Tensile, fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate properties of silicon carbide whisker and particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites

Abstract Silicon carbide whisker or particulate reinforced aluminum metal matrix composites, especially attractive because of their superior strength, stiffness, low cycle fatigue properties, corrosion fatigue behavior, creep resistance and wear resistance compared with the corresponding wrought aluminum alloys, have shown promise for various critical structural applications. The major drawback of these materials, however, is their less than ideal ductility, fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate (FCGR) properties. Consequently, in order to develop a succinct, structural reliability prediction capability that could be easily applied by design engineers to structures manufactured from these metal matrix composites and to examine initial methods whereby the ductility, fracture toughness and crack growth resistance of these materials might be improved, room temperature tensile, fracture toughness and FCGR tests were conducted on 20 v/o SiCw/2124Al (T6), 25 v/o SiCp/6061 Al (F and T6) and 25 v/o SiCw/6061 Al (T6) metal matrix composites. Compared with the corresponding wrought aluminum alloys, the three subject metal matrix composites demonstrated increased yield and ultimate strengths, substantially inferior ductility and fracture toughness, a lower crack propagation resistance and essentially equivalent values of threshold stress intensity range, Δ K th .

[1]  W. A. Logsdon,et al.  Microstructural characterization of a silicon carbide whisker reinforced 2124 aluminium metal matrix composite , 1987 .

[2]  A. T. Stewart The influence of environment and stress ratio on fatigue crack growth at near threshold stress intensities in low-alloy steels , 1980 .

[3]  P. Liaw,et al.  Computer controlled decreasing ΔK fatigue threshold test , 1983 .

[4]  P. Liaw,et al.  Threshold for fatigue macrocrack propagation in some aluminum alloys , 1981 .

[5]  J. Weertman,et al.  Crack closure and crack propagation rates in 7050 aluminum , 1981 .

[6]  W. A. Logsdon,et al.  Cryogenic Tensile and Fracture Toughness Properties of Three Candidate Structural Materials for the Large Coil Program Superconducting Magnet Conductor Sheath , 1982 .

[7]  Ashok Saxena,et al.  Review and extension of compliance information for common crack growth specimens , 1978 .

[8]  P. C. Paris,et al.  The fracture mechanics approach to fatigue. , 1964 .

[9]  S. Hudak,et al.  VARIABILITY IN FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH RATE TESTING , 1975 .

[10]  R. S. Williams,et al.  Near-threshold fatigue crack growth behavior in copper , 1982 .

[11]  W. Elber The Significance of Fatigue Crack Closure , 1971 .

[12]  P. Liaw,et al.  Influence of gaseous environments on rates of near-threshold fatigue crack propagation in nicrmov steel , 1982 .

[13]  S. Suresh,et al.  Oxide-Induced Crack Closure: An Explanation for Near-Threshold Corrosion Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior , 1981 .

[14]  Peter K. Liaw,et al.  Near-threshold fatigue crack growth behavior in metals , 1983 .

[15]  P. Liaw,et al.  Influence of oxide-induced crack closure on near-threshold fatigue crack growth behavior , 1982 .

[16]  T. Nieh Creep rupture of a silicon carbide reinforced aluminum composite , 1984 .

[17]  K. Minakawa,et al.  On crack closure in the near-threshold region , 1981 .

[18]  R. J. Cooke,et al.  Slow fatigue crack propagation in pearlitic steels , 1974 .