations of MW-mile with postage stamp for each case of demand variation.

[1]  C. Rajagopalan,et al.  Cost of transmission transactions: an introduction , 1991 .

[2]  Jong-Bae Park,et al.  An analytical approach for transaction costs allocation in transmission system , 1998 .

[3]  N. P. Padhy,et al.  A New Approach for Transmission Embedded Cost Allocation in Restructured Power Market , 2005 .

[4]  K.L. Lo,et al.  Certain Considerations In Pricing Unbundled Transmission Services , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Power and Energy Conference.

[5]  S. Serwan,et al.  Comparative analysis of using MW-Mile methods in transmission cost allocation for the Malaysia power system , 2003, Proceedings. National Power Engineering Conference, 2003. PECon 2003..

[6]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  Review of usage-based transmission cost allocation methods under open access , 2000 .

[7]  T. Krause Evaluation of transmission pricing methods for liberalized markets , 2003 .

[8]  B. Gorenstin,et al.  Some fundamental, technical concepts about cost based transmission pricing , 1996 .

[9]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[10]  Manjaree Pandit,et al.  Incentive Charge Calculation for Open Access transmission system , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Power Systems.

[11]  Jiuping Pan,et al.  An interval-based MADM approach to the identification of candidate alternatives in strategic resource planning , 2000 .

[12]  L. Lai Power system restructuring and deregulation : trading, perfomance and information technology , 2001 .

[13]  J. Lima Allocation of transmission fixed charges: an overview , 1996 .

[14]  Mohammad Yusri Hassan,et al.  Assessment of MW-mile method for pricing transmission services: a negative flow-sharing approach , 2007 .